ON
← Back to feed
Constitutional Court rejects AfD lawsuit: Corona rules in the Bundestag were legal
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

Constitutional Court rejects AfD lawsuit: Corona rules in the Bundestag were legal

In 2022, members of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) parliamentary group challenged coronavirus restrictions imposed in the German parliament (Bundestag), specifically the 2G-plus rule requiring vaccination, recovery from COVID-19, and additional testing or booster shots for participation in sessions. The Federal Constitutional Court rejected their lawsuit, ruling that these measures were justified to ensure the functionality of the Bundestag during the pandemic. Under the 2G-plus regulation, unvaccinated MPs could only attend plenary sessions from designated areas on the gallery if they provided a negative test result. The court emphasized that the restrictions did not violate constitutional rights and were proportionate. The AfD filed an organ lawsuit in Karlsruhe, but the court dismissed it, noting that only one MP was affected by the rule and that his rights were still upheld.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

1 reports

taz – die tageszeitung logotaz – die tageszeitungIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
Constitutional Court rejects AfD lawsuit: Corona rules in the Bundestag were legal

In 2022, members of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) parliamentary group challenged coronavirus restrictions imposed in the German parliament (Bundestag), specifically the 2G-plus rule requiring vaccination, recovery from COVID-19, and additional testing or booster shots for participation in sessions. The Federal Constitutional Court rejected their lawsuit, ruling that these measures were justified to ensure the functionality of the Bundestag during the pandemic. Under the 2G-plus regulation, unvaccinated MPs could only attend plenary sessions from designated areas on the gallery if they provided a negative test result. The court emphasized that the restrictions did not violate constitutional rights and were proportionate. The AfD filed an organ lawsuit in Karlsruhe, but the court dismissed it, noting that only one MP was affected by the rule and that his rights were still upheld.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the court's decision neutrally, citing legal arguments from both sides without overtly favoring the AfD or the government. It focuses on the legal reasoning of the court and does not include biased language or selective sourcing.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories