N1 SlovenijaIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 8017 hr. agoThe office of President Nataša Pirc Musar stated that they had requested access to video footage of a recent traffic accident involving the president in the Kastelec tunnel on the coastal motorway, but were denied access due to ongoing criminal proceedings. They expressed confusion over how the footage became publicly available before the conclusion of the investigation. The president was not wearing a seatbelt during the crash, which involved her and her friend Viktorija Krivolucka, who was also involved in the incident. Opposition leader Robert Golob criticized the ruling coalition for allegedly suppressing truth and creating misinformation.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the situation by highlighting concerns about transparency and potential suppression of information, aligning with left-leaning critiques of governmental opacity. It emphasizes the lack of access to evidence and questions the motives behind the withholding of information, which is傾
Why factuality (85): This article provides a clear account of the official stance from the president’s office regarding access to the video footage, citing interactions with police and SDT. It aligns with other sources on the procedural reasons for withholding the footage and the status of the ongoing investigation. The
Why objectivity (80): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting the official position without overt bias. It frames the situation as a legitimate question rather than taking sides, keeping the focus on the procedural aspects.
Info360IndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7017 hr. agoA traffic safety expert has stated that it is now clear why the footage of a traffic accident involving President of the Republic Nataša Pirc Musar was allegedly hidden. The expert analyzed the footage released by media a day after the incident, which showed the president’s official car colliding with another official vehicle in a tunnel. The expert claims the misuse of red/blue lights, used to signal a convoy, contributed to the accident. According to the expert, the vehicle using these lights did not provide sufficient warning to other drivers, leading to unsafe conditions. The police concluded their investigation into the circumstances and procedures surrounding the accident, finding certain irregularities and deviations. The expert emphasized that drivers must immediately stop upon seeing red/blue lights, which indicate a convoy being escorted, and that proper signaling protocols were not followed.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident around the actions of high-profile individuals, including the president, and highlights potential negligence in traffic protocol enforcement. While the focus is on technical aspects of traffic rules, the emphasis on the involvement of a national leader introduces a的政治
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar and cites an expert opinion on improper use of red/amber lights. It references police conclusions from the day before, indicating alignment with official statements. While no primary source is available, the information
Why objectivity (70): The article presents the expert's opinion as factual but uses emotionally charged language such as 'skrivali posnetek' (hidden footage) and emphasizes the potential negligence of the convoy. The tone leans toward suggesting fault, though not overtly partisan.
Video released of the car accident of the President of the RepublicOn September 1, 2026, RTV Slovenija published footage of a traffic accident involving Slovenia's President Nataša Pirc Musar, which occurred on July 31, 2026. The incident took place during a convoy trip from Croatia to a charity event in Komenda. The president was traveling in a service vehicle with friends Viktorija Krivolucko and Urška Repovž when their car collided with another vehicle at the front of the convoy. The footage reveals that the president’s vehicle had a larger safety distance than required, but the collision still occurred when the lead vehicle began braking suddenly, forcing the second vehicle to move to the right. Experts have questioned whether the president was wearing her seatbelt, as both she and her friend were injured. The accident has raised concerns about transparency in the information provided to the public and the security risks associated with the president’s close relationship with Krivolucko, who is described as Russian. The investigation into the accident is ongoing.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the accident, including expert commentary and available video evidence, without overtly favoring any particular perspective. It raises questions about transparency and security but does not take a clear stance on these issues. The framing remains mostly
Why factuality (80): The article provides a clear timeline of the incident, including the date, location, and participants. It references the police report and expert analysis, which adds credibility. The information is consistent with other articles and appears to be based on reliable sources such as the police report
Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the facts objectively, it includes commentary from an expert (Andrej Brglez) who offers interpretation of the footage. This introduces a slight subjective element, though it is framed as an expert opinion rather than personal bias.
The official van in which the president was travelling collided with the official vehicle at the head of the convoy (VIDEO)On July 31, 2026, President of Slovenia Nataša Pirc Musar was involved in a traffic accident while traveling from Croatia to Komenda for a charity event. The incident occurred on the Primorska motorway near Kastelec, involving two official vehicles in her convoy. Pirc Musar broke her collarbone, while her companion sustained more severe injuries. She was taken to Izola General Hospital and later released to home care. The accident sparked public questions regarding transparency and the circumstances of the journey. On August 3, the presidential office provided additional clarifications, stating that police were investigating the cause. Recently, footage of the incident was released by the RTV Slovenia show 'Tarča,' revealing that the official vehicle carrying the president collided with another official vehicle in the convoy. Experts noted that the vehicle carrying the protected individual maintained a significant safety distance, suggesting possible negligence in maneuvering.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a traffic accident involving the Slovenian president without overtly criticizing or praising the administration. While the incident involves high-profile individuals, the reporting focuses on the technical aspects of the collision and expert analysis rather
Why factuality (80): This article confirms the date, location, and participants of the accident. It cites the police report and expert analysis, reinforcing the consistency of the narrative across different sources. The information is presented clearly and supports the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, though it includes expert commentary similar to the previous article. The focus is on reporting the facts rather than taking sides, maintaining a generally objective stance.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7018 hr. agoThe office of Slovenia's president was denied access to a video recording related to a traffic accident involving the president and her friend, which has now become publicly available before the investigation into the incident is complete. The office requested the footage immediately after the accident due to internal procedures but was blocked by authorities handling the ongoing investigation. Prosecution officials informed them they would provide the footage after the preliminary investigation concludes. The president admitted she was not wearing a seatbelt during the accident and expressed regret. The incident has sparked speculation, especially regarding her friend Viktorija Krivolucka, who was also involved. Opposition leader Robert Golob criticized the lack of transparency and suggested the ruling coalition might want to avoid revealing the truth to continue spreading misinformation.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both the concerns of the presidential office and the explanation from the prosecution, without overtly favoring either side. It includes quotes from multiple perspectives, including criticism from opposition figures, suggesting balanced reporting.
Why factuality (80): The article repeats the core facts from the previous sources about the denial of access to the video by the president’s office and the subsequent public release. It includes additional context about the lack of interviews with the drivers and mentions external criticism from political figures, which
Why objectivity (70): While the article remains largely factual, it introduces some subjective commentary, such as the mention of political criticism from Robert Golob, which adds an interpretive layer rather than maintaining pure neutrality.
DemokracijaParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 75Objective 7022 hr. agoA video has been released showing a traffic accident involving Slovenian President Nataša Pirc Musar, which occurred on July 31 in the Kastelec tunnel. The footage indicates that the incident was caused by excessive speed and insufficient safety distance between vehicles in her motorcade. The first vehicle in the convoy entered the tunnel at high speed and collided with a slower-moving car, forcing it onto the sidewalk. This led to a subsequent collision with a Mercedes V300 carrying the president and two companions, resulting in minor injuries to the president and more severe injuries to one of her companions, Viktorija Krivolucko. Both drivers underwent alcohol and drug tests, which were negative. The police have forwarded the case to the specialized state prosecution due to suspected negligence in causing the accident. The president later admitted she was not wearing a seatbelt and took responsibility for this oversight. Additional security concerns related to Krivolucko have also emerged.
Bias read (Progressive): The article focuses on a high-profile incident involving the Slovenian president, highlighting potential negligence and security issues. While the content presents factual information, the emphasis on the president’s failure to wear a seatbelt and the implication of security risks associated with a伴
Why factuality (75): This article confirms the date, location, and participants of the accident. It includes details about the police report and expert analysis, supporting the overall narrative. However, it focuses more on the legal implications and potential criminal charges, which might introduce a slightly more crit
Why objectivity (70): The tone leans slightly toward discussing the legal consequences, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt. However, it still presents the facts without overt bias.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 75Objective 70yesterdayA video has been released showing the accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar in the tunnel Kastelec. The footage shows her official van colliding with the lead vehicle in the convoy. The investigation into the accident, handled by the Specialized State Prosecution, is still ongoing. The incident occurred at the end of July and raised questions about the lack of public information, the relationship between the president and her companions, and whether she was wearing a seatbelt at the time. According to a specialist in mobility and safe driving, the collision likely occurred because the first vehicle began braking suddenly, causing the second vehicle to barely move to the right. He noted that drivers of protected individuals are trained to drive faster and maintain shorter safety distances.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an accident involving a high-ranking political figure and includes expert commentary without overtly favoring any side. It does not use biased language or selectively present information to support a particular viewpoint.
Why factuality (75): The article confirms the date, location, and participants of the accident. It includes details about the police report and expert analysis, supporting the cross-source consensus. However, it places more emphasis on the ongoing investigation and legal process, which may affect the perceived balance.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is mostly neutral, but it highlights the ongoing legal proceedings, which could be seen as a slight editorial preference towards the seriousness of the situation.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 75Objective 70yesterdayAn article reports on a traffic accident involving the official vehicle of Slovenian President Nataşa Pirc Musar. The incident occurred on July 31, 2025, in the village of Kastelec, while the president was returning from Croatia with two female friends, Viktorija Krivolucka, a Russian citizen with Slovenian nationality, and Urška Repovš. According to the report, the president’s car, a Mercedes-Benz combi, collided with another official vehicle. The president fractured her femur in the crash and later admitted she had not been wearing a seatbelt, despite police records indicating otherwise. The video footage, released by the Tarča radio station on Facebook, claims to show exclusive security camera recordings from the scene.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a traffic accident involving a high-profile individual without overtly criticizing or praising the president. It includes both the president’s admission and the conflicting police record, showing some balance. There is no clear ideological framing or sl
Why factuality (75): This article confirms the date of the accident (July 31, 2026) and mentions the involvement of the president’s convoy. It also includes quotes from the police report regarding the president not being buckled up, which aligns with other sources. While it does not provide direct access to the primary
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains an objective tone by presenting facts and quoting the police report. However, it slightly emphasizes the controversy around the lack of seatbelt use, which could be seen as a minor editorial tilt.
DomovinaIndependentProgressiveFactual 75Objective 55yesterdayThe article discusses a traffic accident involving Slovenia's President Nataša Pirc Musar, which occurred on July 31 in the Kastelec tunnel. Initially, the official office of the president concealed details about the incident, claiming the public had no right to know who accompanied her. Days later, they revealed that the passengers were Urška Repovš and Viktorija Krivolutskaya. Further investigations uncovered connections between Krivolutskaya and former Slovenian intelligence officer Roman Jeglič, who resides in Russia at the same address. There were also questions about Krivolutskaya’s acquisition of Slovenian citizenship and ties to businesses owned by Musar. The article notes that the police seized the video footage from surveillance cameras due to legal concerns regarding privacy, despite previous instances where DARS had released similar footage. However, journalists from the Tarča program eventually obtained and shared the video showing the president's vehicle, allegedly driven by Sašo Lapuh.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the incident as a potential cover-up by the president's office, highlighting connections between individuals close to the president and figures with questionable backgrounds. It emphasizes the lack of transparency and raises ethical concerns, which aligns with a left-leaning bias.
Why factuality (75): The article reports on the traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar, including details about the involvement of her associates and potential connections to other figures. It references multiple sources like Dnevnik, APA, and Požareport, aligning with cross-source consensus on these poi
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat sensational, emphasizing the controversy and public interest, while also suggesting possible political implications. The article presents information but does not maintain strict neutrality, especially when discussing the legal aspects of DARS withholding footage.
DnevnikIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 70yesterdayAn exclusive video obtained by the TV Slovenia program 'Tarča' shows the collision between the presidential limousine carrying President Nataša Pirc Musar and her friends Viktorija Krivolucko and Urška Repovž, and another official vehicle during a convoy. The incident occurred on July 31, 2026, as the president traveled from Croatia to a charity event in Komendo. Due to incomplete information from the president’s office, the accident sparked numerous questions and speculation, further fueled by the revelation that the president’s companion, Viktorija Krivolucko, was involved.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a politically sensitive incident involving the president without overtly criticizing or praising any side. It reports on the event, the circumstances, and the resulting public reaction, maintaining a balanced tone. There is no clear ideological leaning,
Why factuality (70): The article provides basic details about the accident, including the date and participants, but lacks depth compared to others. It references the police report and expert analysis, but the information is less comprehensive and may not fully align with the cross-source consensus.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral tone, but it seems to emphasize certain aspects of the incident, such as the lack of public awareness, which could be interpreted as a subtle editorial angle.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 65yesterday VIDEO: Video released of the car accident of President Nataša Pirc MusarAn article reports on a traffic accident involving Slovenian President Nataşa Pirc Musar's official vehicle. The incident occurred on July 31 in the Kastelec tunnel as she returned from Croatia, accompanied by her friends Viktorija Krivolucka and Urška Repovš. The video footage, released by the TV station Tarča, shows the official Mercedes-Benz combi colliding with another official vehicle leading the convoy. The president sustained injuries, including a broken rib. There is conflicting information regarding whether she was wearing a seatbelt at the time, she stated she wasn’t, but police records indicate she was. The article highlights the discrepancy between her account and the official report.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about a traffic accident involving a high-profile individual without overtly criticizing or praising the president. It reports on both the president’s statement and the police report, showing a balanced approach. While the event has political significance due
Why factuality (70): This article contains some inconsistencies, particularly regarding the timing of the accident and the identity of the passengers. It also introduces additional context about the political connections of one of the passengers, which may not be directly relevant to the factual account of the accident
Why objectivity (65): The tone becomes more speculative when discussing the political background of one of the passengers, introducing a noticeable editorial bias.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 65yesterdayA traffic accident involving Slovenian President Nataša Pirc Musar occurred in August in the Kastelec tunnel. The incident sparked public debate, particularly due to the involvement of her friend Viktorija Krivolucka, who has ties to former Slovenian intelligence officer Roman Jeglič. Initial reports revealed that Pirc Musar did not wear a seatbelt and broke her leg. Later revelations linked Krivolucka to Jeglič during his time working for Slovenian companies in Russia. Pirc Musar denied knowing Jeglič personally but confirmed multiple visits to Russia with Krivolucka. The Slovenian Security Agency noted no special circumstances in Krivolucka’s background during her naturalization process. Recently, a video of the accident was released showing the presidential vehicle colliding with another official car in the convoy, followed by emergency services arriving.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about the president's personal safety and potential connections to Russian figures, which could imply political implications. However, it does not take a clear ideological stance, instead presenting facts and quotes from various parties involved. The framing remains,
Why factuality (70): The article repeats much of the same information as other sources but adds new context about the passenger's background, which may not be essential to the core facts of the accident. Some details appear to be inferred rather than confirmed by the primary sources.
Why objectivity (65): The tone shifts toward speculation about the passenger's background, which introduces a clear editorial bias and reduces objectivity.
[Video] In public video of a traffic accident the president's convoy went wild in the Kastelec tunnelA video recording of a traffic accident involving President Nataša Pirc Musar was released by Nova24TV after being previously kept confidential. The incident occurred in the tunnel Kastelec on July 31st, where the first escort vehicle entered the tunnel at an inappropriate speed and collided with a slower-moving personal car. This caused the first escort vehicle to swerve onto the left side of the road, leading to a chain reaction that included the president’s Mercedes V300, which carried her along with two close friends and security personnel. The final police escort vehicle managed to avoid collision through skilled maneuvering. Both drivers tested negative for alcohol and drugs, but two individuals were injured: the president suffered a minor injury (broken clavicle), while another passenger, later identified as Russian Viktorija Krivolucko, sustained more severe injuries. Both were taken to the hospital, and material damage was estimated at around €37,000. Due to suspicions of negligence causing the accident under Article 323 of the Criminal Code, documentation was submitted to the Specialized State Prosecutor’s Office. The president later admitted she wasn’t wearing a seatbelt
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of a traffic accident involving a high-profile individual without overtly criticizing or praising the political figure. It focuses on the technical aspects of the accident, legal procedures, and medical outcomes, maintaining neutrality in its framing. While the
![[Video] In public video of a traffic accident the president's convoy went wild in the Kastelec tunnel](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=n1info.si%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2F2026%2F8%2F9%2F1786304042_POR20260720-0V1A8291.width-1200.jpg&w=3840&q=75&output=webp&we)
Slovenia
