ON
← Back to feed
WATCH: Iran battle could reshape Middle East power map, analyst says
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

WATCH: Iran battle could reshape Middle East power map, analyst says

An Iranian-Italian international relations expert, Pejman Bijan, argues that the ongoing tensions with Iran could significantly alter the balance of power in the Middle East and beyond. He views the situation as part of a larger geopolitical struggle involving the United States, China, and Russia, with Europe playing a weakened role due to its lack of unified foreign policy. Bijan suggests that the region's future depends on whether a new order based on political freedom and cooperation can emerge before a rival bloc solidifies. He highlights divisions within Europe's approach to Iran, noting differences between centrist engagement with reformist figures and more critical stances toward political change in Iran.

Iran's evolving geopolitical position amid intensifying regional and global dynamics has sparked discussions about how the balance of power in the Middle East, and beyond, might shift, according to Pejman Bijan, an Iranian-Italian academic specializing in international relations. Speaking to The Media Line, Bijan emphasized that the current struggle surrounding Iran extends far beyond the nation itself, influencing the broader configuration of power across the Middle East and into global politics. Bijan described the situation as a pivotal moment in the realignment of global influence, particularly between the United States, China, and Russia. He argued that the Middle East is at the heart of this contest, with Iran and the Arab states of the Persian Gulf serving as key players. The outcome of developments in the region over the next few months, he suggested, could determine which of these global powers will dominate in the years ahead. According to Bijan, the United States represents a sphere associated with liberal democracies, while China and Russia are linked to authoritarian regimes and state-controlled narratives. He noted that the European Union, though historically aligned with Western values, has struggled to present a unified stance on issues related to Iran and other Middle Eastern matters due to internal divisions and bureaucratic inertia. Bijan highlighted the complexity of Europe's relationship with Iran, pointing to a divide between different political factions. On one side, centrist-left groups have engaged with reformist elements within the Iranian government, including former leaders such as Hassan Rouhani and Mohammad Khatami. These efforts were mirrored by European officials like Federica Mogherini and Josep Borrell, who pursued dialogue with Iran's leadership. In contrast, centrist and center-right politicians have advocated for supporting Iran's younger generation, whom Bijan refers to as the "golden generation." This group, he explained, is pushing for greater political freedoms and democratic reforms within the Islamic Republic. Bijan also examined the implications of the recent Mecca Joint Defense Agreement signed by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Turkey. He viewed this pact as a reflection of diverging political and economic trajectories, with one path leading toward the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC). This ambitious infrastructure project, announced during the G20 summit in 2023, aims to create a comprehensive trade and transportation network connecting India with Europe via the Persian Gulf, Arab states, and Israel. To realize the full potential of IMEC, Bijan stressed the importance of implementing the Abraham Accords, which have facilitated new diplomatic ties between Israel and several Arab nations. He envisioned a route stretching from Mumbai through the United Arab Emirates and Israel’s Haifa port, ultimately reaching the Mediterranean and the Italian port of Trieste. Europe's role in this unfolding scenario remains uncertain, according to Bijan. While the continent possesses historical democratic credentials and considerable economic clout, it lacks a cohesive foreign policy capable of countering the growing influence of Russia and China. He warned that Europe's inability to forge a unified strategy leaves it sidelined in critical global decisions affecting the Middle East. As tensions continue to simmer in the region, the choices made by both Iran and its neighbors will likely shape the geopolitical landscape for years to come. With multiple pathways emerging, the direction of the Middle East, and its impact on the rest of the world, remains fluid and unpredictable.

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenterFactual 75Objective 65yesterday
WATCH: Iran battle could reshape Middle East power map, analyst says

An Iranian-Italian international relations expert, Pejman Bijan, argues that the ongoing tensions with Iran could significantly alter the balance of power in the Middle East and beyond. He views the situation as part of a larger geopolitical struggle involving the United States, China, and Russia, with Europe playing a weakened role due to its lack of unified foreign policy. Bijan suggests that the region's future depends on whether a new order based on political freedom and cooperation can emerge before a rival bloc solidifies. He highlights divisions within Europe's approach to Iran, noting differences between centrist engagement with reformist figures and more critical stances toward political change in Iran.

Bias read (Center): While the article discusses a politically charged subject, geopolitical tensions and power dynamics, it presents a balanced analysis of different perspectives without overtly favoring any particular ideology. The framing remains objective, focusing on Bijan's academic insights rather than promoting a左

Why factuality (75): The article presents analysis from an expert, Pejman Bijan, discussing potential shifts in Middle Eastern power dynamics. While there is no primary source document, the claims align with common geopolitical analyses of the time. The article references the involvement of major powers like the U.S., C

Why objectivity (65): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'battle,' 'reshape,' and 'prevail,' suggesting a clear ideological stance favoring democratic systems over authoritarian regimes. It frames the situation as a conflict between different global orders, which may bias the reader's perception. The f

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories