Chinese state media has accused American scholars of promoting a 'New Qing History' school of thought that provides 'theoretical ammunition' to separatists. This academic perspective challenges traditional views of the Qing Dynasty's governance, particularly the concept of Sinicization, by incorporating Manchu-language sources. The criticism reflects broader concerns about historical narratives influencing national unity and ethnic policies. The debate highlights tensions between China's official historical interpretations and alternative scholarly approaches that emphasize multiculturalism and minority perspectives.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the critique of 'New Qing History' as part of a broader ideological battle, emphasizing the threat posed by Western scholarship to China's national identity. It portrays the Chinese state's stance as a defense of historical integrity and national cohesion, while implying that the



