ON
← Back to feed
WHY ARE WE WAITING?: DBE’s guidelines to protect LGBTQI+ pupils still not done after 7 years
ZA🏛️ PoliticsProgressive23 hr. ago

WHY ARE WE WAITING?: DBE’s guidelines to protect LGBTQI+ pupils still not done after 7 years

The article discusses the ongoing delay in the release of the Department of Basic Education's (DBE) guidelines aimed at protecting LGBTQI+ students in South Africa, which have been in development for seven years. The controversy surrounding the flying of the Pride flag at Bishops Diocesan College highlights concerns about the lack of clear policies to address bullying and discrimination against LGBTQI+ youth. The DBE claims the guidelines are in 'advanced stages' of finalization and emphasizes they are non-binding, relying on provincial departments to apply common-sense judgment. However, the Social Inclusion in Education Working Group argues that framing the guidelines as optional undermines the constitutional rights already in place, such as those related to equality and the best interests of the child. The group warns that the prolonged delay has had significant negative impacts on LGBTQI+ learners, including increased bullying, stigma, and educational challenges, with long-term consequences for their well-being and future opportunities.

1 reports

Daily Maverick logoDaily MaverickIndependentProgressive23 hr. ago
WHY ARE WE WAITING?: DBE’s guidelines to protect LGBTQI+ pupils still not done after 7 years

The article discusses the ongoing delay in the release of the Department of Basic Education's (DBE) guidelines aimed at protecting LGBTQI+ students in South Africa, which have been in development for seven years. The controversy surrounding the flying of the Pride flag at Bishops Diocesan College highlights concerns about the lack of clear policies to address bullying and discrimination against LGBTQI+ youth. The DBE claims the guidelines are in 'advanced stages' of finalization and emphasizes they are non-binding, relying on provincial departments to apply common-sense judgment. However, the Social Inclusion in Education Working Group argues that framing the guidelines as optional undermines the constitutional rights already in place, such as those related to equality and the best interests of the child. The group warns that the prolonged delay has had significant negative impacts on LGBTQI+ learners, including increased bullying, stigma, and educational challenges, with long-term consequences for their well-being and future opportunities.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the delay in releasing the guidelines as a failure of governance and highlights the negative impact on LGBTQI+ students, emphasizing the need for concrete protections rather than reliance on non-binding guidance. It criticizes the DBE's approach and supports the call for stronger,

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories