ON
← Back to feed
[Video] Governor with a smile on her face signs abortion until birth
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsProgressiveOverlooked by conservatives12 days ago

[Video] Governor with a smile on her face signs abortion until birth

Democratic Governor of Massachusetts Maura Healey signed a law allowing abortion up until the moment of birth, making Massachusetts the tenth U.S. state without gestational limits on abortion. The law, titled 'Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act,' grants healthcare providers greater discretion to perform late-term abortions without legal repercussions. Previously, abortions after 24 weeks were largely prohibited except in rare cases. Healey emphasized the law protects families facing complications in late pregnancy and ensures access to care within the state rather than requiring women to seek help elsewhere. She framed the law as a shield against potential actions by former President Donald Trump, Republicans, and the Supreme Court following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Pro-life organizations strongly opposed the law, calling it barbaric and warning it would increase late-term abortions where fetuses are dismembered. Critics argue the law expands a practice most Americans do not support, using 'healthcare' as a cover for killing highly developed unborn children.

Governor Maura Healey of Massachusetts signed into law the Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act on August 10, 2026, removing all gestational limits on abortion within the state. The new legislation allows for abortions throughout pregnancy, based on the professional judgment of a physician. The law will take effect 90 days after its signing, according to the governor’s office. This makes Massachusetts the tenth U.S. state with no restrictions on abortion during any stage of pregnancy. The act replaces previous regulations that limited abortions after the 24th week of gestation, except under specific medical exceptions. Under the new law, healthcare providers have broader discretion to decide whether to perform an abortion based on the patient's health condition and individual circumstances. The change has sparked intense debate among advocacy groups, with opponents warning that the removal of gestational limits could lead to an increase in late-term abortions. Healey, a Democrat, emphasized that the law aims to protect families facing complications in later stages of pregnancy and prevent women from seeking care outside the state. She stated that decisions regarding healthcare should be made by women, their families, and their doctors rather than politicians. She pledged to ensure that abortion remains "safe, legal, and accessible" in Massachusetts while she holds office. The law was presented as a shield against potential actions by former President Donald Trump, Republicans in Congress, and the Supreme Court following the overturning of the Roe v. Wade decision. Opponents of the law, including organizations such as SBA Pro-Life America, strongly criticized the measure. Marjorie Dannenfelser, president of SBA Pro-Life America, called the law "monstrous," arguing that it would increase the number of late-term abortions where unborn children are terminated. She described the practice as barbaric, stating that each year tens of thousands of unborn Americans are subjected to procedures that involve dismemberment. Dannenfelser noted that the United States is now among a small group of countries worldwide, including Australia, Canada, China, Guinea-Bissau, Mexico, South Korea, and Vietnam, that allow abortions at any stage of pregnancy. Massachusetts joins Alaska, Colorado, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Vermont, and the District of Columbia in allowing unrestricted abortions. Critics argue that this represents a radical expansion of a practice that the majority of Americans do not support. They claim that the term "healthcare" is used to mask the reality that the procedure involves the termination of highly developed fetuses. Healey characterized her critics as those who "do not stand with women." In response, pro-life activists assert that true protection for both women and children requires legal safeguards for unborn lives right up until birth. They argue that the removal of legal protections for unborn children undermines efforts to defend both maternal and fetal rights. The law marks a significant shift in reproductive policy within Massachusetts, aligning it with other states that have moved toward eliminating gestational limits on abortion. As the law moves forward, its implementation and impact on public health and ethical debates surrounding reproductive rights remain subjects of ongoing discussion and contention.

2 reports

Zanima.me logoZanima.meIndependentProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7012 days ago
New federal state where abortion by Novum is permitted throughout pregnancy

Governor Maura Healey of Massachusetts signed the 'Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act', which allows abortions beyond the 24-week limit during pregnancy, based on a physician's professional judgment. The law removes previous restrictions on late-term abortions and gives healthcare workers broader discretion to make decisions based on a patient's health condition and specific circumstances. The legislation has sparked strong reactions from pro-life organizations, with leaders like Marjorie Dannenfelser calling the change extreme and warning that 'medical' justifications may exist only on paper. The law will take effect 90 days after signing.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the abortion law as a progressive expansion of reproductive rights, emphasizing the removal of restrictions and the empowerment of healthcare providers. It highlights the opposition from conservative groups, but presents their concerns as exaggerated rather than balanced. The tone

Why factuality (85): The article reports that Governor Maura Healey signed the Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act, which removes gestational limits on abortion up to birth. It aligns with the cross-source consensus that this law allows abortions throughout pregnancy based on medical judgment. The article accurately

Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat biased toward supporting the law, using phrases like 'dovoljuje splav otroka vse do trenutka rojstva' and mentions opposition from pro-life organizations. While it presents both sides, the emphasis on Democratic celebration and the framing of the law as a response to Trump’s pol

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 85Objective 7012 days ago
[Video] Governor with a smile on her face signs abortion until birth

Democratic Governor of Massachusetts Maura Healey signed a law allowing abortion up until the moment of birth, making Massachusetts the tenth U.S. state without gestational limits on abortion. The law, titled 'Prioritizing Patient Access to Care Act,' grants healthcare providers greater discretion to perform late-term abortions without legal repercussions. Previously, abortions after 24 weeks were largely prohibited except in rare cases. Healey emphasized the law protects families facing complications in late pregnancy and ensures access to care within the state rather than requiring women to seek help elsewhere. She framed the law as a shield against potential actions by former President Donald Trump, Republicans, and the Supreme Court following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Pro-life organizations strongly opposed the law, calling it barbaric and warning it would increase late-term abortions where fetuses are dismembered. Critics argue the law expands a practice most Americans do not support, using 'healthcare' as a cover for killing highly developed unborn children.

Bias read (Progressive): The article presents the governor's actions in a favorable light, emphasizing her defense of reproductive rights and framing the law as protective of women’s autonomy. It quotes pro-choice rhetoric and highlights opposition from conservative groups without providing balanced perspectives from boths

Why factuality (85): This article confirms the signing of the same law by Governor Healey, stating it allows abortions up to birth and makes Massachusetts the tenth state without gestational limits. It provides similar factual information as the first article, including the name of the law and the shift from previous re

Why objectivity (70): The article has a clear pro-choice bias, especially in the quote from Healey where she frames the law as protection for families and a shield against conservative policies. The term 'barbarska ureditev' used by the pro-life organization adds emotional weight, though the article itself remains relati

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories