ON
← Back to feed
An eyebrow-raising question: Katja Kokot asks the government how Slovenia is involved in "artificial weather manipulation"
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter16 days ago

An eyebrow-raising question: Katja Kokot asks the government how Slovenia is involved in "artificial weather manipulation"

Poslanka Resnice Katja Kokot je naslovila vlado z vprašanjem o umetnem vplivanju na vreme in geoinženiringu, kar je povzročilo reakcijo v Dnevnikovi satirični rubriki. Vprašanje vključuje zahtevo za pregledno predstavitev dejavnosti, dovoljenj in nadzora teh tehnologij v Sloveniji. Kokot zahteva celovit in medresorsko usklajen odgovor z konkretne podlage. Satirična rubrika je zapisala, da so bili zaskrbljeni zaradi kompleksnosti vprašanja, kar je spodbudilo Kokot, da je odgovorila na družbenem omrežju, izražajoč pomisleke o nerazgledanosti novinarjev.

Slovenian parliamentarian Katja Kokot has raised concerns over whether Slovenia is involved in activities related to artificial weather modification and geoengineering. The question, which has sparked public interest, was directed at the government during a parliamentary session. Kokot, a member of the Resilience party, asked the government to clarify its role in such potentially controversial practices. The inquiry comes amid growing public curiosity and debate surrounding the possibility of human intervention in weather patterns and environmental processes. Kokot highlighted that while Slovenia already engages in air defense operations against hailstorms, there are questions about other forms of weather manipulation, including the use of geoengineering techniques and technologies aimed at altering atmospheric conditions for defensive purposes. In her written question to the government, Kokot listed several specific inquiries. She asked whether Slovenia had permitted, commissioned, funded, or participated in any programs, research, experiments, or other activities involving artificial influence on weather, clouds, precipitation, hail, temperature, solar radiation, or other atmospheric processes in the last decade. She also sought information on whether Slovenia, the Slovenian Armed Forces, or other state institutions were participating in any NATO, European Union, or international organization projects related to weather modification, geoengineering, or the use of environmental processes for defense and security purposes. Additionally, Kokot requested clarification on how such activities are regulated in Slovenia, including the legal basis, permits, documentation, reports, measurement results, and links to publicly accessible documents. She emphasized the need for a comprehensive and interdepartmentally coordinated response, with each question addressed separately. The question generated some surprise and even humor in media circles. A satirical column in Dnevnik joked that the editorial team was left speechless by Kokot's inquiry, imagining the bureaucratic challenges faced by government officials tasked with providing a detailed answer. However, Kokot took issue with the tone of the piece and responded on social media, expressing frustration with what she perceived as a lack of understanding among journalists. She pointed out that anti-hail defense measures are well known and represent a typical example of weather modification. She noted that countries such as China and Dubai openly acknowledge various methods of weather modification and cited academic work, including a diploma thesis, to support her claims. Kokot argued that the topic is not new and that there is existing scholarly literature on the subject. Her inquiry reflects broader global discussions around climate engineering and the ethical implications of manipulating weather systems. While some governments have explored these technologies for agricultural or disaster mitigation purposes, others view them with skepticism due to potential environmental risks. Kokot’s question has prompted calls for transparency regarding Slovenia’s involvement in such initiatives. It also highlights the increasing public awareness and scrutiny of technological interventions in natural processes, especially as climate change continues to shape policy debates worldwide. The government has yet to formally respond to Kokot’s inquiry, though officials are expected to provide a detailed reply in the coming weeks. The response will likely involve collaboration between multiple ministries and agencies responsible for environmental regulation, defense, and scientific research. As the discussion unfolds, it could lead to further parliamentary debates and public discourse on the balance between national security interests, environmental protection, and the ethical considerations of weather modification technologies. The outcome of this inquiry may influence future policies and regulations governing such activities in Slovenia.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 97Objective 9416 days ago
An eyebrow-raising question: Katja Kokot asks the government how Slovenia is involved in "artificial weather manipulation"

Poslanka Resnice Katja Kokot je naslovila vlado z vprašanjem o umetnem vplivanju na vreme in geoinženiringu, kar je povzročilo reakcijo v Dnevnikovi satirični rubriki. Vprašanje vključuje zahtevo za pregledno predstavitev dejavnosti, dovoljenj in nadzora teh tehnologij v Sloveniji. Kokot zahteva celovit in medresorsko usklajen odgovor z konkretne podlage. Satirična rubrika je zapisala, da so bili zaskrbljeni zaradi kompleksnosti vprašanja, kar je spodbudilo Kokot, da je odgovorila na družbenem omrežju, izražajoč pomisleke o nerazgledanosti novinarjev.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a parliamentary inquiry into a technical and scientific issue with potential national implications, but does not take a clear ideological stance. The framing remains neutral, focusing on transparency and accountability rather than promoting a specific political agenda. While the

Why factuality (97): The article accurately summarizes the primary source document, including Kokot's question about artificial weather influence and geoengineering. It includes direct quotes from the original text and does not add any unsupported information or misrepresent the content.

Why objectivity (94): The tone is neutral and journalistic, presenting the facts without overt bias or emotional language. The article frames Kokot's questions objectively, though it uses a slightly curious phrasing ('dviguje obrvi') which is common in news reporting but doesn't distort the facts.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories