JNU professor Zoya Hasan, a respected academic known for her work on pluralism and secularism, was prevented from delivering a planned Independence Day address at Delhi’s Sardar Patel Vidyalaya on Friday. The event, which was meant to feature Hasan as the chief guest, was abruptly cancelled after a protest organized by members of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) outside the school. In response, Hasan gave a virtual speech to approximately 150 students and parents on Saturday, addressing the importance of pluralism in modern Indian society. Parents apologised for the disruption, blaming external pressures on the school’s decision to withdraw Hasan from the event. The incident unfolded on Friday, when security personnel from the school visited Hasan’s residence shortly before she was set to arrive at the school. According to Hasan, she had been invited by the school principal a month in advance to deliver a speech titled “Why Pluralism Matters.” The event was scheduled to begin at 10 a.m., during which she was to hoist the national flag, address students and parents, and present awards to meritorious students. However, just before her arrival, two men claiming to be school security officials informed her that the event had been cancelled, citing a perceived threat to her safety and that of the students. Hasan expressed surprise at the sudden change, noting that the school had arranged a pickup for her and that the cancellation appeared to be a last-minute decision. Parents associated with the school reported that the cancellation was unexpected and that they were initially unaware of the reason behind it. They claimed that a small group of individuals, identified as members of the VHP, had gathered outside the school gate to protest Hasan’s participation. These protesters, according to the parents, were opposed to the inclusion of a figure they viewed as controversial. While the VHP denied involvement in the protest, it later issued a statement welcoming the cancellation, arguing that the event should not have taken place given Hasan’s past remarks. The school’s managing body, the Gujarat Education Society, took over the event and proceeded with the ceremony, with the school’s president stepping in to replace Hasan and presenting awards to students. Following the cancellation, a group of students and parents organized a virtual meeting on Saturday, allowing Hasan to address them remotely. During the session, Hasan discussed the challenges facing pluralism in contemporary India, highlighting how the concept of nationalism has evolved since the colonial era. She noted that while nationalism once represented resistance to foreign rule, it now often promotes a singular religious identity and demands conformity. Hasan emphasized the importance of maintaining a pluralistic society, drawing upon historical examples and contemporary socio-political developments to illustrate her points. Her speech included reflections on the history of secularism in India and the complex relationship between the state and society. The incident sparked a range of responses from different groups. The Delhi Police clarified that they had not pressured the school to cancel the event and had merely responded to reports of a potential law-and-order issue. Meanwhile, prominent intellectuals and activists expressed concern over the suppression of free expression. Economist Jayati Ghosh criticized the government for its apparent fear of dissent, questioning whether the authorities felt threatened by a lecture on pluralism delivered to young students. Cultural organizations, including the Safdar Hashmi Memorial Trust, also condemned the cancellation, calling it an attack on intellectual freedom. The VHP, meanwhile, defended its stance, asserting that the school had acted responsibly in removing a speaker deemed inappropriate for its audience. As the controversy continues, the school’s principal, Anuradha Joshi, has yet to make a public statement regarding the incident. The broader implications of the event remain unclear, though it has reignited discussions about the balance between free speech and societal norms in educational settings. For now, the focus remains on the ongoing dialogue between educators, activists, and policymakers about the future of pluralism in India.
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.
Become a Supporter
India
