ON
← Back to feed
Vitamin C can’t cure colds – how a Nobel Prize winner’s claims were disproved
India🏛️ PoliticsCenter6 days ago

Vitamin C can’t cure colds – how a Nobel Prize winner’s claims were disproved

The article discusses the historical claim that vitamin C can prevent or cure colds, popularized by Nobel Prize-winning scientist Linus Pauling. Pauling, a chemist and peace activist, published a book in 1970 suggesting high doses of vitamin C could prevent colds, based on limited and flawed research. His recommendations influenced widespread vitamin C consumption. However, subsequent scientific reviews have shown that while vitamin C might slightly reduce the duration of severe cold symptoms in specific groups like athletes and military personnel, it does not significantly reduce the risk of catching a cold. A 2023 meta-analysis of 10 placebo-controlled trials involving 2,736 participants found a 15% reduction in severe symptom days, though this was measured by 'days confined indoors' rather than objective clinical outcomes. Another 2013 meta-analysis found no overall reduction in cold incidence but noted minor benefits for specific populations. The article concludes that Pauling's claims are overstated and that current evidence supports only modest effects on symptom severity.

Go to the primary sources (6)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

Scroll.in logoScroll.inIndependentCenter6 days ago
Vitamin C can’t cure colds – how a Nobel Prize winner’s claims were disproved

The article discusses the historical claim that vitamin C can prevent or cure colds, popularized by Nobel Prize-winning scientist Linus Pauling. Pauling, a chemist and peace activist, published a book in 1970 suggesting high doses of vitamin C could prevent colds, based on limited and flawed research. His recommendations influenced widespread vitamin C consumption. However, subsequent scientific reviews have shown that while vitamin C might slightly reduce the duration of severe cold symptoms in specific groups like athletes and military personnel, it does not significantly reduce the risk of catching a cold. A 2023 meta-analysis of 10 placebo-controlled trials involving 2,736 participants found a 15% reduction in severe symptom days, though this was measured by 'days confined indoors' rather than objective clinical outcomes. Another 2013 meta-analysis found no overall reduction in cold incidence but noted minor benefits for specific populations. The article concludes that Pauling's claims are overstated and that current evidence supports only modest effects on symptom severity.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced review of scientific findings regarding vitamin C and colds, discussing both Pauling's historical claims and later refutations. It avoids overtly criticizing or praising either side, focusing instead on presenting the evidence objectively. While it highlights the over

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories