United StatesThe article explains how the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the Bill of Rights evolved over time, particularly focusing on the distinction between federal and state powers. It discusses the 1833 case Barron v. Baltimore, which held that the Bill of Rights applies only to the federal government, allowing states to limit certain rights within their jurisdictions. This changed with the 1868 ratification of the 14th Amendment, which extended many of these protections to the states. The article highlights Senator Jacob Howard's explanation of the 14th Amendment's purpose, emphasizing its role in restricting state power. The Supreme Court later affirmed this interpretation in the 1925 case Gitlow v. New York. The piece concludes by referencing a lost amendment proposal by James Madison that would have limited state power further.
Bias read (Center): The article presents historical legal developments and quotes from judicial decisions and legislative records without overtly favoring either political ideology. While it discusses the expansion of civil liberties through constitutional amendments, it does not take a partisan stance on contemporary,
![[EDITORIAL] Impartial justice — ‘yan ang sinagasaan ng ‘trolling’ ni Pia Cayetano](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=newsinfo.inquirer.net%2Ffiles%2F2026%2F07%2FIMG_9942-scaled.jpeg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
