On July 2, 2026, thousands of Israelis gathered at Hostages Square in Tel Aviv to mark exactly 1,000 days since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023. This date marks the beginning of a conflict that resulted in the deaths of over 1,200 Israelis and the capture of more than 250 people, many of whom were held in captivity for months. The gathering was a significant moment for those affected by the attack, as well as for families of the victims and survivors seeking justice and accountability. Attendees expressed their grief, anger, and determination to ensure that the events of October 7 would not be forgotten.
The protest was organized by the October Council, a group composed of bereaved families, survivors, and former hostages. Their primary goal was to push for the establishment of a state commission of inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the attack and the government’s response. This commission would be the highest investigative body in Israel, tasked with examining potential failures and holding officials accountable. However, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has resisted the formation of such a commission, arguing that its members would be selected by the judiciary, which he believes is biased against him. Instead, he has proposed a politically appointed inquiry, which many view as less independent and transparent.
The event saw several notable figures take the stage, including Rom Braslavski, one of the last surviving hostages to be released in the aftermath of the October 7 attack. Braslavski spoke passionately about his experience being held in Gaza for nearly two years, describing the emotional toll of the ordeal. He emphasized that the trauma of the attack would continue to affect him long after the physical captivity had ended. His speech resonated deeply with the audience, reinforcing the collective pain and resilience felt by those present.
Einav Zangauker, mother of Matan, one of the last captives to be freed, delivered a powerful address. She criticized Netanyahu’s leadership, stating that his political decisions had cost lives and left lasting scars on the nation. Zangauker called for a thorough investigation into the government’s actions, asserting that accountability must come before any hope for healing. Her words reflected the sentiments of many attendees, who believed that without justice, the wounds of October 7 would remain open.
As the protest unfolded, participants engaged in various forms of activism, including blocking traffic on major highways and chanting slogans. These actions drew attention to their cause and highlighted the growing frustration among citizens regarding the lack of progress toward a formal inquiry. Some protesters were arrested, indicating the tension between the demonstrators and authorities. Despite these interruptions, the event remained peaceful, with a strong emphasis on unity and remembrance rather than confrontation.
In addition to the main rally in Tel Aviv, similar gatherings took place across Israel, with each location serving as a reminder of the national impact of the October 7 attack. These events underscored the deep divisions within Israeli society, particularly concerning the role of the government in responding to the crisis. While some supported Netanyahu’s approach to national security, others argued that his policies had failed to protect civilians and prevent future tragedies.
The significance of the 1,000-day milestone cannot be overstated. For many, it represents both a measure of time and a testament to the enduring nature of the trauma experienced by those directly affected by the attack. As the nation continues to grapple with the consequences of October 7, the calls for accountability and reform are likely to grow louder. The outcome of these demands will shape not only the immediate political landscape but also the long-term trajectory of Israeli society as it seeks to heal from one of its darkest chapters.
3 reports
The Times of IsraelIndependentLeftyesterday ‘We won’t give up’: Crowd marking 1,000 days since Oct. 7 vows to keep demanding state inquiryThousands of people gathered at Hostages Square in Tel Aviv on July 2, 2026, to mark 1,000 days since the Hamas-led attack on October 7, 2023, which resulted in over 1,200 deaths and the capture of 251 hostages. The demonstration, organized by the October Council—an anti-government group composed of bereaved families, survivors, and former hostages—demanded a state commission of inquiry to investigate the failures before and during the attack. Former hostage Rom Braslavski spoke at the event, describing his experience of being held in Gaza for two years and expressing his commitment to commemorating the attack. The council has called for an independent judicial investigation, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu opposes this, preferring a politically appointed commission. His stance has drawn criticism from activists, including Einav Zangauker, whose son was among the last hostages released.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the demand for a state commission of inquiry as a legitimate and widely supported cause, emphasizing public opinion in favor of an independent investigation. It highlights opposition to Prime Minister Netanyahu’s preferred approach, portraying his resistance as politically driven.
HaaretzIndependent🔒Rightyesterday 'We will not forget or forgive' • In nationwide day of protests, Israelis mark 1,000 days since October 7Israelis participated in nationwide protests to commemorate 1,000 days since the Hamas attack on October 7, which marked the beginning of the ongoing conflict with Gaza. The demonstrations were characterized by strong nationalistic sentiment, with participants vowing not to forget or forgive the attack. The event highlighted the deep emotional and political impact of the incident on Israeli society. Protests took place across the country, reflecting widespread public engagement and collective remembrance.
Bias read (Right): The article emphasizes the nationalistic tone of the protests and the vow to 'not forget or forgive,' which aligns with right-leaning narratives emphasizing security, sovereignty, and resistance against perceived threats. The framing focuses on collective memory and resilience, typical of right-wing
The Jerusalem PostIndependentRightyesterday Was Netanyahu chosen by God, or judged too harshly by man? - opinionThe article reflects on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's leadership, drawing parallels between him and biblical figures chosen by God. It highlights Netanyahu's role in transforming Israel into a global technological and economic powerhouse, strengthening military capabilities, and achieving diplomatic milestones such as the Abraham Accords. The author acknowledges the challenges Netanyahu has faced, including security threats and crises like the October 7 attack. The piece frames Netanyahu as a divinely inspired leader rather than one chosen by human judgment.
Bias read (Right): The article presents Netanyahu in a highly favorable light, comparing him to biblical figures chosen by God and emphasizing his achievements while downplaying criticism. This framing suggests a strong ideological alignment with Netanyahu's policies and legacy, indicating a right-leaning perspective.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter