The SHARE Foundation reported that at least 14 individuals from Serbia’s civil society were targeted by advanced spyware ahead of local elections in March. The malware was detected in August after Apple notified users in 110 countries they had likely been victims of commercial surveillance software. This marks the largest documented wave of such attacks in Serbia, according to the foundation. Among those affected were members of student movements, activists, opposition parliamentarians, and a local councilor. At least one device was targeted by Pegasus, spyware developed by the Israeli company NSO Group, while two others were hit by malicious software similar to NewSpy, first identified in Serbia by Amnesty International in December 2024. Reuters could not determine who was responsible for the alleged attacks. NSO Group stated it sells its products exclusively to governments and has not yet responded to requests for comment. The attacks coincided with local elections held on March 29 in ten municipalities, which were seen as a test for opposition groups supported by students. The organization warns that digital attacks could signal similar activities ahead of parliamentary polls in
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the use of spyware targeting Serbian civil society figures ahead of elections, without overtly endorsing any political stance. It reports on the findings of the SHARE Foundation, mentions the involvement of international organizations like Amnesty andNS
Why factuality (85): The article reports on a documented cybersecurity incident involving at least 14 individuals from civil society in Serbia targeted by advanced surveillance software ahead of local elections. It cites the SHARE Foundation as a primary source and aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the sc
Why objectivity (75): The article presents the facts in a neutral tone but includes some emotionally charged language such as 'na meti špijunskog softvera' (targeted by spyware) and emphasizes the implications for political activists and students. While not overtly biased, the focus on the threat posed by surveillance te





