Anti-corruption2026 is back: the public is waiting for new footage whose pants are shaking?
The website anti-corruption2026.com has reappeared online, sparking public interest and speculation about who might appear in new video footage. The site previously released videos before the last parliamentary elections that exposed members of Slovenia’s leftist political circles as part of a corrupt network. These videos detailed allegations such as media bribery, acceptance of bribes, corruption in state-owned companies, and their privatization. Several notable individuals were implicated, including former Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, lawyer Nina Zidar Klemenčič, lobbyist Rok Hodej, and others linked to the transitional left. The site originally planned ten appendices, but only five had been published before it was taken offline. Now back online, the timing coincides with the run-up to four upcoming referendums on important issues like parliamentary inquiry laws, TV contributions, voting rights for foreigners at local elections, and conditions for social welfare tied to volunteer work. Public reaction on social media suggests anticipation and concern over potential revelations.
The website anti-corruption2026.com has become accessible again, reigniting public interest and speculation about its potential new content. The site previously surfaced ahead of recent parliamentary elections, offering video recordings that allegedly exposed the transitional left as part of an organized corruption network. Now, with the platform back online, questions arise about who might appear in upcoming footage. The website initially emerged before the last parliamentary elections, allowing the entire Slovenian public to view individuals from the left political scene discussing how their faction operates. Topics included media bribery for favorable reporting, accepting bribes, corruption within state-owned companies, and their privatization. Prominent figures generally associated with the left have reportedly confirmed details previously reported in the media, providing validation to long-standing allegations. Among those captured in the earlier videos were former minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, lawyer Nina Zidar Klemenčič, Jože Oberstar, press representative and lobbyist Rok Hodej, former general director of Gen Energija Dejan Paravan, and Tomislav Vukmanović, who was employed at the Croatian branch of GEN-I when the footage was recorded. The site had planned for ten appendices, five of which had been released before the site was taken offline. It has now returned to the internet. Švarc Pipan revealed her ongoing connections with the wife of former prime minister Robert Golob, Tino Gaber, intelligence officer Damir Črnčec, and other figures within the transitional left. Zidar Klemenčič disclosed that Ljubljana mayor Zoran Janković takes 10 percent from municipal affairs, while Paravan explained Golob's inclination towards privatizing GEN-I. Hodej detailed how media bribery functions. It remains unclear whether new footage will be released, but the mere fact that the website is once again accessible is significant. This development occurs during the pre-referendum period, with four referendums scheduled for October 11. These will address the fate of the law on parliamentary investigation, RTV contribution, voting rights for foreigners in local elections, and conditions for social assistance through community service. Intense campaigning and media confrontations are anticipated, focusing voters' attention on politics, with local elections also approaching. The return of the website has sparked discussions on social networks. One user wrote, "Bravo, I'm just waiting for the new appendix." Another commented, "This is a warning to the left. Now we'll see who doesn't respond, they're on the videos." A third noted, "The preamble of the StKOK is already written." The website's reappearance comes amid heightened political activity and scrutiny, with implications potentially reaching several high-profile individuals. The timing suggests strategic intent, aligning with critical electoral periods and referendums. As the situation unfolds, further developments could significantly impact political dynamics and public perception.
Go to the primary sources (2)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The website anti-corruption2026.com has reappeared online, sparking public interest and speculation about who might appear in new video footage. The site previously released videos before the last parliamentary elections that exposed members of Slovenia’s leftist political circles as part of a corrupt network. These videos detailed allegations such as media bribery, acceptance of bribes, corruption in state-owned companies, and their privatization. Several notable individuals were implicated, including former Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, lawyer Nina Zidar Klemenčič, lobbyist Rok Hodej, and others linked to the transitional left. The site originally planned ten appendices, but only five had been published before it was taken offline. Now back online, the timing coincides with the run-up to four upcoming referendums on important issues like parliamentary inquiry laws, TV contributions, voting rights for foreigners at local elections, and conditions for social welfare tied to volunteer work. Public reaction on social media suggests anticipation and concern over potential revelations.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the return of the anti-corruption website as a significant development during a politically charged period ahead of multiple referendums. It emphasizes the exposure of leftist figures and implies that the content could influence voter behavior, suggesting a focus on holding left-w
Why factuality (75): The article reports on the re-emergence of the anti-corruption2026 website, which contains leaked videos allegedly exposing corruption within the left-wing political faction. It lists specific individuals involved and describes the content of the videos. While there is no primary source document, th
Why objectivity (60): The tone is sensationalistic, using phrases like 'docela razkrinkali' (completely exposed) and 'komu se tresejo hlače?' (who is shaking their pants?), which suggest a biased or provocative stance. The article presents the allegations as confirmed facts without sufficient evidence, leaning towards a
The website anti-corruption2026.com has become accessible again after being taken offline earlier. This site previously released video recordings that exposed members of Slovenia's 'transition left' as part of an organized corruption network. The videos revealed discussions among known individuals associated with the left political spectrum regarding bribery of media, acceptance of bribes, and corruption within state-owned companies and their privatization. Notable figures such as former Minister Dominika Švarc Pipan, lawyer Nina Zidar Klemenčič, and others were implicated. The website had planned ten appendices, five of which were already published before it was removed. Now, with the site back online, speculation arises about whether new content will be released. This timing coincides with the period leading up to four upcoming referendums on October 11, which could influence voter attention and political dynamics.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on exposing alleged corruption within the left-wing political sphere, using specific examples of individuals linked to the 'transition left.' The tone suggests skepticism toward these figures and highlights their potential vulnerability, aligning more closely with a left-leaning,
Why factuality (75): This article mirrors the first in content, reporting on the re-emergence of the anti-corruption2026 site and the alleged exposure of corruption. It includes similar details about the individuals involved and the nature of the leaks. Again, there is no primary source, but the information is consisten
Why objectivity (60): The language remains emotionally charged, with similar phrasing such as 'docela razkrinkali' and rhetorical questions implying judgment. The article does not present alternative viewpoints or challenge the allegations, maintaining a one-sided perspective that favors the anti-corruption narrative.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
