ON
← Back to feed
Warm From Home: Outrage as WFH civil servants 'have heating bills paid for by hard-working taxpayers'
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsConservativeyesterday

Warm From Home: Outrage as WFH civil servants 'have heating bills paid for by hard-working taxpayers'

The UK's HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has faced criticism for spending over £610,000 on heating bills for civil servants who work from home since 2022. This includes a doubling of such subsidies from £95,000 in 2022 to £211,000 in 2026. The funds are allocated specifically to contractual remote workers, not those under hybrid arrangements. Critics argue this represents a misuse of public funds, especially amid rising energy costs for households. Shadow ministers and critics have condemned the practice as unfair to ordinary citizens struggling with energy bills. HMRC clarified that these payments apply only to a small portion of its workforce, about 7%, who are designated as full-time remote workers.

1 reports

Daily Mail logoDaily MailIndependentConservativeyesterday
Warm From Home: Outrage as WFH civil servants 'have heating bills paid for by hard-working taxpayers'

The UK's HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has faced criticism for spending over £610,000 on heating bills for civil servants who work from home since 2022. This includes a doubling of such subsidies from £95,000 in 2022 to £211,000 in 2026. The funds are allocated specifically to contractual remote workers, not those under hybrid arrangements. Critics argue this represents a misuse of public funds, especially amid rising energy costs for households. Shadow ministers and critics have condemned the practice as unfair to ordinary citizens struggling with energy bills. HMRC clarified that these payments apply only to a small portion of its workforce, about 7%, who are designated as full-time remote workers.

Bias read (Conservative): The article uses emotionally charged terms like 'grotesque waste,' 'hand-outs,' and 'net zero obsession,' which frame the issue as a misallocation of resources by public servants at the expense of ordinary citizens. It emphasizes the contrast between public sector benefits and private-sector burdens

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories