WATCH: Trump's 'Donroe Doctrine' echoes Monroe-era push for hemisphere dominance

The Trump administration has intensified its strategic engagement with Latin America, adopting a policy framework dubbed the “Donroe Doctrine,” which draws parallels to the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine. This shift marks a notable departure from previous U.S. approaches, emphasizing a more assertive stance aimed at reinforcing American influence across the Western Hemisphere. The policy, named after former President Donald Trump and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, seeks to counter perceived threats from rising global powers, particularly China, while promoting closer ties with regional nations. The Donroe Doctrine gained traction following the U.S.-led intervention in Venezuela in early 2026, where the Trump administration supported efforts to remove President Nicolás Maduro from power. This move was framed as a necessary step to restore stability and democratic governance in the country. Unlike the Monroe Doctrine, which primarily served as a warning to European powers against intervening in the Americas, the current strategy involves direct military and diplomatic actions. The administration has justified these measures by citing legal grounds, including ongoing investigations into Maduro’s alleged involvement with drug cartels, which were pursued by the U.S. Justice Department. Secretary of State Marco Rubio played a central role in advancing the Donroe Doctrine, making multiple visits to Latin American countries to strengthen bilateral relations. His first major overseas trip included a visit to Panama, where he emphasized the importance of securing the Panama Canal, a critical maritime route, against Chinese expansionist ambitions. These diplomatic efforts were accompanied by increased economic incentives, such as proposals to attract private investment into Venezuela’s struggling oil sector. However, the effectiveness of these initiatives remains uncertain, given the political instability and natural disasters that continue to plague the region. The Venezuela operation has sparked debate about whether it sets a precedent for similar interventions elsewhere. While the U.S. has not yet deployed troops in other Latin American nations, the administration has signaled openness to using military assets to achieve strategic objectives. Legal considerations remain a key factor, as the Maduro case provided a unique basis for justifying direct action. Without comparable legal frameworks, replicating such moves in other countries may prove challenging. Nonetheless, the administration has expressed interest in leveraging its military presence to deter external interference and promote democratic values. Latin America has witnessed a growing trend toward right-wing populism, with conservative leaders gaining prominence in several countries. This political shift aligns with the Trump administration’s broader foreign policy goals, which emphasize nationalism and reduced reliance on international institutions. In Colombia, the upcoming presidential election has drawn particular attention, as the nation’s newly elected leader has publicly endorsed Trump’s policies and pledged stronger cooperation with the United States. Such developments suggest that the region may become increasingly aligned with U.S. interests, especially in areas related to security and economic development. As the Trump administration nears the end of its term, the long-term impact of the Donroe Doctrine remains unclear. While the Venezuela initiative has generated both domestic and international controversy, its success in reshaping regional dynamics hinges on sustained political will and effective implementation. The administration continues to explore ways to deepen its influence in Latin America, balancing diplomatic outreach with strategic military posturing. Whether this approach will lead to lasting change or merely serve as a symbolic assertion of U.S. power remains to be seen. For now, the focus remains on immediate geopolitical challenges and the evolving landscape of transnational relations.