ON
← Back to feed
Trump's DC crime crackdown 'working' as city sees homicides plummet 43% since 2025: slain intern's mom
United States🏛️ PoliticsConservative10 days ago

Trump's DC crime crackdown 'working' as city sees homicides plummet 43% since 2025: slain intern's mom

Fox News reports that the mother of a Congressional intern killed in 2025 claims that President Donald Trump's crime crackdown in Washington, D.C., has led to a significant reduction in homicides. According to new data from the Major Cities Chiefs Association, homicides in D.C. dropped by 43.9% in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, with 46 homicides recorded in 2026 versus 82 in 2025. This decline followed Trump's deployment of the National Guard and federal officers to take control of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department in August 2025. Tamara Jachym, the mother of the slain intern, stated that the National Guard's presence has made a noticeable difference, citing increased safety and reduced violence. She urged lawmakers opposing such measures to show more compassion toward victims of crime.

President Donald Trump has strongly criticized the Center for American Progress (CAP), a prominent liberal think tank, after its report suggested that National Guard deployments across U.S. cities, including Washington, D.C., had no measurable impact on reducing violent crime. Trump expressed his frustration on Truth Social, accusing CAP of being a “Radical Left SCAM” funded by individuals and corporations such as George Soros, Bill and Melinda Gates, Google, Apple, Visa, Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Walmart, Toyota, T-Mobile, and NBC Universal. He claimed that the report was authored by Chandler Hall, CAP’s associate director of public safety, and labeled him as “foolish.” Trump vowed to take legal action against the organization and its supporters, asserting that crime rates have significantly declined since he assumed office. In response to Trump’s claims, Chandler Hall addressed the findings of the CAP report on C-SPAN’s “Washington Journal.” The report, titled “The Trump Administration’s $1.7 Billion National Guard Deployments Fail To Reduce Urban Crime,” analyzed data from multiple cities and found no evidence that the National Guard deployments had influenced violent crime rates. Hall emphasized that violent crime and homicides had already begun to decrease prior to the National Guard’s deployment, noting that the trend predated the Trump administration. He argued that the president's insistence on attributing the decline in crime to the National Guard deployments was misleading and potentially detrimental to ongoing local efforts to improve public safety. Hall further contended that the National Guard deployments represented a “dangerous power grab” by the Trump administration and contributed to increased unrest in cities that perceived their autonomy as being undermined. His comments followed reports indicating that crime rates have indeed fallen across the United States, with homicides decreasing by 17.2% and robberies by 16.6% in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. These statistics were compiled by the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA), which surveyed 66 large U.S. cities. Notably, cities such as Washington, D.C., Memphis, Tennessee, and Houston showed substantial reductions in homicide rates, with D.C. experiencing a 43.9% decline in homicides from the first half of 2025. Despite these positive trends, some cities, such as Honolulu and San Diego, reported increases in homicide rates. However, the overall pattern suggests a consistent decline in violent crime across the nation, spanning both the Biden and Trump administrations. The Council on Criminal Justice (CCJ) confirmed similar findings, noting an 18% drop in homicides among 30 reporting cities in the first half of 2026. This decline has occurred despite varying political leadership, policing strategies, and levels of federal involvement in different cities. The White House has seized upon the declining crime rates to bolster its narrative, claiming that President Trump has delivered on his promise to “make America safe again.” According to a White House statement, the data demonstrates that Trump’s administration has achieved a historic reduction in crime more swiftly and effectively than any previous administration. However, the debate over whether the National Guard deployments played a direct role in this decline remains contentious, with critics arguing that other factors, such as improved policing strategies and natural fluctuations in crime rates, may be responsible. As the controversy unfolds, the future of the National Guard’s presence in Washington, D.C., remains uncertain. While the administration has indicated plans to maintain a National Guard presence throughout Trump’s second term, the financial implications of this decision are considerable, with estimates projecting a cost of approximately $1.4 billion by January 2029. Meanwhile, the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department has acknowledged the city’s progress in reducing crime but has attributed much of this success to existing policies and initiatives rather than the federal intervention.

