A serious oversight has been identified in the operations of the courts in Šibenik and Zadar, according to conclusions issued by the Supreme Court of Croatia. These findings were made after an inspection conducted by the Supreme Court, which highlighted significant shortcomings in the functioning of the municipal courts in both cities. The conclusions have been handed over to the presidents of these courts, who are required to implement them within a period of 15 days. The issues raised include inefficiencies in case management, delays in processing legal matters, and internal conflicts among court staff that hinder the effective administration of justice.
In Šibenik, the Supreme Court found that the president of the Municipal Court, Mirko Škarica, had failed in his duties as head of the judicial administration, leading to a decline in the efficiency of the court's operations. According to the findings, Škarica did not adequately monitor the work of judges, organize their schedules, assign cases appropriately, or take measures to resolve old and inactive cases. This lack of supervision was particularly evident in the organization of criminal proceedings, where one notable example was the case involving the murder of Kristijan Aleksić from Drniš. In this case, since the indictment was confirmed in November 2023, no judicial action had been taken for more than two years. The Supreme Court emphasized that these deficiencies were not recent but had developed over several years due to the failure of the court president to ensure efficient operation of the court.
The situation in Zadar was also found to be problematic, though for different reasons. The Supreme Court noted that there were seriously disrupted interpersonal relationships between some judges and the court administration, further complicating the functioning of the court. It criticized the removal of traffic reference points in the permanent services in Pag, Benkovac, and Biograd na Moru, which made access to the courts more difficult for citizens and placed additional burdens on police work. The Supreme Court stressed that disagreements regarding the annual scheduling of cases should not compromise the functioning of the court or the right of citizens to receive judgment within a reasonable time. Both the president of the court and the judges were urged to cooperate in the interest of efficient justice delivery.
The findings also pointed out the need for accelerating the resolution of old cases, monitoring cases at risk of becoming obsolete, and improving the efficiency of land registry, traffic offense, and civil dispute departments. Specific recommendations included reducing the number of unresolved cases older than ten years, updating work on cases where no action has been taken for more than six months, increasing the effectiveness of work in the land registry and traffic offense departments, preventing the aging of criminal and traffic offense cases, and enhancing the dynamics of resolving civil disputes assigned to judicial advisors.
The problems in Zadar were exacerbated by a conflict among the judges, prompting the Ministry of Justice to initiate an extraordinary inspection in March. The ministry reported that the Judicial Inspection had received submissions from Zadar’s municipal courts, indicating that the court president, Marija Knez, had altered and supplemented previous scheduling arrangements. This move reportedly caused dissatisfaction among the judges, contributing to the existing tensions within the court. The Supreme Court's findings underscored the importance of addressing these internal conflicts promptly to restore public confidence in the judiciary and ensure that the courts operate effectively and transparently.
The impact of these findings extends beyond the immediate administrative challenges faced by the courts in Šibenik and Zadar. They highlight broader concerns about the efficiency and integrity of the Croatian judicial system. With the upcoming tourist season, the decision to reinstate traffic reference points in certain areas could significantly ease the handling of legal procedures during peak times. However, the long-term implications of these revelations remain uncertain. The Supreme Court's emphasis on swift implementation of its recommendations suggests that there is an urgent need for reform and improved governance within the affected courts.
Looking ahead, the response from local authorities and the judiciary will be crucial in determining whether these issues can be resolved effectively. The involvement of the Ministry of Justice indicates that higher-level intervention may be necessary to address systemic problems rather than isolated incidents. As the courts in Šibenik and Zadar work to implement the Supreme Court's directives, the focus will likely shift towards restoring trust among the public and ensuring that the judicial process remains accessible, fair, and timely for all citizens. The coming months will be critical in assessing how well these reforms are implemented and whether they lead to lasting improvements in the functioning of the courts.
10 reports
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe article reports on a judicial oversight conducted by the Supreme Court after a high-profile case involving Christian Aleksic, a convicted murderer who reoffended after release. The oversight revealed significant irregularities at both the municipal courts in Šibenik and Zadar. In Šibenik, the court president, Mirko Škarica, has been criticized for years of inefficiency, including failing to organize work, track judges' performance, and resolve pending cases. This led to delays in processing cases, notably in Aleksic’s case where the indictment was confirmed in late 2023 but no judicial action followed. The Supreme Court ordered corrective measures within 15 days. The report highlights systemic issues, suggesting that poor management and lack of oversight contributed to the backlog, especially after three judges were temporarily suspended.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of judicial inefficiencies without overtly criticizing specific political figures or parties. While it discusses governance and administrative failures, it does not take a clear ideological stance. The focus remains on institutional shortcomings rather than a l
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Provides detailed and accurate reporting on the administrative issues found by the Supreme Court. Maintains objectivity and aligns with other sources.
