The Icelandic political landscape has been stirred recently by statements made by Sigurður Þórðarson, a member of parliament for the People's Party and chairperson of the financial committee. He announced his intention to vote against continuing Iceland’s participation in negotiations regarding membership in the European Union in August. His stance is rooted in concerns about the country’s fishing industry and its potential vulnerability under EU regulations. According to Þórðarson, certain matters related to the fisheries sector need to be addressed domestically before considering Iceland’s accession to the EU. He emphasized that the current system should not be altered without ensuring that the nation’s interests are protected, particularly concerning the export of fish and other seafood products.
Þórðarson warned that if Iceland were to join the EU without changes to its existing framework, foreign companies could potentially acquire control over the country’s marine resources. This would allow international food corporations to purchase the largest fishing companies and transport unprocessed fish abroad for processing. Such a scenario could threaten the entire domestic processing industry. He stressed that Iceland must remain vigilant about its sovereignty and not overestimate its position within the EU. With Iceland being just 0.08% of the population of the EU, he argued that the country should focus on internal reforms rather than seeking special solutions within the union.
According to Þórðarson, specific steps have already been taken in the spring towards increasing the value of exports, but more work remains to be done. He noted that the Tax Authority has not provided him with information about the export value of the country’s main export goods unless there is extensive follow-up. He highlighted the importance of making informed decisions quickly and effectively, suggesting that measures such as significantly increasing local fishing efforts and reforming the system so that fish does not go unprocessed abroad can be implemented swiftly.
In another development, Gunnlaugur Stefánsson, a former member of parliament and pastor in Heydol, wrote about the recent decision by the new Minister of Fisheries to bring forward an old proposal on the management of open sea areas. The proposal had previously been submitted by the former government but was rejected due to lack of support and failure to address environmental concerns. The proposal aimed to adjust quotas for open sea areas, allowing foreigners to fish in these regions using nets with all the associated gear typically used in aquaculture operations involving salmon.
Stefánsson criticized the move, pointing out that this approach disregards the findings of the National Audit Office, which had raised serious concerns about the management of the open sea areas. He expressed disappointment that the new government did not introduce a fresh policy aligned with modern times, emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and environmental protection. Stefánsson also pointed out that unlike the quota system for fishing, which restricts foreign ownership, the proposed changes for open sea areas would allow foreigners to own significant portions of the industry.
He further explained that no country in the world allows such a quota system for open sea areas, arguing that it creates economic value while causing ecological damage. He referenced experiences in Norway and Canada, where open net pen farming has led to severe environmental consequences, including the destruction of wild salmon populations and harm to surrounding ecosystems. Stefánsson urged the government to wake up to the realities of the present time and prepare a new proposal that addresses both the demands for innovation and environmental protection, working collaboratively with all stakeholders.
Stefánsson concluded by stating that the best contribution to the fishing industry in the Westfjords and the community in Djúpavogur, which heavily rely on the open sea areas, is to ensure that the aquaculture industry is modernized and meets contemporary standards. He called for a responsible approach to avoid repeating past mistakes and to safeguard the future of the industry and the environment.
2 reports
VísirIndependentCenter4 days agoThe article discusses concerns raised by Sigurður Þórðarson, a member of the Icelandic parliament and head of the Finance Committee, regarding Iceland's potential accession to the European Economic Area (EEA). He argues that before joining the EEA, Iceland should address internal issues related to fisheries and trade, particularly the impact of foreign companies buying Icelandic fishing quotas and exploiting fish resources. He warns that if Iceland joins the EEA without resolving these issues, foreign firms could purchase major fishing operations and export unprocessed fish abroad, leading to loss of local jobs. Þórðarson suggests that Iceland should focus on domestic reforms rather than seeking special arrangements with the EU, emphasizing that Iceland is only 0.08% of the EU population and does not need to change much. He calls for immediate action to improve transparency and data on exports, arguing that current information is insufficient and delays decision-making.
Bias read (Center): While the issue of Iceland’s potential accession to the EEA is politically significant, the article presents arguments from both sides—highlighting economic risks and advocating for domestic reform—without overtly favoring one position over another. The tone remains balanced, focusing on factual and
VísirIndependentRight5 days ago Do we want to have a quota on marine life?The article discusses a proposal by Iceland's new Minister of Fisheries to reintroduce a bill related to the management of the open sea fishing quota, which had previously been rejected by the old government due to environmental concerns. The proposed legislation aims to allow foreign nationals to fish in Icelandic waters using quotas, similar to those used in fisheries management. This has raised concerns about environmental protection and national interests. The bill was initially criticized by the National Audit Office for its handling of fisheries governance but was still brought forward by the new administration. Critics argue that this approach undermines environmental safeguards and creates economic advantages for foreign entities, while allowing Icelanders limited access to fishing rights.
Bias read (Right): The article frames the reintroduction of the quota system as a controversial move that prioritizes economic interests over environmental protection and national sovereignty. It criticizes the new government for reverting to a previous proposal that was rejected due to environmental concerns, and it
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Become a Supporter
IS