4 reports

Axios logoAxiosIndependentConservativeFactual 90Objective 7012 days ago
Homicides fall 17% in big U.S. cities as the post-pandemic crime decline continues

Homicide rates in major U.S. cities decreased by 17.2% in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, according to preliminary data from the Major Cities Chiefs Association. This marks a continuation of a post-pandemic decline in violent crime that began under President Biden and has persisted under President Trump. The data includes significant drops in cities like Washington, D.C., Memphis, and Houston, though some areas experienced increases, such as Honolulu and San Diego. The White House attributed the trend to Trump's policies, including the deployment of the National Guard in certain cities.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the ongoing decline in violent crime as a success of President Trump's policies, particularly highlighting his claim of making America 'safe again.' It emphasizes Trump's role in reducing crime despite the data showing the trend began under Biden. The White House's statement cited

Why factuality (90): The article provides detailed statistics on the decline in homicides and violent crime, citing the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA) and offering specific percentages and examples. It aligns closely with the primary source document's assertion that crime trends began before Trump's deployments

Why objectivity (70): The article remains largely neutral, presenting statistical data and allowing readers to draw their own conclusions. While it mentions Trump's claims, it does not overtly criticize or praise them, maintaining a balanced tone throughout.

Fox News (US) logoFox News (US)IndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 7011 days ago
Trump's DC crime crackdown 'working' as city sees homicides plummet 43% since 2025: slain intern's mom

Fox News reports that the mother of a Congressional intern killed in 2025 claims that President Donald Trump's crime crackdown in Washington, D.C., has led to a significant reduction in homicides. According to new data from the Major Cities Chiefs Association, homicides in D.C. dropped by 43.9% in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period in 2025, with 46 homicides recorded in 2026 versus 82 in 2025. This decline followed Trump's deployment of the National Guard and federal officers to take control of the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department in August 2025. Tamara Jachym, the mother of the slain intern, stated that the National Guard's presence has made a noticeable difference, citing increased safety and reduced violence. She urged lawmakers opposing such measures to show more compassion toward victims of crime.

Bias read (Conservative): The article presents the success of Trump's crime crackdown in a highly favorable light, emphasizing the drop in homicides as proof of effectiveness. It quotes a victim's family member praising the National Guard's role and includes a direct quote from a White House spokesperson endorsing Trump's 's

Why factuality (85): The article cites a specific decline in homicides (43.9%) and references a primary source document (Major Cities Chiefs Association data). It also mentions Trump's deployment of the National Guard and his stated goals for the crackdown. However, it lacks detailed methodology or sources for the homic

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the information in a manner that suggests support for Trump's actions, using phrases like 'working' and emphasizing the positive outcome of the crime crackdown. While it provides facts, the tone leans towards endorsing the policy rather than presenting a balanced view.

RealClearPolitics logoRealClearPoliticsIndependentConservativeFactual 65Objective 7010 days ago
Crime Crackdown 'Working,' DC Homicides Plummet

The article discusses the impact of former President Donald Trump's National Guard deployment in Washington, D.C., following a fatal shooting of Tamara Jachym's son, Eric Tarpinian-Jachym, in 2025. The piece highlights Jachym's belief that the crackdown on crime has been effective, as evidenced by a significant decrease in homicides in the city. It focuses on personal testimony and the perceived success of the security measures implemented under Trump's directive.

Bias read (Conservative): The article emphasizes the effectiveness of Trump's National Guard deployment, which aligns with conservative policies and rhetoric around law enforcement and security. The framing suggests approval of the action taken by a prominent Republican figure, indicating a right-leaning perspective.

Why factuality (65): The article makes a claim that the crime crackdown is working based on a drop in homicides, but does not provide specific data or sources to support this assertion. The reference to Tamara Jachym's personal experience is anecdotal and not sufficient evidence to confirm the overall effectiveness of t

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'working' and references a tragic personal loss to frame the narrative, which may introduce bias. While it presents a perspective from a victim’s family, it lacks balance by not addressing counterarguments or alternative explanations for the repo

NPR News logoNPR NewsIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 5512 days ago
1 year in, National Guard became a part of D.C. life. And, deadly quake hits Colombia

The article notes that one year has passed since the National Guard was deployed to Washington, D.C., highlighting its ongoing presence in the city. It also reports on a separate event, a 7.4 magnitude earthquake in Colombia that resulted in over 100 deaths. The piece serves as a brief update on two distinct events without delving into detailed analysis or commentary.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the National Guard's deployment and the earthquake without overtly favoring any political perspective. It provides factual updates without editorializing or emphasizing particular viewpoints, maintaining a balanced tone.

Why factuality (65): This article significantly diverges from the primary source, stating 132 deaths and mentioning 2,700 people missing, which is not supported by the primary source. It also fabricates details about the president's visit and the number of homes damaged. The article uses AP images but does not cite the

Why objectivity (55): The tone is highly sensationalist, using phrases like 'death toll revised upwards' and 'thousands reported missing' without supporting evidence. The article appears to take a more alarmist stance compared to the primary source, suggesting a biased approach.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories