ON
← Back to feed
Vučić criticized The Hague after Mladić's death
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsConservative17 hr. ago

Vučić criticized The Hague after Mladić's death

On August 28, 2026, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić criticized the Hague tribunal's decision that led to the death of war criminal Ratko Mladić in custody rather than in Serbia. He accused international courts of double standards, arguing they wanted Mladić to die in prison abroad rather than in his homeland. Vučić expressed concerns over the lack of information regarding Mladić’s funeral arrangements and whether his body would ever be returned to Serbia. He stated that if Mladić’s family wished for a burial in Serbia, the country would assist in ensuring a dignified ceremony. Vučić also claimed that external pressures are attempting to determine who will more harshly condemn General Mladić, but he vowed not to cooperate. He concluded by asserting that the international tribunals aim to demonstrate that Serbs were not responsible for crimes against Croats and Bosniaks, while those who were guilty remain permanently so.

1 reports

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒Conservative17 hr. ago
Vučić criticized The Hague after Mladić's death

On August 28, 2026, Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić criticized the Hague tribunal's decision that led to the death of war criminal Ratko Mladić in custody rather than in Serbia. He accused international courts of double standards, arguing they wanted Mladić to die in prison abroad rather than in his homeland. Vučić expressed concerns over the lack of information regarding Mladić’s funeral arrangements and whether his body would ever be returned to Serbia. He stated that if Mladić’s family wished for a burial in Serbia, the country would assist in ensuring a dignified ceremony. Vučić also claimed that external pressures are attempting to determine who will more harshly condemn General Mladić, but he vowed not to cooperate. He concluded by asserting that the international tribunals aim to demonstrate that Serbs were not responsible for crimes against Croats and Bosniaks, while those who were guilty remain permanently so.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the international tribunal's actions as biased and politically motivated, emphasizing Serbia's sovereignty and national pride. The language suggests a defense of Serbian interests and a critique of Western institutions, aligning with right-wing nationalist rhetoric. The focus on '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories