What to Know About Mail-In Voting for the 2026 Midterms

The NationIndependentProgressive14 hr. ago

The article discusses Senator Ted Cruz's proposed 'Protect College Sports Act' and its potential impact on athletes' labor rights. It frames the legislation as a threat to college athletes' rights, suggesting it could undermine their ability to unionize or negotiate better conditions. The piece also covers the Supreme Court's rejection of Donald Trump's attempt to use the USPS to suppress mail-in voting, noting that while Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett supported protecting mail-in voting, Justice Brett Kavanaugh attempted to justify Trump's actions. The article criticizes Trump's reaction to the decision, highlighting his public criticism of the justices and his belief that the court lacks courage. The tone suggests skepticism towards Trump's intentions and approval of the court's decision to protect voting rights.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents Senator Ted Cruz's college sports bill as a threat to athletes' labor rights, implying a negative stance toward the legislation. It critiques Trump's actions and rhetoric, portraying him as lacking integrity and courage, while supporting the Supreme Court's decision to protect投票

ProPublicaIndependentProgressive2 days ago

The Supreme Court recently rejected the Trump administration's attempt to impose new rules for mail-in voting in the 2026 midterms. In March, President Trump issued an executive order directing the USPS to establish new mail-in voting protocols, threatening to withhold ballot delivery if states did not comply. Two federal judges blocked the rule before the November elections, and the Supreme Court upheld this decision in an unsigned order, stating the government was unlikely to succeed on its challenge. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the rule should have taken effect. Trump criticized the ruling on his social media platform, calling it a 'big loss for Republicans.' Experts note that while mail-in voting is widespread, it varies significantly by state, and the current system remains intact. The administration had previously claimed noncitizen voting was rampant, though this claim lacks evidence.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the Trump administration's actions as politically motivated attempts to restrict voting access, using terms like 'restrictions,' 'control over elections,' and 'rampant' claims without evidence. It highlights criticism of Trump's policies and emphasizes the legitimacy of existing选举