Ważne orzeczenie ws. składek na ZUS. Chodzi o "sporny wyjątek od zasady"

RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenter5 days ago

The Polish Social Insurance Institution (ZUS) has issued a reminder that the deadline for submitting applications for the '800 plus' benefit for the new payment period 2026/2027 is approaching. The final date to submit the application is midnight on Tuesday, June 30. Parents who miss this deadline will lose their entitlement to payments for June. Most parents and guardians have already submitted their applications, with over 4.2 million applications covering 6.2 million children processed by ZUS. Those who submit after June 30 will receive benefits starting from the month they apply, but without retroactive payment for June. New parents of recently born children have until three months after the child’s birth to submit documents. Applications must be submitted online through specific platforms such as PUE/eZUS, electronic banking, the information service portal, or the mobile app mZUS.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information regarding a bureaucratic process related to social welfare benefits, without overtly promoting any political agenda. It provides clear deadlines, procedures, and consequences of missing them, without taking sides or expressing ideological preferences. While '

RzeczpospolitaIndependentCenter6 days ago

A court ruling has clarified an exception regarding the suspension of social insurance contributions (ZUS) in Poland. The case involved a business owner who had fallen behind on paying social insurance contributions for their employees and requested their suspension due to financial difficulties. However, ZUS refused to consider the request, citing Article 30 of the Social Insurance Act, which excludes the possibility of suspending contributions funded by insured individuals (employees). The entrepreneur disputed this interpretation, arguing that ZUS should have addressed the matter substantively rather than rejecting the application outright. Both the Warsaw Regional Administrative Court (WSA) and the Supreme Administrative Court (NSA) upheld ZUS's position, emphasizing that the exception outlined in Article 30 is strictly defined and does not allow for any substantive resolution based on Article 28 of the same act. This decision reinforces the legal framework that prevents the suspension of contributions funded by employees.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a legal ruling related to social insurance contributions, focusing on the interpretation of specific legal provisions. It provides balanced coverage of the dispute between the business owner and ZUS, along with the judicial decisions from both the regional and national levels.