ON
← Back to feed
(VIDEO) Šarec reveals how Golobič called the management and "the guys made a deal"
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsCenter10 days ago

(VIDEO) Šarec reveals how Golobič called the management and "the guys made a deal"

The article reports on comments made by European Parliament member Marjan Šarec from the Freedom Movement regarding the coordination between media and leftist politics in Slovenia. Šarec discusses how former Prime Minister Janez Drnovšek benefited from media support during his political career, particularly from outlets like RTV Slovenija, Pop TV, Delo, and Dnevnik. He claims that Drnovšek’s success was largely due to his close collaborator Gregor Golobič, who maintained communication with media outlets to align with Drnovšek’s appearances. Šarec criticizes the current political landscape, suggesting that today’s leftist politicians and mainstream media continue a similar practice of behind-the-scenes coordination, effectively shaping public perception through controlled narratives. The article also mentions Šarec’s assertion that the Liberal Democratic Party of Slovenia (LDS) was uniquely capable of producing competent leaders, which has since collapsed after Drnovšek’s departure.

Marjan Šarec, a European Parliament member from the Freedom Movement party, has openly spoken about alleged coordination between left-leaning politics and mainstream media in Slovenia. During a television interview on the show Brez mask hosted by Ljerka Bizilj on TV3, Šarec claimed that former Prime Minister Janez Drnovšek had received support from key media outlets such as RTV Slovenia, Pop TV, Delo, and Dnevnik during his political career. He further stated that current leader of the Freedom Movement, Gregor Golobič, had allegedly called into the control room of these media organizations to coordinate Drnovšek’s appearances. Šarec described this as a form of informal agreement between media and political actors, suggesting that such practices continue today despite changes in individuals involved. Šarec, who previously led the Left Democratic Party (LDS), commented on how Drnovšek would have fared in today's political landscape. According to Šarec, Drnovšek would likely not have survived more than six months in the current political environment. He attributed Drnovšek’s success largely to Golobič, whom he described as one of the central figures of Slovenia’s transition-era left. Šarec noted that after Drnovšek stepped down from leadership, the LDS quickly disintegrated, implying that the party was heavily dependent on his influence. During the interview, Šarec appeared to inadvertently reveal the close relationship between major media outlets and leftist politics in Slovenia. He suggested that this collaboration had been ongoing since the beginning of the country’s independence. Šarec explained that while Drnovšek was active in politics, he benefited from the backing of influential media platforms. He added that Golobič had effectively managed this relationship by contacting media control rooms to ensure favorable coverage for Drnovšek’s public appearances. Šarec also hinted at personal tensions within the political sphere, possibly stemming from jealousy or other internal conflicts. He expressed skepticism about claims that the Liberal Democracy of Slovenia (LDS) was the only capable party with competent members, stating that the party dissolved immediately after Drnovšek left. This remark suggests a critical view of the LDS’s reliance on its former leader and the potential instability of the party structure. Despite discussing historical figures and defunct parties, Šarec’s comments resonate with contemporary political dynamics. His acknowledgment of a hidden alliance between leftist politics and media highlights a practice that continues to shape public discourse today. While some individuals may change over time, Šarec indicated that the underlying mechanisms remain intact. His remarks, however, appear to have exposed vulnerabilities within the left-wing movement, potentially undermining its credibility among critics. Šarec’s revelations come amid broader discussions about the role of media in shaping political narratives. His statements suggest that media coverage is not always independent but can be influenced by political interests. This raises questions about the objectivity of reporting and the extent to which media organizations align with specific political agendas. Šarec’s critique of past and present political-media relationships underscores the complexity of maintaining journalistic integrity in a politically charged environment.

2 reports

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 6013 days ago
[Video] Marjan Šarec: Pigeon called management and the guys made a deal

Marjan Šarec, a member of the European Parliament and part of the Freedom Movement party, openly discussed during a television interview how media outlets and left-liberal politics in Slovenia have historically had close ties. He mentioned that former Prime Minister Janez Drnovšek, who was associated with the left-wing party led by Gregor Golobič, benefited from media support from outlets like RTV Slovenija, Pop TV, Delo, and Dnevnik. Šarec claimed that Golobič would simply call into the control room and coordinate media coverage of Drnovšek’s appearances, implying a level of coordination between media and political actors. Šarec also suggested that the current political landscape still reflects this dynamic, though he noted that some individuals involved have changed over time.

Bias read (Progressive): The article discusses the alleged coordination between left-wing politics and mainstream media in Slovenia, highlighting historical and ongoing relationships. The framing implies criticism of this relationship but presents it as a known fact within the political sphere, which aligns with left-wing (

Why factuality (85): The article reports on a statement by Marjan Šarec regarding coordination between media and left-liberal politics, referencing past political figures like Janez Drnovšek and Gregor Golobič. While no primary source is available, the content aligns with known public statements from Šarec and historica

Why objectivity (60): The article has a clear political tone, favoring the perspective of left-liberal politics and criticizing the current political climate. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'neodvisnost' (independence) and implies a negative judgment of the present political situation. The framing suggests

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 65Objective 4510 days ago
(VIDEO) Šarec reveals how Golobič called the management and "the guys made a deal"

The article reports on comments made by European Parliament member Marjan Šarec from the Freedom Movement regarding the coordination between media and leftist politics in Slovenia. Šarec discusses how former Prime Minister Janez Drnovšek benefited from media support during his political career, particularly from outlets like RTV Slovenija, Pop TV, Delo, and Dnevnik. He claims that Drnovšek’s success was largely due to his close collaborator Gregor Golobič, who maintained communication with media outlets to align with Drnovšek’s appearances. Šarec criticizes the current political landscape, suggesting that today’s leftist politicians and mainstream media continue a similar practice of behind-the-scenes coordination, effectively shaping public perception through controlled narratives. The article also mentions Šarec’s assertion that the Liberal Democratic Party of Slovenia (LDS) was uniquely capable of producing competent leaders, which has since collapsed after Drnovšek’s departure.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the relationship between media and leftist politics in a critical light, implying collusion and manipulation of public opinion. It portrays leftist politicians and mainstream media as engaged in a covert partnership to control narrative, which aligns with a right-leaning critique.

Why factuality (65): The article reports on statements made by Marjan Šarec regarding coordination between media and left-liberal politics, and mentions his opinion about Janez Drnovšek's potential survival in current political conditions. While these are reported as quotes from Šarec, there is no primary source documen

Why objectivity (45): The article has a clear political tone, presenting Šarec's views as if they are authoritative and critical of the current political landscape. It uses emotionally charged language such as 'potrdil in razkril' (confirmed and revealed) and frames the relationship between media and left-liberal politic

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories