ON
← Back to feed
Violence is inevitable, proletarian expropriation, the squares are a lesson. From Gassman to Raffaele Giuliani, so the radical left chic defend the looting
Italy🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressiveyesterday

Violence is inevitable, proletarian expropriation, the squares are a lesson. From Gassman to Raffaele Giuliani, so the radical left chic defend the looting

Italy is facing a tense situation after widespread protests and violence across several cities, particularly Milan, which caused significant damage to businesses and infrastructure. While the government and local authorities work to address the escalating unrest, some prominent figures from the radical-left wing have attempted to justify or explain the violence. Actor and director Alessandro Gassmann stated that the violence was 'inevitable' due to systemic neglect of marginalized groups, sparking controversy online. Social commentator Raffaele Giuliani described the riots as an example of 'proletarian expropriation,' invoking Marxist ideology. Meanwhile, regional official Giovanni Paglia acknowledged the distress of young people but criticized the immediate appropriation of goods during the protests.

Italian cities, particularly Milan, are grappling with the aftermath of intense protests that erupted over the weekend, leaving widespread damage in their wake. As business owners hesitate to reopen and the government seeks ways to curb the escalating violence, some figures from the left-wing spectrum have attempted to justify or explain the unrest. Among them are actors and public intellectuals such as Alessandro Gassmann, Raffaele Giuliani, and Giovanni Paglia. Gassmann, known for his work in acting and directing, commented on the demonstrations during the presentation of his latest film. He stated that the protests were calling attention to important issues and that it was inevitable for the marginalized to resort to violence. His remarks sparked controversy online, with critics accusing him of defending criminals and those responsible for the destruction of Italian cities. Raffaele Giuliani, a social media influencer popular on platforms like TikTok and a regular guest on Lilli Gruber's show, described the events in Milan and other cities as instances of "proletarian expropriation," drawing parallels to Marxist ideology. His comments have drawn mixed reactions, with some questioning his alignment with historical leftist movements. Giovanni Paglia, an official in Emilia-Romagna, acknowledged the difficulties faced by young people who filled the streets. While he did not endorse the acts of violence, he emphasized the need to understand the challenges these individuals face, including growing up in economically disadvantaged families. His statements reflect a broader attempt within certain political circles to contextualize the unrest amid ongoing societal tensions.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

2 reports

Il Giornale logoIl GiornaleParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 40Objective 30yesterday
Violence is inevitable, proletarian expropriation, the squares are a lesson. From Gassman to Raffaele Giuliani, so the radical left chic defend the looting

Italy is facing a tense situation after widespread protests and violence across several cities, particularly Milan, which caused significant damage to businesses and infrastructure. While the government and local authorities work to address the escalating unrest, some prominent figures from the radical-left wing have attempted to justify or explain the violence. Actor and director Alessandro Gassmann stated that the violence was 'inevitable' due to systemic neglect of marginalized groups, sparking controversy online. Social commentator Raffaele Giuliani described the riots as an example of 'proletarian expropriation,' invoking Marxist ideology. Meanwhile, regional official Giovanni Paglia acknowledged the distress of young people but criticized the immediate appropriation of goods during the protests.

Bias read (Progressive): The article highlights statements by left-wing figures who defend or rationalize the violence using terms like 'proletarian expropriation' and emphasize systemic inequality. The framing focuses on justifying the actions of protesters rather than condemning them, aligning with leftist perspectives on

Why factuality (40): The article discusses events related to protests and public figures commenting on them but does not provide specific factual details about la Repubblica’s ownership, history, or political alignment. The primary source document provides clear historical and ownership facts about la Repubblica, which

Why objectivity (30): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'violenza inevitabile', 'saccheggi', and includes negative social media comments, showing a biased perspective favoring criticism of those defending the protests. This indicates a lack of neutrality and balance.

la Repubblica logola RepubblicaIndependent🔒CenterFactual: no official source document/info detectedObjective 85yesterday
Clashes, from rapper to no vax leader: who is behind Italia in piazza

The article discusses the mobilization of thousands of young people through an Instagram account over thirteen days, which organized protests and incidents in Italy. The movement, referred to as 'Italia in piazza,' has drawn attention due to its rapid growth and the involvement of various figures, including a rapper and a leader of the anti-vaccine movement. The article highlights how online chats became hubs for organizing these activities, suggesting a coordinated effort behind the scenes. However, the content is partially restricted to subscribers, limiting the depth of information available to the general public.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual overview of the mobilization efforts and mentions different groups involved without overtly favoring any side. It does not exhibit clear biased language, one-sided sourcing, or editorializing that would indicate a strong lean toward either left or right.

Why factuality: no official source document/info detected

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the event without overt bias or emotional language. It avoids taking sides and focuses on reporting the mobilization and involvement of various individuals, keeping the narrative objective and factual.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories