Vijay puts mobiles on flight mode in Tamil Nadu's temples. Gods know why
In Tamil Nadu, the Vijay government has implemented a ban on using mobile phones inside 52 major temples managed by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. Pilgrims are required to deposit their devices at designated counters, usually for a fee of ₹5, before entering for darshan. This policy aims to prohibit unauthorized photography, videography, and social media content creation within temple premises, which the government claims disrupts the sacred atmosphere and hinders crowd management. The initiative follows a directive from the Madras High Court in December 2022, which called for restricting mobile phone usage in temples to preserve their sanctity. Despite these measures, enforcement remains challenging due to persistent violations, including covert photography and video recordings.
Smartphone use has been restricted within 52 major temples across Tamil Nadu, effective Tuesday, as part of a broader effort to preserve the sacred atmosphere of religious sites. The directive, enforced by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments (HR&CE) Department, mandates that devotees deposit their smartphones at designated counters and pay a fee of ₹5 per device. Mobile phones without cameras are exempted from the rule, allowing them to be used freely within temple premises. This measure follows a directive from the Madras High Court and addresses growing concerns over the misuse of smartphones by visitors, particularly younger devotees, who often capture images, videos, and social media content within temple grounds. The policy was announced by HR&CE Minister S Ramesh, who stated that the restrictions aim to maintain a tranquil environment conducive to worship. According to the department, such activities, such as photographing deities, recording rituals, and creating reels, have disrupted the spiritual ambiance and caused discomfort to other worshippers. The HR&CE Department noted that similar prohibitions had already been in place at certain temples, including those in Palani, Tiruchendur, Madurai, and Rameswaram. However, the recent expansion to 52 temples marks a more widespread implementation of the regulation. The process for depositing smartphones involves visiting counters located at temple entrances, where devotees must present their devices and receive a token or receipt. These tokens serve as proof of ownership and must be presented upon retrieval. At the Devarajaswamy-Athi Varadar Temple in Kanchipuram, additional measures have been introduced, including the registration of each devotee’s photograph, phone model, and number. This ensures accurate verification when retrieving the device. Similar procedures are being adopted at other temples, including the Arunachaleshwarar Temple in Tiruvannamalai. The ₹5 fee charged for each phone deposit has been clarified by the HR&CE Department as non-revenue generating. Instead, the funds are intended to cover operational costs related to managing the deposit system, such as hiring personnel, securing storage facilities, and maintaining security lockers. Despite this explanation, some devotees and temple staff have voiced apprehensions. Temple workers, in particular, have expressed concern over the added burden of handling and safeguarding numerous smartphones, noting that unlike footwear, which can occasionally be misplaced, mobile devices hold significant value and require careful management. Some initial resistance from devotees has been observed, with certain individuals objecting to the restriction. However, temple authorities have emphasized the need for gradual adaptation and have explained the exemptions for non-camera phones. Public notices and multilingual signage have been installed at key locations, including parking areas and temple entrances, to inform visitors of the new rules. Additionally, announcements via public address systems have been made to reinforce the policy. The implementation of the smartphone ban aligns with a December 2, 2022, order from the Madras High Court, which was issued in response to a public interest litigation case. The legal challenge originated from a petition filed by Seetharaman, who sought a ban on smartphone usage at the Arulmigu Subramania Swamy Temple in Tiruchendur. The court’s ruling has prompted the HR&CE Department to issue detailed guidelines, prohibiting the photography and videography of deities and rituals, as well as restricting the capturing of images involving VIPs, public figures, or celebrities. These measures underscore the broader intent to uphold the sanctity and privacy of temple spaces.
3 reports
India TodayIndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 709/2/2026
The Vijay government has implemented a ban on smartphones within 52 major temples in Tamil Nadu, effective Tuesday. Devotees must deposit their devices at designated counters and pay Rs 5 per phone, while mobile phones without cameras are allowed. The measure follows directives from the Madras High Court and aims to curb unauthorized photography and video recording by visitors, which authorities claim disrupts the spiritual environment. The policy includes registration processes for deposited phones and multilingual notices at temple sites. While some devotees support the initiative as preserving temple sanctity, others express concerns about phone security and potential congestion at counters.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the policy as a regulatory measure based on court orders and administrative directives, without overtly endorsing or criticizing the government's stance. It provides balanced reporting on both supportive and critical reactions from devotees, avoiding strong ideological framing.
Why factuality (90): The article clearly states the new smartphone ban in 52 Tamil Nadu temples, including the ₹5 deposit rule and exceptions for non-camera phones. It references the Madras High Court's previous directives and provides details about implementation at a specific temple, aligning with the cross-source con
Why objectivity (70): While the article provides factual information, it includes phrases like 'drawn mixed reactions' which may imply a subjective interpretation of public sentiment. The tone leans slightly towards highlighting the controversy rather than presenting both sides equally.
The Tamil Nadu government, led by Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay, has imposed a smartphone ban in 52 major temples across the state. Devotees are required to deposit their smartphones at designated counters upon entry and pay a ₹5 fee per device. This measure aims to address concerns over the disruption caused by photography, video recording, and selfie-taking within temple premises, which authorities claim affects the spiritual atmosphere and causes inconvenience. The policy aligns with previous directives from the Madras High Court and builds on existing restrictions at some temples. The collected fees are intended to cover operational costs related to managing the phone-deposit system, such as staffing and security infrastructure.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the policy as a government initiative based on official statements and legal precedents, without overtly criticizing or praising the decision. It provides balanced information about the rationale behind the ban, the implementation process, and the financial justification for the
Why factuality (85): The article confirms the smartphone ban in 52 temples, the ₹5 deposit rule, and the exception for non-camera phones. It cites sources such as ANI and the HR&CE Department, aligning with the cross-source consensus. However, it lacks detailed implementation specifics compared to the first article.
Why objectivity (75): The article uses phrasing like 'reportedly banned' and 'said the restriction would be implemented' which suggests reliance on secondary sources. It also mentions political figures and their statements, which can introduce a slight partisan tone.
India TodayIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 709/3/2026
In Tamil Nadu, the Vijay government has implemented a ban on using mobile phones inside 52 major temples managed by the Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department. Pilgrims are required to deposit their devices at designated counters, usually for a fee of ₹5, before entering for darshan. This policy aims to prohibit unauthorized photography, videography, and social media content creation within temple premises, which the government claims disrupts the sacred atmosphere and hinders crowd management. The initiative follows a directive from the Madras High Court in December 2022, which called for restricting mobile phone usage in temples to preserve their sanctity. Despite these measures, enforcement remains challenging due to persistent violations, including covert photography and video recordings.
Bias read (Center): The article presents the policy implementation and its background neutrally, citing court directives and outlining both the government's rationale and the challenges of enforcement. There is no overtly biased language or selective sourcing that would indicate a clear ideological lean.
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the implementation of a mobile phone ban in Tamil Nadu temples under the Vijay government, citing the 2022 Madras High Court directive as the legal basis. It provides specific details such as the number of temples affected, the requirement to deposit devices, and the s
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the policy as having 'judicial parentage' and frames it as a response to concerns about privacy and sanctity, which is reasonable. However, it uses somewhat emotive language such as 'third eye -- not Siva’s, but Samsung’s' and 'the smartphone... behaves like the Creator!' which
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.
India
