Vucic wanted to discredit the students, they are cruelly trolling him: President, you know best what it is like to be a parasite

N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 705 days ago

The Serbian non-governmental organization CRTA released a public opinion survey suggesting that a student-led political list would receive more support than the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) in upcoming parliamentary elections. President Aleksandar Vučić criticized the survey, calling it propaganda. In response, CRTA's research director Vojislav Mihajlović argued that if the data were inaccurate, early elections would have already been called, referencing Serbia's recent history of frequent elections. The survey was conducted between June 10–24 by CRTA and Stanford University’s Democracy Action Lab using face-to-face interviews with a representative sample of 2,324 adults. Mihajlović emphasized that the methodology followed global standards and that the sample size was significantly larger than typical surveys in Serbia. Vučić has faced pressure from mass anti-government protests led by student groups demanding early elections, which he attributes to efforts to destabilize his administration.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both the claims made by CRTA and the rebuttals from President Vučić without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both parties involved and provides background on the survey's methodology and the political context of the dispute. There is no evident bias,煽

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a survey conducted by CRTA and Stanford’s Democracy Action Lab using a representative sample of 2324 adults in Serbia. It provides specific percentages and methodology, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the survey was conducted properly. The response from Vojislav

Why objectivity (70): The article presents both sides of the debate—Vučić’s criticism and CRTA’s defense—but leans slightly toward supporting the credibility of the survey and CRTA’s position. There is some editorializing in the phrasing, such as 'voli čitati istraživanja, ali se on ne bavi tim poslom,' which implies jud

Telegram.hrIndependentProgressiveyesterday

The article reports on tensions between Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić and student protesters who have been leading anti-government demonstrations in Serbia. Vučić criticized students on a televised appearance, calling them 'parasites on state cradles' and accusing them of undermining the education system during university blockades. In response, students mocked Vučić by sharing online messages such as 'But Mr. President... you're not on the list,' suggesting his criticism was unfounded. The protests were sparked by the death of 16 people in a collapsed roof at a recently renovated railway station in Novi Sad in December 2024. Students claim they have gained significant public support and announced their candidate list for early elections, which Vučić has repeatedly promised but not yet scheduled. Vučić's allies in the media have published projected lists of student candidates, which students dispute as speculation. They insist their official list will be released once elections are officially called.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames Vučić's criticism of students as politically motivated and dismissive, while portraying the students as legitimate protest leaders seeking democratic reforms. The tone suggests skepticism toward Vučić's authority and aligns more closely with opposition viewpoints. The emphasis on