ON
← Back to feed
Why people should work together to shape the economy
World📈 Economy19 days ago

Why people should work together to shape the economy

The article discusses the growing economic inequality and the negative impacts of current economic systems, highlighting the disparity between the wealth of the ultra-rich and global food insecurity. It references data from Oxfam International regarding the flow of wealth from low- and middle-income countries to high-income nations. The text also critiques the prioritization of military spending and 'high-tech solutions' tied to ecological destruction, suggesting a need for a new economic model focused on the common good.

In recent years, the global economic landscape has become increasingly polarized, with stark contrasts emerging between the wealthiest segments of society and the rest of the population. This disparity is not merely a matter of financial imbalance—it reflects deeper structural issues that affect the very fabric of social cohesion and environmental sustainability. At the heart of this discussion is the concept of the "Common Good Economy," a vision articulated by economist Mariana Mazzucato in her 2026 publication *The Common Good Economy: A New Compass*. This idea challenges traditional economic paradigms and calls for a radical rethinking of how economies function, emphasizing collective well-being over individual gain.

According to reports, the 500 richest individuals globally amassed a record $2.2 trillion in 2025 alone, while over two billion people faced moderate or severe food insecurity. These statistics highlight a growing chasm between the affluent and the impoverished, underscoring the need for systemic reform. The charity Oxfam International, headquartered in Nairobi, estimates that the ultra-wealthy in high-income countries siphon approximately $30 million hourly from lower and middle-income nations, where about 85% of the world's population resides. Such figures illustrate the disproportionate impact of economic policies on the global south, exacerbating existing inequalities.

Public funds are increasingly diverted towards military expenditures, which reached a staggering $2.7 trillion in 2024. This allocation of resources underscores a troubling trend where national security concerns overshadow social welfare initiatives. Government investments in so-called "high-tech solutions" are predominantly directed toward industries associated with conflict and ecological degradation, perpetuating cycles of exploitation and environmental harm.

Mazzucato's work builds upon her previous contributions to understanding technological evolution and the role of government in fostering innovation. Her argument posits that current environmental and social crises stem from an economic model centered on extraction and devoid of meaningful democratic oversight. By advocating for a shift towards a Common Good Economy, she proposes a transformative approach that prioritizes collective action and sustainable practices over short-term profits.

Her critique extends to the foundational assumptions of neoclassical economics, which often frames market dynamics as inherently beneficial and self-regulating. Instead, Mazzucato draws on the insights of economic historian Karl Polanyi, highlighting how markets are socially constructed and frequently detrimental to communal interests. Through this lens, she illustrates how corporate strategies focused on maximizing shareholder value have led to significant misallocations of resources, such as the billions spent on share buybacks rather than productive investments.

Moreover, Mazzucato emphasizes the importance of redefining success in economic terms, moving away from narrow metrics like GDP to encompass holistic measures of well-being. This includes recognizing the intrinsic value of nature and community, drawing inspiration from indigenous philosophies such as the Quechua concept of *sumak kawsay*, which promotes harmony with the environment and balanced societal relations.

By integrating diverse perspectives—from Indigenous wisdom to contemporary political theory—Mazzucato advocates for a comprehensive strategy that bridges theoretical discourse with practical implementation. Her vision encourages a participatory approach to economic policy-making, ensuring that reforms are inclusive and responsive to the needs of all members of society. As the world grapples with complex challenges, the call for collaboration and shared responsibility becomes ever more critical in shaping a resilient and equitable future.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Nature News logoNature NewsIndependentLeft19 days ago
Why people should work together to shape the economy

The article discusses the growing economic inequality and the negative impacts of current economic systems, highlighting the disparity between the wealth of the ultra-rich and global food insecurity. It references data from Oxfam International regarding the flow of wealth from low- and middle-income countries to high-income nations. The text also critiques the prioritization of military spending and 'high-tech solutions' tied to ecological destruction, suggesting a need for a new economic model focused on the common good.

Bias read (Left): The article presents a critical perspective on capitalism, emphasizing systemic issues such as wealth inequality, exploitation of low- and middle-income countries, and the prioritization of military and extractive industries over social and environmental well-being. The framing uses strong language,

Project Syndicate logoProject SyndicateIndependentCenter21 days ago
Inequality in Évian

The article argues that inequality in income, wealth, opportunity, and political influence is a central issue affecting the global economy and various shared challenges. It calls on the G7 summit to acknowledge this reality and address it as a root cause rather than merely a symptom.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a general argument about inequality without explicitly favoring any particular political ideology. It frames inequality as a systemic issue requiring attention at international summits like the G7, without using loaded language or one-sided sourcing. The tone is analytical and呼吁

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories