IndiaThe article discusses the ethical and legal justification for using pellet guns against civilians during protests, arguing that the 'less-lethal' framing does not adequately address the harm caused by such tactics. It examines the broader implications of state violence and calls for accountability in the use of non-lethal force. The piece highlights concerns over civilian safety and the potential for escalation during demonstrations, emphasizing the need for more transparent and humane policing practices.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the use of pellet guns as a form of excessive state control and criticizes the justification provided by authorities. It emphasizes civilian harm and calls for greater accountability, which aligns with progressive critiques of police brutality and state overreach. The tone leans左向
