The government's Information Security Bureau claims that the Israeli cyber system has never been tested.
The Government Office for Information Security has stated that it has not yet tested the Israeli cybersecurity system known as Sphere, developed by Dream Security. The office clarified that a July meeting between its representatives and Dream Security executives, including former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, was purely presentational and did not involve any agreement to process data. This statement follows reports by the media outlet Ostro, which revealed a document suggesting a planned laboratory trial of the software using anonymized data at the SIGOV-Cert sector. Prime Minister Janez Janša denied claims made by the Institute March 8 that the government had signed a secret agreement allowing the company to use citizens' data for testing AI-driven security programs. Janša accused the institute of spreading daily lies and questioned who finances their anti-Slovenia campaign. The government emphasized that any future testing would occur exclusively on isolated test data without internet connection, ensuring state data protection.
Slovenia’s government information security office stated on Tuesday that it has not yet tested an Israeli cybersecurity tool known as Sphere. The agency clarified via its website that a July meeting with representatives of the Israeli firm Dream Security was purely presentational and informational in nature. This statement follows reports published earlier this week by the investigative online media outlet Ostro, which revealed an agreement between the state body and the private company regarding potential trials of the software. The disclosure by Ostro came on Friday, detailing a meeting held in July between officials from the government information security office and executives from Dream Security. Attendees included Prime Minister Janez Janša and Niko Gamulin, the acting director of the information security office. Also present was Sebastian Kurz, former Austrian chancellor who currently serves as co-owner and chairman of the board at Dream Security. The government office emphasized on Tuesday that it did not participate in organizing the meeting. However, a report from the session obtained by Ostro indicates that the security office agreed with the Israeli company to trial the Sphere tool within the laboratory of the SIGOV-Cert sector. In response to the publication, the information security office reiterated that any testing would strictly utilize test data or appropriately anonymized datasets. Similar assurances were previously communicated to Ostro by the prime minister’s cabinet. Officials there explained that if testing proceeds, it will occur exclusively on test data within an isolated environment devoid of internet connectivity. They stated this protocol ensures adequate protection for national data and information systems. The primary objective of such a trial, according to the office, would be to evaluate the utility of the solution and determine its potential added value in the fields of information and cyber security. The office noted that these properties cannot be assessed without conducting tests. The government body specified that no schedule has been set for the execution of any potential trial. It further stressed that the initial presentational meeting and the possibility of future testing do not constitute a decision to purchase the solution or deploy it into an operational environment. Despite these clarifications, political tensions have risen over the incident. The Institute March 8th, a local organization, published a statement claiming that the government had signed an agreement with Dream Security without informing the public. The institute alleged that this deal permits the company to use data belonging to Slovenian citizens to test their artificial intelligence-driven security programs. Prime Minister Janša rejected these accusations directly. He stated that the government has not concluded any such agreement and that no testing involving citizen data has taken place. Janša directed attention toward the funding sources of the Institute March 8th, suggesting that the organization misleads the public daily with falsehoods. He argued that the Slovenian public has the right to know who finances and directs such entities against Slovenia. Janša also referenced the country's parliamentary democracy, noting that Slovenia ended the rule of un-elected bodies through a plebiscite and constitution. He implied that the institute should limit its demands based on the number of votes it received in elections. The controversy centers on the nature of the relationship between the state security apparatus and a foreign technology provider. While the official position maintains that no operational deployment or data sharing has occurred, the existence of a documented agreement to conduct lab trials has raised questions among observers. The involvement of high-profile figures, including the current prime minister and a former European leader turned tech executive, adds a layer of diplomatic and corporate interest to the domestic security debate. The SIGOV-Cert sector, mentioned as the location for potential trials, is part of the broader infrastructure responsible for managing critical information systems in Slovenia. Dream Security, the Israeli entity involved, offers tools designed for national cyber defense. The specific product under discussion, Sphere, utilizes advanced technologies to monitor and protect digital infrastructures. The presence of Sebastian Kurz, who transitioned from politics to business leadership after his tenure as Austrian chancellor, highlights the international network surrounding the company. His participation in the July meeting alongside Janša and Gamulin suggests a direct channel of communication between the top levels of the Slovenian government and the firm’s leadership. The government’s insistence on the isolated nature of any future testing aims to address privacy concerns. By specifying that the environment would lack internet access and rely solely on anonymized or synthetic data, officials seek to distinguish the proposed trial from actual surveillance operations. However, critics remain focused on the initial agreement itself, viewing the willingness to engage in such trials as a step toward integration of foreign technology into sensitive state networks. The lack of a defined timeline for the tests leaves the situation in a state of pending review, with the government maintaining that no final decisions have been made regarding procurement or implementation. The exchange between the government and the Institute March 8th underscores the sensitivity of the issue. Accusations of secret deals and unauthorized data usage stand in sharp contrast to the official denials of any such arrangements. As the debate continues, the focus remains on whether the technical safeguards promised by the administration are sufficient to allay public fears regarding the handling of national security data. The outcome of this episode will likely depend on whether the planned laboratory trials ever move forward and how transparent the process becomes if they do. For now, the official record stands that the Sphere system remains untested in Slovenia.
Go to the primary sources (1)
The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.