Večernji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days ago The Supreme Court found serious deficiencies in the functioning of the municipal courts in two citiesThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified serious shortcomings in the operation of local courts in Šibenik and Zadar. In Šibenik, the court leadership, led by President Mirko Škarica, was found to have negatively impacted judicial efficiency due to inadequate oversight of judges' work, poor organization of cases, and failure to address backlog issues. This included delays in handling criminal matters, such as the case of Drniš murderer Kristijan Aleksić, where no judicial action was taken for over two years after the indictment was confirmed in December 2023. The report notes that these deficiencies stem from years of neglect under Škarica’s leadership. In Zadar, the court also faced significant challenges, including strained relationships between judges and administrative staff, which further hindered operations. The Supreme Court has ordered both court presidents to implement corrective measures within 15 days.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from an official oversight process conducted by the Supreme Court, focusing on operational inefficiencies and internal management issues within local courts. It does not take a partisan stance but reports on systemic problems and their implications for judicial function
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Matches other reports on the Supreme Court's findings, providing clear and factual information about the deficiencies in court administration. Maintains an objective tone throughout.
Jutarnji listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified significant shortcomings in the operations of local courts in Šibenik and Zadar. The oversight revealed that the president of the Šibenik Local Court, Mirko Škarica, had negatively impacted the efficiency of court work due to years of neglect in managing judicial administration. The court criticized his failure to adequately supervise judges, organize case distribution, and address backlog cases. In Šibenik, delays were noted in handling criminal matters, including a case involving the murder of Kristijan Aleksić, where no judicial action was taken for over two years after the indictment was confirmed in December 2023. The report also highlighted deteriorated interpersonal relationships among judges and administrative staff at the Zadar court, which further hindered its functioning. The Supreme Court emphasized that these issues stem from prolonged mismanagement rather than recent developments.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an objective assessment of systemic failures within local courts based on findings by the Supreme Court. It does not take a partisan stance but reports on institutional inefficiencies and their impacts. While the content is politically sensitive due to its implications for the司法
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Accurately summarizes the Supreme Court's report on judicial inefficiencies. The article remains neutral and factual, aligning closely with other sources.
Telegram.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified numerous failures in the operation of local courts in Šibenik and Zadar, including significant issues in judicial administration and case management. In Šibenik, the court leadership highlighted systemic inefficiencies, particularly under the presidency of Mirko Škarica, who was found to have negatively impacted the efficiency of court operations due to prolonged neglect. The report specifically mentions the case of Drniš murderer Kristijan Aleksić, where over two years passed without any judicial action after the indictment was confirmed in November 2023. Additionally, the court noted severe interpersonal conflicts between judges and administrative staff at the Zadar court, which further hindered its functioning. These findings were presented by Supreme Court President Mirta Matić, who ordered corrective measures within 15 days.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual findings from the Supreme Court regarding administrative and operational failures in local courts, without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific political figures or parties. While the issue of judicial inefficiency is politically sensitive, the tone remains neutral,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Consistently reports on the findings of the Supreme Court inspection, presenting the facts clearly and objectively without introducing bias or subjective commentary.
Net.hrIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe article reports on findings by the Supreme Court's inspection regarding significant deficiencies in the operation of local courts in Šibenik and Zadar. The inspection revealed multiple irregularities in judicial administration, particularly at the Šibenik court where President Mirko Škarica was criticized for inadequate oversight of judges, poor organization of cases, and failure to address backlog issues. Notably, the case of Drniš murder suspect Kristijan Aleksić was highlighted, where over two years passed without any judicial action after the indictment was confirmed. The report also mentions strained relationships between judges and court staff in Zadar, which further hampers court functionality. The Supreme Court has ordered corrective measures within 15 days.
Bias read (Center): The article presents an objective assessment of administrative failures within the judiciary, focusing on procedural shortcomings rather than ideological positions. While the subject matter involves governance and legal accountability, there is no overt partisan framing. The tone remains neutral, as
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Reports on the findings of the Supreme Court inspection with precision and objectivity. Aligns with other sources and presents the facts without bias.
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified significant shortcomings in the operations of the municipal courts in Šibenik and Zadar. The court ordered the presidents of these courts to implement corrective measures within 15 days. In Šibenik, the court found numerous irregularities in the work of the judicial administration, including failures by President Mirko Škarica to effectively manage court operations, organize judges' schedules, and address unresolved cases. Notably, there were serious delays in handling criminal cases, such as the trial of Kristijan Aleksić, where no judicial action was taken for over two years after the indictment was confirmed in November 2023. The report highlights that these issues stem from long-standing neglect by the court president. In Zadar, the Supreme Court noted severe disruptions in interpersonal relationships between some judges and the court administration, further complicating the court's functioning. The court criticized the removal of traffic offense references from certain permanent offices, which hinders citizens' access to justice and adds pressure on police resources.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from the Supreme Court regarding operational inefficiencies and internal conflicts in two municipal courts. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The content focuses on factual reports of judicial oversight and does not
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Reports on the findings of the Supreme Court inspection with accuracy and consistency. Maintains an objective tone and avoids any biased interpretation.
tportalIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified serious shortcomings in the administration of justice at the Šibenik and Zadar courts. In Šibenik, the court leadership criticized the president of the Municipal Court, Mirko Škarica, for years of negligence in managing judicial affairs, leading to inefficiency and delays, including in the case of the murder of Kristijan Aleksić. The court noted that these issues stem from past mismanagement rather than recent failures. It emphasized that the court’s dysfunction was exacerbated by the suspension of three judges and the lack of coordination among staff. In Zadar, the court highlighted deteriorated relationships between judges and administrative staff, which hindered operations. The court also condemned the abolition of penalty referrals in permanent offices in Pag, Benkovac, and Biograd na Moru, which impeded access to justice and increased police workload.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from the Supreme Court regarding systemic issues within local courts without overtly endorsing or criticizing specific political factions. While the content involves governance and judicial accountability—key political topics—the tone remains objective, focusing on the績
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Consistent with other sources, this article accurately reflects the Supreme Court's findings on administrative failures at the Šibenik court. It maintains neutrality and presents facts without bias.
N1 HrvatskaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 855 days agoThe Supreme Court of Croatia has identified significant shortcomings in the operations of local courts in Šibenik and Zadar. The court concluded that the president of the Šibenik Local Court, Mirko Škarica, had negatively impacted the efficiency of judicial work due to long-term failures in managing court administration. These included inadequate supervision of judges, poor scheduling, and failure to address pending cases. Notably, the case of the murder of Kristijan Aleksić in Drniš was delayed for over two years without any judicial action. The report also highlighted deteriorated interpersonal relationships among judges and administrative staff at the Zadar Local Court, which further hindered its functioning. The court emphasized that these issues were not recent but rather the result of prolonged negligence by the court presidents.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from an official oversight process conducted by the Supreme Court, focusing on administrative inefficiencies and internal conflicts within local courts. It does not take a partisan stance, nor does it promote specific political agendas. The tone remains objective, based
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 85): Accurately reflects the Supreme Court's findings on judicial inefficiencies. The article remains neutral and factual, matching other reliable sources.
Novi listIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 805 days agoThe Supreme Court has identified serious deficiencies in the operations of the municipal courts in Šibenik and Zadar. The court ordered the presidents of these courts to implement corrective measures within 15 days. In Šibenik, the court highlighted numerous irregularities in the work of the judicial administration, particularly under President Mirko Škarica, who has been in office since 2021. The report noted significant delays in processing cases, including the unresolved case involving the Drniš murderer Kristijan Aleksić, where no judicial action was taken for over two years after the indictment was confirmed in November 2023. The issues were attributed to long-standing failures in managing court operations and neglecting administrative duties by the court president. In Zadar, the Supreme Court emphasized severely damaged interpersonal relationships between some judges and the court administration, which further hindered the functioning of the court. The report criticized the removal of traffic offense reference points in certain areas, making access to justice more difficult for citizens.
Bias read (Center): The article presents findings from the Supreme Court regarding operational inefficiencies and internal conflicts in local courts. It does not exhibit overtly biased language or selective sourcing. The content focuses on factual reports of judicial shortcomings without apparent ideological framing.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 80): The article accurately reports on the findings of the Supreme Court inspection regarding administrative issues at local courts in Šibenik and Zadar. It provides specific details about the shortcomings, including the case of Kristijan Aleksić. However, it lacks some contextual information from other
HRT (Hrvatska radiotelevizija)State / PublicCenterFactual 40Objective 603 days ago Working from home increasingly popular in Europe, Croatia among conservativesThe article discusses the growing trend of working from home across Europe, noting that Croatia remains relatively conservative compared to other countries. It highlights both advantages and disadvantages of remote work, such as increased comfort and reduced commuting, but also challenges like isolation and lack of self-discipline. The piece includes personal stories from individuals in Zadar and Šibenik who either benefit from or face difficulties with remote work. Two female architects in Zagreb describe their flexible work arrangements, using video calls and alternating between home and office. The article concludes by stating that while some countries like the Netherlands, Iceland, and Finland prefer remote work most, Croatia ranks lower on this scale.
Bias read (Center): While the article touches on societal trends and labor practices, which could fall under politics, it does not take an overtly ideological stance. It presents multiple perspectives—both positive and negative aspects of remote work—and includes diverse voices from different regions of Croatia. Thereʼ
Why these scores (Factual 40 · Objective 60): This article discusses remote work popularity but diverges significantly from the main topic of court inefficiencies. It contains anecdotal stories and does not align with the cross-source consensus on judicial performance issues.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
Croatia
