Zakon o odvzemu volilne pravice tujcem, ki je bil sprejet v državni zboru 15. junija 2026, je vzbudil ogroman interes in nasprotje med različnimi skupinami v Sloveniji. Pobudniki referenduma, ki so vključevali kulturna društva, kot so Kulturno društvo Gmajna, Kulturni center Danilo Kiš in Albansko kulturno društvo – AKD Liria, so vložili 5295 podpisov za začetek referendumskih postopkov. To je bilo dovolj za začetek, vendar še ni dosegli cilja za razpis referenduma, ki je 40.000 podpisov. Optimistični so, da bodo v naslednjih 35 dneh dosegli to številko, kar bi pomenilo, da bo referendum možen.
Pobudniki so poudarili, da branijo pridobljene človekove pravice in da se odločili za zaščito slovenske demokracije. Svetlana Slapšak, prvopodpisana pod pobudo, je poudarila, da je to neprimerno, da se odvzema volilna pravica tujcem, ki so že več let delali, plačevali davke in sodelovali v lokalnem okolju. Jure Gombač, drugopodpisani, je dodal, da so tujci del tega, kar je Slovenija. Elvis Alukić iz bošnjaške kulturne zveze Slovenije je ocenil, da bi država energijo in denar morala usmerjati drugam, kot so zdravstvo, šolstvo in gospodarstvo, namesto da bi se borila proti ljudem, ki delajo v zdravstvu in gradbeni panogi.
Spremembe so predlagali v SDS, trojčku NSi, SLS in Fokus ter v Resnici, poleg njih pa so zanje glasovali tudi Demokrati. Proti so glasovali v Gibanju Svoboda, SD in Levici ter Vesni. Podpis pod pobudo za začetek postopka za referendum je minuli teden oddal tudi prvak Svobode Robert Golob. Novela zakona odvzema volilno pravico državljanom tretjih držav, ki imajo dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje in prijavljeno stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji.
Nasprotuje več nevladnih organizacij, ki združujejo in zastopajo tujce v Sloveniji. V izjavi za javnost minuli teden so poudarili, da spremembe omejujejo politične pravice skupine prebivalcev, ki so jih pridobili pred 24 leti. Kot so navedli, gre za "osebe, ki v Sloveniji že vrsto let delajo, plačujejo davke, vzgajajo otroke, soustvarjajo lokalne skupnosti in predstavljajo njihov nepogrešljiv del". Pod izjavo se je podpisalo več kot 20 nevladnih organizacij. Da so spremembe sporne z vidika skladnosti s predmetom in namenom konvencije Sveta Evrope o udeležbi tujcev v javnem življenju na lokalni ravni, so opozorili tudi pri Varuhu človekovih pravic.
Na družbenih omrežjih so se pojavili izrazi nasprotovanja, kjer so nekateri opozarjali na rasizem in ponižanje tujcev. Flurina Ametaj, ki je poudarila, da njena mama po 34 letih ni državljanka, je bila zasledita z naslednjim komentarjem: "Po 34 letih njena mati ni državljanka. Več kot očitno to ne želi biti. Torej, če po toliko letih noče postati državljanka Republike Slovenije, tudi voliti ni njena pravica." Minister za izobraževanje, znanost in mladino dr. Borut Rončević je izpostavil, da njegove soproge, ki je iz tretje države, volilna pravica v Sloveniji sploh ne zanima. Publicist dr. Andrej Drapal je opozoril, da je volilna pravica vezana na državljanstvo in da je to običajna ureditev po celem svetu.
Pobudniki želijo naknadni zakonodajni referendum z referendumskim vprašanjem: "Ali ste za to, da se uveljavi zakon o spremembah in dopolnitvah zakona o lokalnih volitvah, ki ga je državni zbor sprejel na seji dne 15. 6. 2026?" Pobudniki so poudarili, da gre za ljudi, ki v Sloveniji živijo, delajo, plačujejo davke in že desetletja sooblikujejo lokalne skupnosti.
Spremembe so predlagali v SDS, trojčku NSi, SLS in Fokus ter v Resnici, poleg njih pa so zanje glasovali tudi Demokrati. Proti so glasovali v Gibanju Svoboda, SD ter Levici in Vesni. Podpis pod pobudo za začetek postopka za referendum je minuli teden oddal tudi prvak Svobode Robert Golob. Novela zakona odvzema volilno pravico državljanom tretjih držav, ki imajo dovoljenje za stalno prebivanje in prijavljeno stalno prebivališče v Sloveniji.
Nasprotuje več nevladnih organizacij, ki združujejo in zastopajo tujce v Sloveniji. V izjavi za javnost minuli teden so poudarili, da spremembe omejujejo politične pravice skupine prebivalcev, ki so jih pridobili pred 24 leti. Kot so navedli, gre za "osebe, ki v Sloveniji že vrsto let delajo, plačujejo davke, vzgajajo otroke, soustvarjajo lokalne skupnosti in predstavljajo njihov nepogrešljiv del". Pod izjavo se je podpisalo več kot 20 nevladnih organizacij. Da so spremembe sporne z vidika skladnosti s predmetom in namenom konvencije Sveta Evrope o udeležbi tujcev v javnem življenju na lokalni ravni, so opozorili tudi pri Varuhu človekovih pravic.
Pobudniki so poudarili, da branijo pridobljene človekove pravice in da se odločili za zaščito slovenske demokracije. Svetlana Slapšak, prvopodpisana pod pobudo, je poudarila, da je to neprimerno, da se odvzema volilna pravica tujcem, ki so že več let delali, plačevali davke in sodelovali v lokalnem okolju. Jure Gombač, drugopodpisani, je dodal, da so tujci del tega, kar je Slovenija. Elvis Alukić iz bošnjaške kulturne zveze Slovenije je ocenil, da bi država energijo in denar morala usmerjati drugam, kot so zdravstvo, šolstvo in gospodarstvo, namesto da bi se borila proti ljudem, ki delajo v zdravstvu in gradbeni panogi.
Spremembe so predlagali v SDS, trojčku NSi, SLS in
17 reports
N1 SlovenijaIndependentLeftFactual 95Objective 9011 days agoThe initiators of a referendum on changes to the law on local elections, which would revoke the voting rights of citizens of other countries at local elections, have submitted 5295 signatures to the National Assembly today. They needed at least 2500 signatures to initiate the process, and 40,000 signatures to proceed with the referendum. The organizers, including cultural associations such as 'Kulturno društvo Gmajna' and 'Albansko kulturno društvo - AKD Liria,' argue that the proposed law undermines human rights and democracy. They emphasize their goal is to protect Slovenia’s democratic values and oppose the erosion of civil liberties. The organizers believe they will face no difficulties in collecting the remaining 40,000 signatures required for the referendum. The proposed referendum question asks whether voters support the implementation of the law on amendments to the Local Elections Act passed by the National Assembly on June 15, 2026. The law would strip voting rights from foreign nationals with permanent residence permits in Slovenia. The proposal was supported by parties like SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resnica, while opposed by Gibanju Svoboda, SD, and Levica in Vesni.
Bias read (Left): The article frames the proposed law as an attack on human rights and democracy, using strong language to criticize the government and emphasize the protection of democratic values. It highlights the opposition from leftist parties and emphasizes the concerns raised by the organizers regarding the er
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 90): Factual accuracy is excellent with official statements and clear reporting. Objectivity is very high as it presents international relations without bias or emotional language.
Radio OgnjiščeParty-alignedCenterFactual 90Objective 8510 days agoSeveral cultural associations representing foreigners in Slovenia have initiated a referendum process by submitting nearly 6,000 signatures to the National Assembly, aiming to challenge recent amendments to the Local Elections Act that revoke voting rights for non-citizens at the local level. The groups argue these changes violate human rights and threaten democratic values, emphasizing that many of those affected are long-term residents who contribute to society through work and taxes. They claim the law disproportionately targets individuals who have been integrating into Slovenian communities for years. On the other hand, the Slovenian Democratic Party (SDS), which proposed the amendment, argues that voting rights should be strictly tied to citizenship, asserting that citizens bear responsibilities toward their country and local communities. SDS members view the referendum as an opportunity to inform the public about the current practice allowing non-citizens to vote locally. Meanwhile, the Left and Social Democrats are considering challenging the law through constitutional review if the amendments take effect ahead of autumn local elections.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives—those opposing the law on grounds of human rights and democracy, and those supporting it based on citizenship and responsibility arguments—without overtly favoring one side. It includes direct quotes from both proponents and opponents, providing balanced views.
Why these scores (Factual 90 · Objective 85): The article accurately reports on Resnica's decision not to join the partnership, quoting Zoran Stevanović directly. It maintains an objective tone, presenting the decision and its reasoning without overt bias or emotional language.
ReporterIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7511 days agoA group of cultural organizations has launched a petition calling for another referendum on proposed changes to Slovenia's local elections law. The proposed amendment would revoke the voting rights of citizens from third countries who have a permanent residence permit and registered residence in Slovenia. The initiative was signed by Svetlana Slapšak and Jure Gombač, with more information expected to be provided when the petition is submitted to parliament. The proposed law was supported by parties such as SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resnica, as well as Democrats, while opposition came from Gibanju Svoboda, SD, and Levica in Vesni. Over 20 non-governmental organizations representing foreigners in Slovenia oppose the changes, arguing they limit political rights of individuals who have lived in Slovenia for many years and contribute to society. Human rights watchdogs have also raised concerns about the compatibility of the changes with the Council of Europe Convention on the participation of foreigners in public life at the local level.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate, including support from various political parties and opposition from NGOs and human rights groups. It does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language, one-sided sourcing, or omission of context. The framing remains balanced, providing equal weight.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 75): High factuality as it accurately describes the legislative proposal and opposition. Objectivity is strong as it presents both sides of the debate without overt bias.
Žurnal24IndependentRightFactual 85Objective 7018 days agoThe article discusses proposed amendments to Slovenia's local elections law by MPs from SDS, NSi, Resnica, and other parties, which would revoke the voting rights of non-citizens with permanent residence in Slovenia at local elections. The changes would affect around 100,000 residents. Proponents argue that voting rights at the local level should be tied to citizenship, citing practices in most European countries where non-citizens do not have such rights. Opponents, including the opposition and legal advisors, warn that the law could be unconstitutional and represent an unsafe precedent for限制
Bias read (Right): The article frames the proposal as a legitimate policy choice aligned with European norms, emphasizing the proponents' arguments without adequately representing counterarguments or providing balanced context. It highlights the support from right-leaning parties and omits detailed reasoning against,
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 70): Article provides detailed legislative changes and mentions support from various parties. It maintains factual accuracy but shows slight bias by highlighting opposition concerns without equal weight given to supporters’ arguments.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 85Objective 5515 days agoThe article discusses public reactions to changes in Slovenia's local elections law, which restricts participation for citizens from third countries. Left-wing organizations and migrant groups have strongly opposed the law, arguing it revokes voting rights after long-term residency. At a press conference following the law's adoption, representatives from NGOs and migrant organizations expressed concerns, citing cases like that of Flurina Ametaj, whose mother has lived in Slovenia for 34 years but is not a citizen. Social media users also commented, with some suggesting the law creates a form '
Bias read (Center): The article presents opposing viewpoints without overtly favoring one side. It includes quotes from critics of the law and social media responses, providing a balanced view of the debate.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 55): This article focuses on public reactions to a law change affecting non-citizens, presenting quotes from social media and activists. While factual about the law, it shows clear ideological leaning towards right-wing perspectives, especially through the use of emotionally charged language like 'burnin
24ur (POP TV)IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 5518 days agoThe article discusses the debate around the withdrawal of voting rights for foreigners under new electoral reforms in Slovenia. Andrej Kosi from the SDS party explains that the delay was due to the implementation of electoral units within local communities and city districts, which previously limited smaller villages from electing their representatives. The changes also include restricting voting rights for foreign citizens and EU nationals. Sandra Gazinkovski from the Freedom Movement disputes this, arguing that the rushed process suggests urgency in limiting foreign voters' rights, which had
Bias read (Center): The article presents both perspectives without overtly favoring one side, providing direct quotes from opposing viewpoints without editorializing or biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 85 · Objective 55): This article clearly states the law change and its implications, but it frames the issue in a way that suggests a right-wing narrative. It uses emotive language and highlights opposition without providing balanced coverage of different viewpoints.
Maribor24IndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 7518 days agoThe National Assembly has passed amendments to the law on local elections, which will revoke the voting rights of approximately 103,874 foreign citizens residing in Slovenia. The changes are expected to have the most significant impact in larger municipalities such as Ljubljana, Maribor, Celje, Koper, and Kranj. In Maribor, around 9,000 foreigners will lose their voting rights. The Ministry of Internal Affairs noted that these figures are subject to daily change. The amendment also allows municipalities to create multiple electoral units for local, village, and neighborhood communities. Propon
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information without overtly biased language or emphasis. It reports on legislative changes and their potential impacts neutrally, citing official sources and presenting both supporting and opposing viewpoints.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 75): Article discusses the human rights organization’s criticism of the law. It presents the issue objectively but includes commentary that may lean toward supporting the critics’ viewpoint.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 80Objective 7010 days ago The face of the Left's referendum campaign has proven to be unreliableElvis Alukić, president of the Bosnian Cultural Association of Slovenia, has become an outspoken figure in the Left's campaign against proposed changes to the Local Elections Act, which would limit voting rights for foreigners at local elections. In his speeches, he expresses gratitude toward Slovenia while opposing the proposal, often citing his father, who would lose voting rights under the new law. However, inconsistencies have emerged regarding his claims about his father’s residency in Slovenia. Previously, Alukić stated that his family fled to Slovenia during the war in Bosnia, implying they arrived around 34 years ago. Now he claims his father has lived in Slovenia for 57 years and worked there for 40. This discrepancy has been highlighted by critics questioning whether these claims are accurate or fabricated. According to the Citizenship Act of Slovenia, naturalization requires at least 10 years of residence (with the last five continuous), legal status, knowledge of the Slovenian language, financial stability, tax compliance, and no serious criminal record. Alukić himself holds Slovenian citizenship, suggesting he fulfilled the necessary requirements.
Bias read (Right): The article frames Elvis Alukić's claims with skepticism, highlighting contradictions in his statements and questioning their credibility. The tone implies that his arguments lack consistency and may be misleading, aligning with a critical perspective towards his position. The focus on potential mis
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 70): The article accurately reports on Resnica’s rejection of a coalition proposal but presents it through a political lens. It maintains a reasonable level of neutrality despite the political context.
Slovenske noviceIndependentRightFactual 80Objective 6010 days agoThe debate over the voting rights of foreigners in local elections continues to divide Slovenian society. After the Left Party supported a referendum initiative against removing voting rights from citizens of third countries with permanent residence in Slovenia, a lively discussion followed. The Left emphasized the difference between EU citizens and those from other countries, arguing it is illogical that people from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, and other former Yugoslav states—who have lived in Slovenia for decades—lose their voting rights while EU citizens retain them. Poslanka Nataša Sukič highlighted that non-EU citizens had stricter residency requirements to gain voting rights, suggesting they are integrated into Slovenian society. She criticized the timing of legal changes, which often occur just before local elections. Goran Šarac, husband of singer Simone Weiss, responded by comparing Slovenia to his home country on the Balkans, stating that while he respects Slovenians' hospitality, he believes foreigners shouldn't expect the same rights as locals. He argued that the proposed law aligns with this principle and that Slovenians don’t need him to advocate for something he,
Bias read (Right): The article frames the issue through the perspective of a right-leaning commentator, Goran Šarac, who argues against granting voting rights to non-citizens, using metaphors that imply a hierarchy of belonging. The framing emphasizes cultural integration and national identity as prerequisites for enm
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): This article reports on a referendum initiative regarding voting rights for foreigners, including quotes from cultural organizations and responses from SDS. It provides factual information but has a somewhat biased tone when discussing the motivations behind the referendum, implying it's driven by '
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 6014 days agoIn Slovenia, organizers are collecting signatures to initiate a referendum process regarding changes to the law on local elections, which would revoke the voting rights of citizens from other countries who have permanent residency and registered residence in Slovenia. The deadline for collecting 2500 signatures is June 22. The proposed amendments were passed by the National Assembly on June 15 and were supported by several parties including SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resni.ca, while opposition came from Gibanju Svoboda, SD, and Leva in Vesna. Former Prime Minister Robert Golob has signed the initiative. Multiple non-governmental organizations representing foreigners in Slovenia oppose the changes, arguing they limit political rights of individuals who have lived and contributed to local communities for years. Human rights ombudsman Simona Drenik Bavdek criticized the rapid legislative changes without expert input or public debate.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the issue, including the supporters of the legal changes and the opposition from NGOs and the human rights ombudsman. It provides balanced information without overtly favoring one side through language or emphasis.
Why these scores (Factual 80 · Objective 60): The article explains the rationale behind the law changes from an SDS perspective, including the shortened process. It provides context about the law but shows some bias by emphasizing the right-wing viewpoint while downplaying opposition concerns.
DemokracijaParty-alignedLeftFactual 75Objective 6517 days agoThe article discusses a new law passed by the National Assembly that removes the voting rights of foreigners and citizens of third countries in local elections, including municipal and district councils, as well as mayoral elections. The law aims to prevent abuses such as fake registrations of temporary residences in Ljubljana before local elections, where groups of people would register at addresses in the city and then deregister after the election. This practice allowed them to influence the election results. The article references Vili Kovačič, who has previously highlighted these issues,
Bias read (Left): The article presents the removal of voting rights for foreigners as a response to alleged abuse, which frames the issue as a necessary measure against fraud. It highlights concerns raised by Vili Kovačič, a figure associated with left-wing politics, and emphasizes the potential impact on election公平性
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 65): Reports on SD rejecting Janša’s coalition offer, but doesn’t tie into the primary source. The tone is critical of Janša’s government, showing a partisan lean without full neutrality.
The Slovenia TimesIndependentRightFactual 75Objective 6518 days agoSlovenia's parliament has passed amendments to strip third-country nationals of their voting rights in local elections, despite opposition from NGOs, the human rights ombudsman, and the Council of Europe. The law, which was passed by a 47:32 vote, will take effect unless blocked by the Constitutional Court. Third-country nationals with permanent residency were previously allowed to vote in mayoral and municipal council elections but could not run as candidates. According to official data, approximately 103,900 third-country nationals would be eligible to vote in the upcoming elections, though
Bias read (Right): The article frames the policy change as a response to unspecified 'concerns' without providing balanced perspectives from supporters of the amendment. It emphasizes opposition from NGOs, the ombudsman, and international bodies while downplaying the rationale given by the proponents. The tone implies
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 65): Article focuses on legal changes affecting voting rights for third-country nationals, with limited reference to the broader political context. Factuality is moderate, but objectivity is lower due to emphasis on political motivations and lack of balance in presenting opposing views.
Nova24TVParty-alignedCenterFactual 75Objective 6018 days ago Slovenes living in other countries cannot vote in local electionsThe article discusses proposed changes to Slovenia's local elections law that would restrict voting rights on local elections to citizens of the European Union. It notes that Slovenian citizens living abroad cannot vote in local elections due to citizenship requirements, and questions why the left would allow non-citizens in Slovenia to retain this privilege. The article mentions that the current proposal aligns with EU norms and highlights that Slovenia has been an exception by allowing non-EU citizens to vote locally. The left opposes the change, arguing it could affect the number of votes a
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of the proposed legal changes without overtly favoring any side. It includes perspectives from both supporters and opponents of the bill but does not adopt a clear ideological stance or use biased language.
Why these scores (Factual 75 · Objective 60): Closely mirrors content from article #1 but repeats similar points without adding new information. Maintains some objectivity but still lacks depth on financial transparency issues mentioned in the primary source.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6514 days ago Started collecting signatures for the referendum on the voting rights of foreigners: Golob also gave his signatureActivists have begun collecting signatures for a referendum on a proposed law that would remove the voting rights of non-citizens in local elections in Slovenia. The initiative was launched by cultural organizations and supported by several political parties, including SDS, NSi, SLS, Fokus, and Resnica, while opposition came from Gibanju Svoboda, SD, and Levica in Vesni. Over 20 NGOs representing immigrants in Slovenia opposed the changes, arguing they undermine the political rights of individuals who have lived and contributed to society for years. Human rights ombudsman Simona Drenik Bavdek criticized the proposed amendments as problematic regarding compliance with the Council of Europe Convention on the participation of foreigners in public life at the local level.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both supporters and opponents of the proposed law, quoting multiple political groups and NGOs. It does not favor one side over the other but provides balanced perspectives on the issue.
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 65): Factuality is lower as it focuses on a single politician's actions without broader context. Objectivity is compromised by highlighting one individual's actions while ignoring wider political dynamics.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 6011 days ago Local elections and foreigners: If they fail with the referendum, the constitutional judgment is already writtenA referendum initiative has been submitted to the National Assembly (DZ) seeking to repeal a proposed amendment to Slovenia’s Local Elections Act, which would remove voting rights for foreign citizens with permanent residency. The initiative, supported by parties like SDS, NSi, Demokrati in Resnica, and backed by cultural organizations, requires 40,000 signatures to proceed. Opposing groups, including SD, Gibanje Svoboda, Levica, and Vesna, argue the amendment violates constitutional principles and human rights protections, citing concerns over equality before the law and the lack of justification for removing voting rights. SD claims the referendum prevents the possibility of a constitutional review of the proposed law, which they believe could have been initiated if the law had already taken effect.
Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the debate—supporters of the referendum and opponents who argue for a constitutional review—without overtly favoring one perspective. It includes quotes from multiple political entities and highlights legal and ethical concerns raised by SD, while also noting the 5
Why these scores (Factual 70 · Objective 60): Discusses constitutional court possibilities regarding voter rights, but lacks direct link to the primary source. The tone is speculative and leans toward a particular political viewpoint.
Nova24TVParty-alignedRightFactual 60Objective 5521 days ago The governments are deceiving that the deprivation of voting rights to foreigners is unconstitutional, the Constitution says otherwise.A group of left-wing NGOs, part of the Legal Network for Democracy Protection, has been spreading misinformation through mainstream media, claiming that proposed changes to the law on local elections are unconstitutional. The bill was introduced by a coalition of MPs from SDS, Resni.ce, NSi, Focus, and SLS, supported by a majority in the parliamentary committee on internal affairs and public administration. The left opposition, led by Freedom and Levica, opposes the bill. Critics argue that the new law would revoke active voting rights for foreigners at local elections. Some officials have mis
Bias read (Right): The article frames the legal network and left-wing NGOs as spreading 'misinformation' and criticizes their claims as 'false.' It highlights the opposition from left-wing parties while portraying them as promoting policies that prioritize foreign interests over domestic ones. The tone implies that a右
Why these scores (Factual 60 · Objective 55): Low factuality due to hyperbolic comparisons to historical figures and conspiracy-like rhetoric. Objectivity is poor as it uses emotionally charged language and lacks neutrality in its portrayal of political tensions.
Zanima.meIndependentCenter18 days agoThe article discusses the debate over whether foreign citizens should continue to have the right to vote in Slovenia. It mentions that the current coalition government is considering removing this voting right, while left-wing parties are opposing such a move and fighting to keep it.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual summary of the ongoing political discussion without taking a stance or using biased language. It does not favor one side over the other and simply reports on the positions of different political groups.
Slovenia
