Andy Burnham shakes up Whitehall with new government department
Andy Burnham, the deputy prime minister, has restructured parts of the UK government by creating a new prime minister’s department that integrates elements from the Cabinet Office, Treasury, and housing ministry. This new entity, led by Louise Haigh, aims to centralize control over local economic growth and regional empowerment, with operations based in both London and Manchester. While some functions like devolution policy remain under Angela Rayner, the housing secretary, other areas such as HR and digital ID are being redistributed across different departments. The government is offering relocation incentives to encourage civil servants to move to Manchester. The reform is framed as a step toward decentralizing power and improving governance, with support from experts like Hannah White of the Institute for Government.
Andy Burnham, the mayor of Greater Manchester, has introduced sweeping structural changes to the UK's central government, creating a new prime minister’s department aimed at decentralizing power and focusing on regional economic growth. The Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, led by Burnham’s ally Louise Haigh, will oversee operations in both London and the newly established No 10 North in Manchester. This initiative marks a significant shift in how governance is structured, aiming to bring decision-making closer to the people. Burnham’s restructuring involves transferring parts of the Cabinet Office, Treasury, and housing ministry to the new department. Teams focused on local growth and devolution from the Treasury and Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government will be relocated to the No 10 North unit, which will be ultimately overseen by Haigh. However, Angela Rayner, the housing secretary, retains control over devolution policy, ensuring her role is not diminished but rather reinforced from the center of government. The government stated that these changes aim to integrate local economic growth policy and regional empowerment, making No 10 North the dominant driver of the UK’s economy. Other components of the Cabinet Office will be moved into a new agency named OneGov, managed by cabinet secretary Antonia Romeo, which will handle government HR functions such as pensions, recruitment, and security vetting. Additional reorganizations see the equality office moving to the housing ministry; digital ID to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; the public sector fraud authority to the Department for Work and Pensions; and the investment security unit to the Department for Business, Innovation, Science and Trade. To facilitate the transition, the government plans to offer relocation packages to civil servants willing to move north to the upcoming No 10 operation in Manchester. Sources indicated that generous incentives would be necessary to convince employees currently working on local growth initiatives in London to relocate to Manchester swiftly. A No 10 spokesperson emphasized the importance of shifting power and decision-making away from London to areas closer to the people. Staff members, including senior official Caroline Simpson, are already stationed at the new location. Burnham intends to work from Manchester at least one day per week, signaling a commitment to devolution. The changes were formally announced through a written ministerial statement in the House of Lords, following the conclusion of the summer recess for MPs. Angela Smith, the leader of the Lords, described the overhaul as a fundamental rewiring of the state, altering the geographical landscape of government to empower local leaders and serve as a catalyst for economic growth nationwide. She highlighted the significance of placing places at the core of government strategy, establishing No 10 North as the hub for devolution and growth in all regions. Other notable changes include the dissolution of the Department for Science, Technology and Innovation, with its responsibilities reverting to the business and culture departments, as they existed prior to the restructuring under Rishi Sunak. Responsibility for artificial intelligence, however, remains unspecified in current reports. The Institute for Government praised the move, with director Hannah White expressing optimism about the reforms. She noted that an incoming prime minister had finally acknowledged the flaws within the central government structure and implemented the necessary changes advocated by her organization. The shift reflects a broader effort to address perceived inefficiencies and to align governance more closely with the needs and aspirations of local populations.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
The article discusses the recurring theme in British politics of 'devolution'—transferring power from central government to local areas—and critiques the simplistic narrative behind it. It references Labour's 2024 local election campaign, which promoted decentralization under slogans like 'Take Back Control,' echoing the rhetoric of the Brexit movement. While the article acknowledges that centralization has led to a concentration of power in distant institutions, it argues that simply reversing this trend may not address deeper societal changes or current capabilities for self-governance. The piece also examines historical attempts at decentralization, such as Margaret Thatcher's reduction of local authority powers, and questions whether returning to a pre-Thatcher model would effectively solve modern challenges.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced critique of both centralized governance and the promise of devolution, acknowledging the flaws in the current system while questioning the feasibility of returning to a localized model. It avoids overtly favoring either side, instead offering a nuanced analysis of the
Why factuality (90): The article accurately references Labour's 2024 local election campaign and correctly attributes the quoted phrases to Keir Starmer rather than Andy Burnham. It provides proper context about the historical use of 'Take Back Control' messaging in British politics and acknowledges the limitations of t
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents a critical perspective on Burnham's approach, it maintains a relatively balanced tone by acknowledging both the validity and incompleteness of the devolution narrative. However, it leans slightly toward skepticism about the effectiveness of devolution as a solution.
Andy Burnham, the deputy prime minister, has restructured parts of the UK government by creating a new prime minister’s department that integrates elements from the Cabinet Office, Treasury, and housing ministry. This new entity, led by Louise Haigh, aims to centralize control over local economic growth and regional empowerment, with operations based in both London and Manchester. While some functions like devolution policy remain under Angela Rayner, the housing secretary, other areas such as HR and digital ID are being redistributed across different departments. The government is offering relocation incentives to encourage civil servants to move to Manchester. The reform is framed as a step toward decentralizing power and improving governance, with support from experts like Hannah White of the Institute for Government.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the restructuring as a necessary and positive development aimed at improving governance and decentralizing power. It cites government statements and expert opinions without overtly favoring either side. While the implications of the reform are discussed, the framing remains non-
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.