The Government Office for Information Security has stated that it has not yet tested the Israeli cybersecurity system known as Sphere, developed by Dream Security. The office clarified that a July meeting between its representatives and Dream Security executives, including former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, was purely presentational and did not involve any agreement to process data. This statement follows reports by the media outlet Ostro, which revealed a document suggesting a planned laboratory trial of the software using anonymized data at the SIGOV-Cert sector. Prime Minister Janez Janša denied claims made by the Institute March 8 that the government had signed a secret agreement allowing the company to use citizens' data for testing AI-driven security programs. Janša accused the institute of spreading daily lies and questioned who finances their anti-Slovenia campaign. The government emphasized that any future testing would occur exclusively on isolated test data without internet connection, ensuring state data protection.
Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the controversy through the lens of Prime Minister Janša’s strong denial and his accusation that the opposing group is lying and acting against national interests. It highlights the government's defensive stance regarding data privacy and sovereignty, aligning with a right-leaning
Why factuality (90): This article provides a clear, concise summary of the official response. All factual claims (dates, names, nature of the meeting, status of testing) match the consensus from the other three articles exactly. There are no discrepancies or missing key details in the visible portion.
Why objectivity (95): The tone is strictly neutral and informational. It reports the statements made by the government office and the context provided by the investigative outlet without adding adjectives, judgments, or emotional language. It presents both sides (the revelation vs. the official denial/explanation) evenly
The Slovenian Government Office for Information Security has clarified that it has not yet tested the cybersecurity tool 'Sphere' developed by the Israeli firm Dream Security. The office stated that a July meeting between representatives of the agency and Dream Security was purely informational in nature. This disclosure follows an investigative report by the online medium Ostro, which revealed the agreement to conduct laboratory tests for the tool at the SIGOV-Cert sector. Both the information security office and Prime Minister Janez Janša's cabinet emphasized that any future testing would occur exclusively in an isolated environment using anonymized data to ensure national data protection. Officials noted that the purpose of such a trial would be to evaluate the solution's utility and added value, while stressing that the presentation and potential testing do not constitute a decision to purchase or implement the system operationally.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward factual update regarding a government agency's clarification on cybersecurity procurement processes. It relies heavily on direct quotes from official sources (the Government Office for Information Security and the PM's cabinet) to explain the status of the 'in'
Why factuality (90): Consistent with the other articles, this piece accurately conveys the core facts: the July meeting was informational, the tool has not been tested, and any future tests would be isolated. The attribution of quotes and events is precise and matches the cross-source evidence.
Why objectivity (95): Highly objective presentation. The headline and body text focus solely on the official clarification. There is no editorializing or biased framing; it simply relays the information from the government office and the background of the Oštro report neutrally.
The Slovenian Government Office for Information Security has clarified that it has not yet tested the cybersecurity tools known as Sphere, provided by the Israeli firm Dream Security. The office stated that any future testing would strictly utilize anonymized data within an isolated environment lacking internet connectivity to ensure national security. This statement follows a report by the portal Oštro revealing a July meeting between Dream Security representatives, including former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, and Prime Minister Janez Janša. Although the initial report suggested an agreement to conduct laboratory tests at the SIGOV-Cert sector, the government office emphasized that the meeting was purely informational and did not constitute a decision to purchase or implement the solution. Officials further noted that they were not involved in organizing the meeting between the Prime Minister and the private company.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a straightforward account of a government clarification regarding a cybersecurity procurement inquiry. It quotes both the government office and the Prime Minister's cabinet directly, providing their specific justifications for data handling and the nature of the meetings. There,
Why factuality (90): The article mirrors the factual content of the other sources precisely. It correctly states that the government office clarified the meeting was presentational/informational and that no testing has occurred. The details regarding the participants and the proposed testing conditions are accurate acco
Why objectivity (95): The writing style is detached and journalistic. It avoids loaded language and presents the situation as a matter of record: the disclosure happened, and here is the official response. No personal opinion or slant is detectable in the text.
The Slovenian government office has confirmed that the Israeli cybersecurity tool known as Sphere has not yet been tested within the country. This clarification follows a report by the outlet Oštro revealing a meeting between representatives of the Israeli firm Dream Security, including former Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz who now co-owns the company, and Prime Minister Janez Janša. The meeting also included Niko Gamulin, the acting director of the Office for Information Security. According to documents obtained by Oštro, the security office agreed to conduct a laboratory trial of the Sphere tool at the SIGOV-Cert sector facility. The government emphasized that any testing would strictly utilize anonymized data in an isolated environment without internet connectivity to ensure national data protection. Officials stated that the purpose of such a trial would be to evaluate the solution's utility and added value, noting that the presentation does not constitute a decision to purchase or implement the system operationally.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a specific administrative and diplomatic interaction involving high-level political figures (the Prime Minister) and foreign lobbying efforts regarding national security infrastructure. While the subject matter involves government procurement and international relations, which
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reflects the cross-source consensus regarding the government office's statement that the 'Sphere' tool has not been tested yet. It correctly identifies the parties involved (Janša, Kurz, Gamulin) and cites the specific conditions mentioned by officials (isolated environment, a
Why objectivity (70): While largely factual, the inclusion of the phrase 'lobističnem stiku' (lobbying contact) introduces a slightly negative connotation compared to the neutral 'meeting' used elsewhere. However, this is presented as a reference to previous reporting rather than an explicit accusation, keeping the overa
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
Slovenia
