ON
← Back to feed
Wait for children's outpatient spinal appointments down to under four months
Ireland🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

Wait for children's outpatient spinal appointments down to under four months

Children’s Health Ireland (CHI) reported that the average waiting time for outpatient spinal appointments for children has dropped from 7.4 months to 3.9 months since last year. The number of spinal surgeries performed between January and July exceeded the number of new cases added to the waiting list during the same period. While 99.5% of patients now wait less than a year for an appointment, some families express dissatisfaction with the transparency and responsiveness of the care process, particularly regarding document access and the upcoming statutory inquiry into CHI's services. Two advocacy groups withdrew from the inquiry due to concerns about the process, but the health minister emphasized that all patients and families are equally important.

The average wait time for children’s outpatient spinal appointments has dropped to just under four months, marking a significant improvement from 7.4 months a year ago. According to Children’s Health Ireland (CHI), 99.5% of patients now wait less than a year for an appointment, and those waiting longer than that have received specific dates for their procedures. The reduction in wait times comes amid efforts to address long-standing delays in treating childhood scoliosis and related conditions. Since January, 229 new cases have been added to the spinal surgery waiting list, while 279 procedures have been performed during the same period. This means more surgeries have been conducted than new patients added to the list, indicating improved capacity. At the end of July, 431 patients were on the outpatient department waiting list, a decrease of over 22.6% compared to the same point last year. Meanwhile, the number of children awaiting spinal surgery has fallen to 199, down from 231 at this time last year. CHI attributes the improved performance to increased capacity, including the introduction of weekend clinics. These additional resources have helped shorten wait times and ensure timely access to care. Dave Moore, head of the Spinal Surgery Management Unit at CHI, explained that patient prioritization considers several factors, such as the severity of the condition, the size of the spinal deformity, and whether the child has other medical issues. Age and the remaining potential for growth are also taken into account when determining the order of treatment. Despite these improvements, some challenges persist. As of July, 104 children still needed pre-operative assessments before they could be scheduled for surgery. Of these, 12 have received surgery dates, while 36 have already undergone procedures and are awaiting follow-up care. Some patients require multiple interventions, which further complicates scheduling. Additionally, seven children are waiting between 12 and 15 months, two between 18 and 24 months, and one between 24 and 36 months for their operation. In 2017, then-health minister Simon Harris pledged that no child would wait more than four months for scoliosis surgery. However, this goal remained unmet for years, leading to public criticism and calls for better oversight. In response, the Health Service Executive (HSE) began arranging overseas treatments for children whose wait times exceeded acceptable limits. Since 2024, 19 patients have been treated abroad, helping to alleviate pressure on domestic services. CHI continues to work toward achieving a target of 540 spinal surgeries by the end of 2026. While this figure represents a key milestone, the organization emphasizes that its primary objective is to minimize waiting times for patients. Lucy Nugent, CHI chief executive, noted that the latest data reflects ongoing progress in delivering timely care to children requiring spinal intervention. Recent developments have also sparked controversy among some families and advocacy groups. A scoping exercise aimed at launching a statutory inquiry into how CHI manages care for children with scoliosis, spina bifida, and hip dysplasia is currently underway. However, two major organizations, the Spina Bifida & Hydrocephalus Paediatric Advocacy Group and the Scoliosis Advocacy Network, have withdrawn from the initiative, citing concerns over transparency and accessibility of information. They argue that critical documents related to CHI’s practices have not been shared with families. Health Minister Jennifer MacNeill has stated that no individual or group should take priority over another in the inquiry process. She emphasized that the focus remains on ensuring equitable care for all children. Despite the withdrawal of some advocacy groups, the inquiry is expected to proceed, with an invitation extended to all stakeholders to participate.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

RTÉ News logoRTÉ NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 50Objective 3010 days ago
Children's spinal surgery waiting list falls below 200

The number of children and young people waiting for spinal surgery in Ireland has decreased to 199 patients, down from 231 at the same time last year, according to recent data from Children's Health Ireland (CHI). Since January 2026, 279 spinal surgeries have been performed, while 229 new cases have been added to the waiting list. The longest wait times range from 12 to 36 months, with seven patients waiting between 12-15 months and one patient waiting up to 36 months. Additionally, the outpatient waiting list has seen a significant drop of over 22.6% compared to the previous year. CHI aims to perform 540 spinal surgeries by the end of the year and continues efforts to reduce waiting times for patients.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data regarding the reduction in the spinal surgery waiting list for children and does not exhibit clear bias toward any political stance. It includes statements from CHI officials outlining their goals and methods, providing balanced information without overtly favoring,

Why factuality (50): The article provides statistics about spinal surgery waiting lists and procedures performed by CHI, but it does not mention the specific concerns raised by advocacy groups regarding transparency or the inquiry into CHI. It focuses solely on operational metrics rather than addressing the broader syst

Why objectivity (30): The tone is positive and celebratory of CHI's efforts, using phrases like 'continued progress' and 'every effort.' This contrasts sharply with the critical perspective presented in the primary source, suggesting a lack of balance and potential bias towards institutional performance.

TheJournal.ie logoTheJournal.ieIndependentCenterFactual 40Objective 2510 days ago
Wait for children's outpatient spinal appointments down to under four months

Children’s Health Ireland (CHI) reported that the average waiting time for outpatient spinal appointments for children has dropped from 7.4 months to 3.9 months since last year. The number of spinal surgeries performed between January and July exceeded the number of new cases added to the waiting list during the same period. While 99.5% of patients now wait less than a year for an appointment, some families express dissatisfaction with the transparency and responsiveness of the care process, particularly regarding document access and the upcoming statutory inquiry into CHI's services. Two advocacy groups withdrew from the inquiry due to concerns about the process, but the health minister emphasized that all patients and families are equally important.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from CHI regarding improved wait times and surgical outcomes, which is balanced by mentions of family dissatisfaction and advocacy group concerns. While there is a mention of political figures like former Minister Simon Harris and current Minister Jennifer MacNeill,

Why factuality (40): The article mentions the average wait time for outpatient appointments and compares it to previous years, but it fails to connect these figures to the specific case of Harvey Morrison or the advocacy groups' concerns. It lacks context about the broader systemic failures and the ongoing inquiry into

Why objectivity (25): The article maintains a generally positive tone, emphasizing improvements in wait times and operational efficiency. It omits the critical perspectives from families and advocates, presenting a one-sided view that may not reflect the full complexity of the situation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories