ON
← Back to feed
More and more children in distress are waiting in lines, and the bill is on the table, but the department is not in a hurry.
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter2 days ago

More and more children in distress are waiting in lines, and the bill is on the table, but the department is not in a hurry.

An increasing number of children and adolescents in Slovenia are facing excessively long waiting times for their first psychological evaluation by a child psychiatrist. Experts from the professional association and the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ) have proposed additional staffing for mental health centers for children and youth (CDZOM), but the Ministry of Health insists that existing infrastructure must be fully utilized before expanding. Data show that average waiting times have significantly increased, with some patients waiting over 800 days for a 'regular' appointment. Despite the establishment of CDZOMs since 2019, the network remains incomplete, and current staffing levels, only one child psychiatrist per team, are deemed insufficient to meet growing demand. The situation has led many children to seek urgent care instead of scheduled appointments.

More children are waiting longer than acceptable for their first psychiatric evaluation, with some facing delays exceeding 800 days. The issue has sparked calls for urgent action, yet the Ministry of Health continues to prioritize filling existing resources before expanding the network of child and adolescent mental health centers (CDZOM). According to data from the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ), the average waiting time for initial evaluations has reached alarming levels, with over 1,000 children and adolescents awaiting care under the “regular” category alone. The situation has worsened significantly since July, with waiting times far exceeding legal limits. For patients assigned the “very fast” priority, the maximum allowed waiting period is 30 days, but nearly 479 children and adolescents were still waiting beyond this threshold. Similarly, over 391 were waiting more than 90 days for the “fast” category, and 354 exceeded the 180-day limit for the “regular” category. These figures highlight a systemic failure to meet even basic service standards, raising concerns among professionals and families alike. Pediatric psychiatrist Maja Drobnič Radobuljac warns that the lack of properly structured teams in Ljubljana has led to prolonged waits across the country. She notes that while the establishment of CDZOM centers has improved access to care, the current staffing model, typically one pediatric psychiatrist per team, is insufficient to address growing demand. In fact, the National Program for Mental Health 2018–2028 mandates only one specialist per team, despite clear evidence of inadequate capacity. The Association for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry has been urging the ministry to revise its approach since late 2024. They argue that having two pediatric psychiatrists per team would better manage workload and reduce wait times. However, these recommendations have not been acted upon, even after over a year and a half. As of early 2026, only 26 teams operate within 22 CDZOM centers, far below the planned number. In Ljubljana, six teams were initially intended, but only two are currently active. In Novo Mesto, the local hospital failed to secure the minimum staff required for a team in 2025, and the CDZOM center in Kocje Polje remains unestablished. Despite the challenges, the CDZOM model was designed to improve early, comprehensive, and community-based care for children and adolescents. These centers aim to increase accessibility to identification, treatment, and support services through primary healthcare settings, eliminating the need for referrals. Yet, the shortage of qualified personnel has undermined this goal, leaving many families without timely assistance. In November 2025, the National Institute of Public Health released an analysis of CDZOM performance, recommending the introduction of additional specialists in child and adolescent psychiatry. This aligns with earlier calls from the professional community, which emphasized the potential impact of such measures on reducing waiting times. While the ministry has acknowledged the need for expansion, it has not yet taken decisive steps to implement these changes, leaving the system in a state of crisis.

1 reports

N1 Slovenija logoN1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 782 days ago
More and more children in distress are waiting in lines, and the bill is on the table, but the department is not in a hurry.

An increasing number of children and adolescents in Slovenia are facing excessively long waiting times for their first psychological evaluation by a child psychiatrist. Experts from the professional association and the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ) have proposed additional staffing for mental health centers for children and youth (CDZOM), but the Ministry of Health insists that existing infrastructure must be fully utilized before expanding. Data show that average waiting times have significantly increased, with some patients waiting over 800 days for a 'regular' appointment. Despite the establishment of CDZOMs since 2019, the network remains incomplete, and current staffing levels, only one child psychiatrist per team, are deemed insufficient to meet growing demand. The situation has led many children to seek urgent care instead of scheduled appointments.

Bias read (Center): The article presents data and expert opinions without overtly favoring any side. It highlights the problem of long waiting times and the call for more resources, while also noting the ministry’s position. There is no clear ideological framing or biased language, and the tone remains objective.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on the growing wait times for pediatric psychiatry appointments in Slovenia, citing data from the National Institute of Public Health (NIJZ) and expert statements. It references specific numbers and statistics, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the current system is i

Why objectivity (78): The tone remains informative and objective, presenting both the problem and the government's stance without overt bias. However, there is a slight leaning towards highlighting the issue, which may suggest a subtle editorial emphasis on the urgency of the situation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories