Voters from abroad slapped Janša

Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 1002 days ago

The State Election Commission has finalized the results of four recent referendums held in Slovenia. Voters rejected a proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary investigations by a margin of 51.36% against 48.64%. In a closely contested advisory vote, voters voted to retain the mandatory public broadcasting fee, with 50.15% opposing its abolition compared to 49.85% supporting it. The remaining two advisory referendums saw clear majorities support conditioning cash social assistance on community service work at 60.48% and removing voting rights for third-country nationals in local elections at 55.24%. Overall voter turnout across all four referendums was recorded at 54.8%, with varying numbers of invalid ballots cast.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward report of final election results using precise percentages and raw vote counts provided by the State Election Commission. It avoids loaded adjectives, omits commentary on the implications of the results, and does not favor any particular political stance among

Why factuality (100): Identical in content to Article 3, providing the exact same verified statistics and outcomes. The attribution to STA (Slovenian Press Agency) further supports the high level of factual reliability. All figures correspond to the consensus of the other reliable sources.

Why objectivity (100): Like Article 3, this piece is completely neutral. It reports the facts of the election commission's update without injecting any perspective, emotion, or bias. The structure is straightforward and dispassionate.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 100Objective 1002 days ago

The State Election Commission finalized the results of four referendums held in Slovenia on October 21, 2026, confirming that the outcomes remained unchanged after the final update. In the legislative referendum regarding a new law on parliamentary investigations, 51.36% of voters rejected the amendment, preventing its implementation. The consultative referendum concerning the abolition of the mandatory public broadcasting fee was extremely close, with 50.15% voting against abolition by a margin of just 2,859 votes. Two other consultative referendums showed clearer majorities: 60.48% supported conditioning cash social assistance on community service, and 55.24% voted to remove voting rights for third-country nationals in local elections. Voter turnout across all four referendums stood at 54.8%, with the highest number of invalid ballots recorded in the legislative vote.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward, data-driven report of election results using neutral language. It cites specific percentages and vote counts for both sides of each issue without employing loaded adjectives, expressing opinions, or omitting significant context. The tone is purely informative,

Why factuality (100): This article mirrors the factual content of Articles 3 and 4 exactly. It cites the State Election Commission's final update and lists the identical percentages and vote totals. There are no discrepancies with the established facts of the event.

Why objectivity (100): The tone is strictly neutral and informative. It avoids any commentary on the significance of the results or the political implications, sticking solely to the reported data from the official source.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 100Objective 1002 days ago

The State Election Commission released final results for four referendums held in Slovenia, confirming that voters rejected a proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary investigations. In a narrow margin, voters also voted against abolishing the mandatory public broadcasting fee, with support for keeping the fee exceeding opposition by approximately 2,859 votes. Conversely, a majority supported conditioning cash social assistance on community service work and removing voting rights from third-country nationals in local elections. The overall voter turnout across all referendums was recorded at 54.8 percent, with the highest number of invalid ballots cast during the legislative referendum.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a strictly factual report of election results using precise percentages and vote counts provided by the State Election Commission. It avoids loaded language, editorial commentary, or selective emphasis, presenting both 'for' and 'against' figures equally for each measure. This中立

Why factuality (100): Consistent with Articles 3, 4, and 5, this article reports the final, unchanged results with precise numerical data. The information is verifiable against the consensus of multiple independent news outlets covering the same event.

Why objectivity (100): The presentation is entirely dispassionate. It serves as a pure news brief, delivering the outcome of the referendum update without any stylistic flourishes or ideological coloring.

MladinaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 1005 days ago

The results of four recent referendums in Slovenia remain unchanged after postal votes from abroad were added. The most significant change was at the referendum on abolishing the television license fee, where the margin between 'for' and 'against' increased by over 2,600 votes. Voters decided on constitutional amendments related to parliamentary inquiry procedures, abolishing the TV license, conditional social benefits through community service, and voting rights for foreigners. According to the State Electoral Commission, voter turnout reached 54.78%. The proposal to condition social assistance on community service received the strongest support, with 60.52% of voters in favor. Meanwhile, the majority rejected the proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, with 51.35% against it. The closest result was on the TV license abolition, where 51.14% voted against it, with a difference of 2,633 votes. Approximately 1,400 ballots were sent overseas, and 30 polling stations were open at diplomatic-consular offices.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on referendum outcomes without overtly biased language or selective emphasis. It reports both sides of each issue and provides numerical results without apparent ideological framing. The tone remains neutral, focusing on statistical changes rather than interpreting

Why factuality (95): This article covers an earlier stage of the result counting (October 19 vs Oct 21 in others). The numbers cited here (e.g., 51.14% against RTV abolition) reflect the interim count before foreign votes were fully integrated, which explains the slight difference from the final 50.15% figure in later a

Why objectivity (100): The report is neutral and factual. It objectively describes the process of adding postal votes and updates the reader on the current state of the tally without speculation or bias.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

The State Electoral Commission (DVK) has updated the results of Sunday's referendums in Slovenia, including postal voting results identified by local electoral commissions. The updated data slightly increased the margin in favor of opponents of abolishing the TV license fee (rtv-prispevka). According to the latest figures published by DVK at 8:40 AM today, 461,483 voters (49.93%) supported the abolition of the TV license fee, while 462,837 voters (50.07%) opposed it, a difference of 1,354 votes. This contrasts with Monday’s earlier count, which showed a smaller gap of 546 votes. The updated results include corrections made by local electoral commissions after identifying incorrect data entries. Other referendums held on Sunday, on amending the law on parliamentary inquiry, conditional social assistance through community service, and revoking the voting rights of citizens of other countries, did not change their outcomes. Voter turnout across all referendums stands at 54.6%. These are unofficial results based on 99.98% of counted ballots, with DVK set to finalize results from overseas votes on Monday.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates to referendum results without overtly favoring any side. It includes both pro and against positions regarding the TV license fee and provides statistical data without editorializing or biased language. The focus is on procedural updates and corrections ratherthan

Why factuality (95): This article also accurately reflects the updated results from the DVK, including postal votes and corrections made by local electoral commissions. The figures match those found in other articles, indicating strong cross-source agreement.

Why objectivity (90): The tone remains neutral and factual throughout the piece, presenting the information objectively without any discernible bias or subjective commentary.

N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

The State Electoral Commission (DVK) has updated the results of Sunday's referendums, including postal voting results in Slovenia. The updated data increased the margin in favor of those opposing the abolition of the RTV contribution. According to the latest figures released by the DVK at 8:40 AM, 461,483 voters (49.93%) supported the abolition of the RTV contribution, while 462,837 voters (50.07%) opposed it, a difference of 1,354 votes. Previously, the difference was 546 votes. The updated results include corrections identified by local electoral commissions regarding incorrect data entries. The referendum also included decisions on implementing a new law on parliamentary inquiry, conditional social assistance through community service, and the revocation of voting rights for citizens of other countries. These results remain unchanged. Voter turnout stands at 54.6%, based on counted 99.98% of ballots. The DVK will continue processing results from abroad on Monday.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates to referendum results without apparent ideological framing. It includes both pro and con outcomes and provides context about the correction process. There is no evident bias toward either side of the issue.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately conveys the updated results from the DVK, incorporating postal voting and corrections identified by local electoral commissions. The numerical data corresponds closely with what has been reported elsewhere.

Why objectivity (90): The presentation is balanced and objective, sticking strictly to the facts without injecting personal opinion or biased language.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

The results of the advisory referendum on the abolition of the RTV contribution in Slovenia show a narrow margin between those who voted for and against the proposal. According to the latest data from the State Election Commission (DVK), 461,483 voters supported the abolition, while 462,837 opposed it, resulting in a difference of 1,354 votes. The gap slightly narrowed to 546 votes after updated figures were released on Monday, which included postal voting results and corrections to earlier data entries. In addition to this advisory referendum, voters also decided on three other issues: the implementation of a new law on parliamentary inquiry, conditional social assistance through community service, and the revocation of voting rights for citizens of other countries. The turnout across all referendums was 54.6 percent based on 99.98 percent of counted ballots.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual results of multiple referendums without apparent ideological framing. It provides both pro and con vote counts, mentions the slight shift in the RTV contribution referendum result, and includes context about the inclusion of postal votes and data corrections. There is no

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the updated results from the DVK, including postal votes and corrections made by local electoral commissions. The numbers presented are consistent with those found in other articles.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains an objective stance, delivering the information in a neutral manner without showing favoritism towards either side of the issue.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 95Objective 908 days ago

On October 11, 2026, Slovenia held a referendum on whether to abolish the mandatory TV contribution (RTV-prispevek). The State Electoral Commission (DVK) later corrected the results, revealing that 50.07% of voters opposed abolishing the fee, while 49.93% supported it. The difference between the two sides was 1,354 votes, with more people voting against the abolition. The referendum cost approximately 9 million euros, though the exact final amount remains unknown. Local communities nominated members for polling stations, with the SDS party proposing the most candidates, followed by Freedom, Social Democrats (SD), New Slovenia (NSi), and the Left.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data from the State Electoral Commission without overtly biased language or selective sourcing. It reports both sides of the referendum outcome and provides context on costs and voter participation without emphasizing one perspective over another.

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the updated results from the DVK, including postal votes and corrections made by local electoral commissions. The numbers presented are consistent with those found in other articles.

Why objectivity (90): The article maintains a neutral tone, providing factual updates without showing preference for either side of the debate regarding the RTV contribution.

DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 95Objective 858 days ago

The State Electoral Commission (DVK) has updated the results of Sunday's referendums in Slovenia, including postal voting data. The updated figures show that opposition to the abolition of the mandatory TV license fee (rtv-prispevek) received 462,837 votes (50.07% of voters), which is 1,354 more than those in favor. This increases the margin between the two sides slightly. The updates were made after local electoral commissions identified incorrect data entries. Other referendums held on Sunday included a constitutional amendment regarding parliamentary inquiry, conditional social assistance through community service, and the revocation of voting rights for citizens of other countries. These latter referendums did not change their outcomes. Voter turnout across all referendums stands at 54.6%, based on 99.98% of ballots counted. The DVK will continue processing international ballot returns on Monday.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates to referendum results without overtly favoring any side. It includes both pro and against vote counts, provides context about data corrections by local electoral commissions, and mentions multiple referendums without emphasizing any particular outcome. There is a

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the updated results from the DVK, including postal votes and corrections made by local electoral commissions. The numbers presented are consistent with those found in other articles.

Why objectivity (85): While the article is mostly factual, there is a slight leaning toward emphasizing the increase in opposition to the abolition of the RTV contribution, though this does not significantly affect overall neutrality.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 808 days ago

The State Electoral Commission (DVK) has updated the results of Sunday's advisory referendum on the abolition of the mandatory TV license fee (RTV contribution). The latest data includes postal voting results in Slovenia and corrections for incorrect entries identified by local electoral commissions. According to the updated figures, 461,483 voters (49.93%) supported the abolition of the RTV contribution, while 462,837 voters (50.07%) opposed it, a difference of 1,354 votes against the abolition. This represents a significant shift compared to earlier reports, which showed a smaller margin. The updated results reflect adjustments made after identifying errors in data entry. The final results are still pending, as votes cast abroad have yet to be counted.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates on referendum results without overtly favoring any side. It provides both pro and con vote counts, acknowledges data corrections, and notes that the final outcome remains uncertain due to uncounted overseas ballots. There is no evident ideological framing or bias

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the updated results from the DVK, including postal votes and corrections made by local electoral commissions. The numbers presented are consistent with those found in other articles.

Why objectivity (80): The article shows some bias through its headline and the way it frames the increased support for maintaining the RTV contribution, although the body of the text remains largely factual.

Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

The results of four recent referendums in Slovenia were influenced by mail-in votes from abroad, according to the State Electoral Commission (DVK). The final results showed that the difference in votes for the referendum on abolishing the RTV contribution increased by over 2,600 votes after these additional ballots were counted. Voters decided on four issues: a constitutional amendment to parliamentary inquiry law, abolishing the RTV contribution, conditional social assistance through community service, and voting rights for foreigners at local elections. The highest support was for conditional social assistance through community service, with 60.52% of voters in favor. Most voters opposed the new parliamentary inquiry law, with 51.35% against it. The closest result was on the RTV contribution abolition, where 51.14% voted against it. Before counting overseas votes, the margin was 1,354 votes. Approximately 1,400 ballots were sent abroad, and 30 polling stations were open at diplomatic-consular offices during the referendum weekend. The DVK stated that the results are not yet final.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on referendum outcomes and their changes due to overseas votes. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The tone remains neutral, focusing on statistical updates and procedural information provided by the DVK.

Why factuality (90): The article contains accurate statistical information about the referendum results including percentages and vote margins. It accurately describes the process of counting overseas ballots and their impact on the final outcome.

Why objectivity (85): The reporting is largely neutral, focusing on factual outcomes rather than taking a stance on the issues. It presents the results objectively without apparent bias or emotional language.

Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

The difference in votes for the referendum on abolishing the TV license fee has increased further after postal ballots from abroad were counted. The four referendums held last week saw voters decide on the fate of a new law on parliamentary inquiry, as well as three advisory referendums on abolishing the TV license fee, conditional social assistance through community service, and voting rights for foreigners. According to data published by the State Electoral Commission today, voter turnout was 54.78%. The majority supported conditional social assistance through community service, with 60.52% voting in favor. Most also supported the recent abolition of voting rights for citizens of other countries at local elections, with 55.2% supporting this measure. However, the majority rejected the proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, with 51.35% voting against it. The result for the TV license fee referendum was the closest, with 51.14% voting against its abolition, which was 2,633 votes more than those in favor. Before counting overseas ballots, the margin was 1,354 votes. Approximately 1,400 ballots were sent abroad, and 30 polling stations were open at diplomatic-consulr

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual results of multiple referendums without overtly biased language or emphasis. It reports both sides of the outcomes and provides context about the referendums' topics and the current state of the vote counts. There is no clear ideological framing or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (90): The article provides precise statistical information about the referendum results including percentages and vote margins. It accurately describes the process of counting overseas ballots and their impact on the final outcome.

Why objectivity (85): The reporting is largely neutral, focusing on factual outcomes rather than taking a stance on the issues. It presents the results objectively without apparent bias or emotional language.

DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

The results of four recent referendums in Slovenia remain unchanged after adding postal votes from abroad and diplomatic-consular offices. The most significant change was an increase in the margin between 'for' and 'against' votes on the referendum regarding the abolition of the RTV contribution, which now stands at over 2600 votes. On October 11, voters decided on a constitutional amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, as well as three advisory referendums on abolishing the RTV contribution, conditional social benefits through community service, and voting rights for foreigners. According to the State Electoral Commission (DVK), voter turnout was 54.78 percent. The majority supported conditional social benefits through community service, with 60.52 percent voting in favor. Most voters opposed the proposed amendment to the parliamentary inquiry law, with 51.35 percent against it. The closest result was on the RTV contribution referendum, where 51.14 percent voted against its abolition, a difference of 2633 votes. Approximately 1400 ballots were sent overseas, and 30 polling stations were open at diplomatic-consular offices. The final results are still pending.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on referendum outcomes without overtly biased language or selective emphasis. It reports both sides of each issue and provides numerical results without apparent ideological framing. The tone remains neutral, focusing on statistical changes rather than endorsing any

Why factuality (90): The article contains accurate statistical information about the referendum results including percentages and vote margins. It accurately describes the process of counting overseas ballots and their impact on the final outcome.

Why objectivity (85): The reporting is largely neutral, focusing on factual outcomes rather than taking a stance on the issues. It presents the results objectively without apparent bias or emotional language.

RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 855 days ago

On October 19, 2026, the State Electoral Commission announced that the results of the recent referendums held the previous Sunday have not changed after counting mail-in ballots from abroad. The final results include the approval of a proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, support for conditional social assistance through community service, and opposition to the removal of voting rights for citizens of other countries and the abolition of the RTV contribution. According to the latest data from the Electoral Commission, 48.65% of voters supported the amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, while 51.35% opposed it. For the advisory referendums, 60.52% of voters supported linking social assistance to community service, 55.22% supported removing voting rights for non-citizens, and 49.86% supported abolishing the RTV contribution. Voter turnout was reported at 54.78%, but the results are still pending official confirmation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual results of referendums without overtly favoring any side. It provides statistical data and mentions the unchanged outcomes after including international mail-in votes. There is no evident framing that leans toward either political spectrum, and the tone remains neutral,

Why factuality (90): The article contains accurate statistical information about the referendum results including percentages and vote margins. It accurately describes the process of counting overseas ballots and their impact on the final outcome.

Why objectivity (85): The reporting is largely neutral, focusing on factual outcomes rather than taking a stance on the issues. It presents the results objectively without apparent bias or emotional language.

Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 90Objective 858 days ago

The State Electoral Commission (DVK) has updated the results of Sunday's referendums, including postal voting data in Slovenia. The revised figures slightly increased the margin in favor of those opposing the abolition of the radio-television contribution (rtv-prispevek). According to the latest data published by DVK at 8:40 AM, 461,483 voters (49.93%) supported the abolition, while 462,837 (50.07%) opposed it, a difference of 1,354 votes. Earlier Monday afternoon’s data showed a smaller gap of 546 votes. The updates include corrections identified by local electoral commissions regarding incorrect data entries. Other referendum results remain unchanged, including decisions on implementing a new law on parliamentary inquiry, conditional social assistance through community service, and revoking voting rights for citizens of other countries.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual updates to referendum results without overtly favoring any side. It includes both pro and con vote counts and acknowledges corrections made by electoral authorities. There is no evident framing bias, editorializing, or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (90): The article cites the Državna volilna komisija (DVK) and provides detailed vote counts, percentages, and explanations of updated results. It accurately reports the margin of victory and clarifies that some discrepancies were due to corrected data entries by local electoral commissions.

Why objectivity (85): The article presents the information objectively, focusing on the updated results and the reasons behind them. It avoids taking sides and sticks to the facts reported by the DVK, maintaining a neutral tone throughout.

Zanima.meIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 708 days ago

The first referendum week in the 10th session of the National Assembly of Slovenia resulted in narrow victories for the 'against' side in two key votes. The law on parliamentary inquiry was rejected by 51.26% against 48.74%, while the mandatory payment of RTV contribution was also defeated by a margin of 50.03% to 49.97%. These outcomes led to disappointment among the center-right coalition and their voters, who had hoped for more favorable results.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the referendum results factually, highlighting the narrow margins of defeat for the center-right coalition without overtly favoring any political side. It notes the disappointment but does not frame the outcome as biased toward one ideology over another.

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed results from four simultaneous referendums, including percentages for both sides and voter turnout. These figures align closely with the information presented in other sources, confirming the accuracy of the data. The analysis of political divisions is supported by the

Why objectivity (70): While the article presents facts objectively, it includes interpretative commentary such as 'political identity questions surpass divisions between left and right,' which introduces some subjectivity. The overall tone leans slightly toward analyzing the implications rather than remaining purely desc

DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 755 days ago

The results of four referendums held last week remain unchanged after counting postal votes from abroad. The only significant change was in the referendum on abolishing the TV license fee, where the margin increased by over 2,600 votes. Approximately 1,400 ballots were sent overseas, and 30 voting stations were open at diplomatic-consular offices. According to the State Electoral Commission (DVK), voter turnout reached 54.78%. The most supported proposal was linking social benefits to community service, with 60.52% of voters in favor. A majority opposed the new law on parliamentary inquiry, with 51.35% against it. The closest result was on abolishing the TV license fee, where 51.14% voted against it, with a difference of 2,633 votes. The final results are still pending.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual data on referendum outcomes without overtly biased language or selective emphasis. It reports both sides of each issue and provides numerical results without apparent ideological framing.

Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports on the referendum results and the impact of overseas voting. While it provides statistical details, it occasionally uses interpretive language that could suggest a particular viewpoint.

Why objectivity (75): The tone remains mostly objective but shows slight倾向 towards emphasizing the significance of the RTV contribution issue compared to other referendum topics.

Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 608 days ago

The article discusses the outcomes of four recent referendums in Slovenia and analyzes the impact of misinformation during the campaigns. It highlights how activists deliberately spread false claims, such as suggesting that a parliamentary investigation referendum was about establishing a 'political police,' which misled voters. The author criticizes mainstream media, particularly RTV Slovenia, for failing to address these falsehoods adequately. Similar tactics were used in referendums on voting rights for foreigners and conditions for social assistance, where misleading narratives influenced public opinion. The article questions the legitimacy of referendums based on false information and reflects on the broader implications for democratic processes.

Bias read (Progressive): The article critiques the misuse of freedom of speech by activists and the failure of mainstream media to challenge these falsehoods, particularly highlighting the role of RTV Slovenia. It frames the issue as a threat to democracy and implies that the current system allows manipulation through dis信息

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the referendum campaign, including claims about misinformation regarding the parliamentary investigation commission being framed as a 'political police' by activists. These claims align with the general consensus found in other articles, though some assert

Why objectivity (60): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'burna referendumska kampanja' (burning referendum campaign) and criticizes analysts and politicians for avoiding certain terms. It frames the issue as an attack on freedom of speech and implies bias among mainstream media without providing balan

Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 80Objective 759 days ago

The article reports on alleged irregularities in the recording of referendum results across several polling stations in Slovenia, including in Blagovica, Mrzlava, and others. In Blagovica, the reported results were reportedly reversed, showing support for the proposed law changes instead of opposition. Similar discrepancies were noted at other locations, such as a 101% voter turnout in Mrzlava and mismatched numbers between the voting station records and the DVK database. These inconsistencies raise concerns about potential errors or manipulation of results. The State Electoral Commission (DVK) acknowledges these issues but attributes them to the decentralized nature of the electoral process, emphasizing that individual mistakes cannot be equated with systemic fraud or intentional influence on the outcome.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual discrepancies in referendum results without overtly favoring any side. It includes multiple examples of irregularities and quotes the DVK’s explanation, maintaining neutrality by not attributing the issues to specific parties or ideologies.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the irregularities observed during the referendums, including discrepancies in vote counts at various polling stations. These findings align with other reports and are supported by specific examples.

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents facts objectively, it does include some rhetorical questions and suggestions of possible manipulation, which can be seen as slightly leaning towards skepticism about the integrity of the process.

24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 705 days ago

On Sunday, October 11, voters participated in a constitutional referendum and three advisory referendums. The most supported proposal was linking social assistance to community service, with 60.52% of voters in favor. Another measure, abolishing voting rights for citizens of other countries at local elections, received 55.22% support. However, the majority opposed the proposed amendment to the law on parliamentary inquiry, with 51.35% voting against it. The closest result was on the abolition of the RTV contribution, where opposition won by 1354 votes. After including votes from abroad, the gap widened further, with 2633 more people voting against the abolition. The ruling party SDS criticized the work of electoral authorities, with Prime Minister Janez Janša suggesting potential legal actions against the State Electoral Commission (DVK). DVK responded by emphasizing concerns over the independence of electoral institutions.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual results of multiple referendums and includes balanced quotes from both the governing party (SDS) and the State Electoral Commission (DVK). It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the raw

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports on the referendum results, including the close outcome of the RTV contribution referendum and the inclusion of votes from abroad. It aligns with other sources in reporting these details.

Why objectivity (70): The tone shows some bias in favor of the opposition, especially in referencing Janša's criticisms of the electoral commission. It presents the results without overtly favoring either side but includes some subjective commentary.