ON
← Back to feed
'Deep links with AAP': BJP calls CJP protest Kejriwal's 'pet project'
India🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservative13 days ago

'Deep links with AAP': BJP calls CJP protest Kejriwal's 'pet project'

The BJP criticized the AAP and Congress over a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar, claiming it was a 'pet project' of Arvind Kejriwal aimed at targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi rather than focusing on education reforms or the NEET paper leak. BJP IT Department head Amit Malviya shared a video (authenticity unverified) where Kejriwal allegedly referred to the protesters as coming to challenge Modi. The BJP accused Kejriwal and his allies of using students for political gain and claimed the protest was a sponsored campaign against Modi. Leaders like Virendra Sachdeva and Swati Maliwal joined the criticism, accusing Kejriwal of hijacking the movement for personal and political benefit.

Raghav Chadha, a former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader who defected to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), posted pictures of his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on social media, describing it as a “detailed and enriching interaction.” The post, shared on X, included two photographs of Chadha with Modi and featured a message expressing gratitude for the prime minister’s time and guidance. This marks Chadha’s first public appearance with Modi since joining the BJP in April, following an exodus of seven AAP Rajya Sabha members. Chadha had previously supported Modi’s proposed legislation against paper leaks and praised the Centre’s anti-paper leak bill during parliamentary proceedings. Chadha’s defection followed a period of growing tensions within the AAP, with some senior members reportedly disillusioned with the leadership of Arvind Kejriwal. The BJP has increasingly positioned itself as a counterweight to the AAP, leveraging internal divisions to expand its influence. In recent weeks, the BJP has intensified its criticism of the AAP, particularly regarding its handling of student protests and educational reforms. On Sunday, the BJP accused the AAP of orchestrating a protest against Chief Justice of India (CJI) Dhananjaya Yamini, claiming it was a “pet project” designed to target Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The allegations were made by BJP IT department head Amit Malviya, who cited a video in which Kejriwal is alleged to have expressed hostility toward Modi. The video, which Malviya shared on X, features Kejriwal making remarks in Hindi that are interpreted as suggesting the protesters were motivated by a desire to challenge Modi. The authenticity of the video has not been confirmed, and several BJP leaders have condemned Kejriwal for these alleged comments. Former Delhi BJP chief Virendra Sachdeva described the remarks as indicative of Kejriwal’s deteriorating mental state, while others accused him of using “Maoist-style language” to describe the protests. The BJP also alleged that the protest, initially framed as a student-led movement, was being manipulated by AAP officials to serve political ends. In response to these accusations, AAP leaders have denied any involvement in orchestrating the protests. They argue that the demonstrations were a legitimate expression of public concern over the NEET paper leak and other issues related to education. The AAP has also criticized the BJP for attempting to politicize the situation and undermine the credibility of the protests. Meanwhile, the government has maintained that the protests were largely peaceful and that law enforcement agencies acted appropriately to ensure order. The controversy surrounding the protests and the alleged remarks by Kejriwal highlights the deepening ideological rift between the AAP and the BJP. As both parties continue to accuse each other of misrepresentation and political manipulation, the situation remains volatile. The outcome of this conflict could have significant implications for the political landscape in Delhi and beyond, influencing voter sentiment and shaping future alliances. As the debate intensifies, the focus remains on the actions and statements of key figures, with both parties seeking to position themselves as defenders of democratic values and transparency. The coming days will likely see further escalation in the rhetoric, with potential legal challenges and public campaigns emerging as the political battle continues. For now, the narrative remains fragmented, with conflicting accounts and unresolved claims continuing to dominate the discourse.

4 reports

The Wire logoThe WireIndependentProgressiveFactual 90Objective 8517 days ago
Im a Criminal: Making Sense of BJPs Rap Video on PM Modi

The article analyzes the BJP's rap video featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi, titled 'I Am a Criminal.' It explores the content of the video, which portrays Modi as a criminal, and examines the political implications of such messaging. The piece discusses how the video was used as part of a broader campaign against Modi, highlighting concerns over the use of inflammatory rhetoric in politics. It also considers the reaction from various political parties and the potential impact on public perception of Modi's leadership. The article emphasizes the need for responsible political discourse and the risks associated with using derogatory language toward leaders.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the BJP's rap video as an example of irresponsible political messaging and criticizes the use of derogatory language toward a leader. While it acknowledges the existence of the video and its intent, it presents the narrative in a way that aligns more closely with critiques of the右

Why factuality (90): The article provides clear details about Raghav Chadha's meeting with PM Modi, including his social media posts and prior support for Modi's policies. It accurately reports his transition from AAP to BJP and aligns with cross-source consensus on his public statements.

Why objectivity (85): The article remains objective, presenting Chadha's actions and statements without overt bias. It reports his alignment with Modi and his new role in BJP without injecting personal opinion or emotional language.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentConservativeFactual 75Objective 6515 days ago
'A morning I will cherish': Raghav Chadha's first post with PM Modi

Raghav Chadha, a former Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) member who defected to the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), posted pictures of his meeting with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on social media. In the post, Chadha described the interaction as 'detailed and enriching' and expressed gratitude for Modi's time and guidance. This follows Chadha's recent support for Modi's anti-paper leak legislation and his decision to join the BJP after leading a group of seven AAP legislators to defect in April. The post highlights Chadha's shift in allegiance and his alignment with Modi's policies.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames Chadha's defection and alignment with PM Modi in a positive light, emphasizing his 'enriching interaction' and 'grateful' sentiment toward Modi. The focus on Modi's policies and Chadha's support for them suggests a right-leaning framing, highlighting the benefits of aligning with右

Why factuality (75): The article accurately reports Raghav Chadha's public social media post following his meeting with PM Modi. It provides context about his political shift from AAP to BJP and mentions his previous support for Modi's anti-paper leak bill. However, it does not provide independent verification of the co

Why objectivity (65): The tone is generally positive toward Modi and the BJP, especially given Chadha's recent alignment with them. While it presents facts neutrally, there is a subtle emphasis on the significance of the meeting, particularly in the context of upcoming elections.

The Print logoThe PrintIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6014 days ago
Why one PM Modi-Nitin Nabin photo may worry BJP leaders and karyakartas

The article discusses concerns within the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) regarding a photograph featuring Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Nitin Nabin. This image has raised questions among BJP leaders and workers, potentially indicating internal tensions or shifts in party dynamics.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a discussion about potential internal concerns within the BJP but does not exhibit clear bias toward either side. It focuses on the implications of a specific photograph without overtly favoring any particular viewpoint or using loaded language.

Why factuality (70): This article discusses potential concerns within the BJP due to a photo involving PM Modi and Nitin Nabin. While no specific details are provided, the article references a cross-source consensus that such photos might be seen as problematic by BJP leaders. The lack of concrete information limits the

Why objectivity (60): The article is framed around a potential issue for the BJP without providing sufficient context or evidence. It uses speculative language ('may worry') and focuses on the implications rather than presenting a balanced discussion of the situation.

Times of India logoTimes of IndiaIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 5513 days ago
'Deep links with AAP': BJP calls CJP protest Kejriwal's 'pet project'

The BJP criticized the AAP and Congress over a protest at Delhi's Jantar Mantar, claiming it was a 'pet project' of Arvind Kejriwal aimed at targeting Prime Minister Narendra Modi rather than focusing on education reforms or the NEET paper leak. BJP IT Department head Amit Malviya shared a video (authenticity unverified) where Kejriwal allegedly referred to the protesters as coming to challenge Modi. The BJP accused Kejriwal and his allies of using students for political gain and claimed the protest was a sponsored campaign against Modi. Leaders like Virendra Sachdeva and Swati Maliwal joined the criticism, accusing Kejriwal of hijacking the movement for personal and political benefit.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the protest as a politically motivated campaign against Modi, uses derogatory terms ('cockroach janta party'), and accuses Kejriwal of hijacking student movements for political gain. The language and emphasis align with right-wing narratives that portray opposition figures as dism

Why factuality (65): The article reports BJP allegations against AAP regarding the CJP protest, citing a video attributed to Kejriwal. However, the video's authenticity cannot be verified, which reduces the reliability of the claim. The article aligns with the cross-source consensus that the BJP is criticizing AAP's act

Why objectivity (55): The tone is clearly biased towards the BJP, using loaded language such as 'turned its guns on the AAP' and 'pet project.' The article frames the situation as a BJP vs AAP conflict without presenting alternative perspectives or balancing viewpoints.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories