In Skopje, a destructive wind and 15 injured, in Hvar and Vis, a meteor shower
A severe storm struck Skopje, North Macedonia, on Tuesday afternoon, causing strong winds that damaged roofs, trees, traffic lights, and power lines. Heavy rain led to flooding in homes, with 15 people requiring medical attention, including head injuries and broken bones. The local general hospital and elementary school were among the affected buildings. Emergency services received over 8,300 calls between 17:00 and 21:00. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, heavy rains flooded streets in Sarajevo, while lightning struck approximately 30 sheep near Kupres. Storms also caused meteorological tsunamis on the Adriatic islands of Hvar and Vis, where sea levels rose significantly before receding by about half a meter. These tsunamis are caused by rapid changes in air pressure, which trigger fluctuations in sea level. Similar phenomena were reported earlier this week on the island of Lošinj. Weather forecasts indicate calmer conditions over the Adriatic today, but a yellow warning remains in effect for Croatia’s coast due to strong winds with gale-force gusts.
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
A severe storm struck Skopje on Tuesday, causing significant damage and injuring 15 people. The storm, characterized by strong winds and heavy rainfall, led to roof damage, tree felling, and flooding in residential areas. Emergency services received over 8,300 calls within four hours. The impact was felt beyond Macedonia, with floods reported in Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and coastal areas of Hvar and Vis in Croatia, where sea level fluctuations caused beach flooding. Meteorological phenomena such as meteocunamis were observed, driven by rapid atmospheric pressure changes.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on natural disaster impacts across multiple regions without overt ideological framing. While it mentions political entities like the 'Macedonian portal MRT' and references international media outlets like HINA, these are used as neutral information sources. The災
Why factuality (90): This article closely aligns with the primary source document, mentioning 15 injured people, significant material damage, over 8,300 calls received between 17 and 21 hours, and the impact on infrastructure like the hospital and school. It accurately reflects the situation in Skopje and provides detai
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting facts without emotional language or bias. It reports on the damage and response efforts without taking sides or injecting personal opinion, making it largely objective.
A severe storm struck Skopje on Tuesday, July 21, 2026, bringing heavy rain, strong winds, and hail. The storm caused significant damage, including fallen trees, roof damage, and power outages in parts of the city. Over 15 people were injured, with one elderly woman suffering head injuries after a tree fell on her. Emergency services received over 8,300 calls for assistance between 5 PM and 9 PM on July 21. Municipal authorities responded quickly, stating they acted promptly and responsibly to address the aftermath. No fatalities were reported.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of the natural disaster without overt political commentary. While local officials are mentioned, their statements focus on emergency management rather than political ideology. The tone remains neutral, emphasizing the impact of the storm and the response by市政当局
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports the number of injured (15) and mentions the damage caused by strong winds and rain. It aligns with the primary source document regarding the location (Skopje), injuries, and damage to vehicles and buildings. However, it does not mention the specific hospitals involved
Why objectivity (80): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the impact of the storm without taking sides. The article uses descriptive language but avoids emotional or biased phrasing.
In Skopje, the capital of North Macedonia, severe storms with heavy rain and strong winds caused significant damage on Tuesday, July 22, 2026. Numerous vehicles were damaged, traffic signs and signals were destroyed, and some neighborhoods temporarily lost electricity. Fifteen people were injured, including a elderly woman who suffered head injuries after falling under a fallen tree. The emergency services treated nine patients at the Clinical Center 'Mati Tereza' and six at the University Clinic for Surgery in Ohrid. Over 8,300 calls were received by the crisis management center between 5 PM and 9 PM. Mayor Orce Gjorgjievski announced that municipal teams are removing debris, clearing main avenues, and removing downed trees.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on the natural disaster without overt ideological framing. It provides balanced information about the extent of damage, casualties, and the response efforts by local authorities. There is no evident partisan emphasis or loaded language, making the framing appear
Why factuality (85): This article closely follows the primary source document, accurately reporting the number of injured (15), the hospitals involved, and the cause of injury (falling tree). It also mentions the damage to buildings, traffic signs, and power outages, which align with the primary source. The mention of o
Why objectivity (75): The article maintains a neutral tone, focusing on the facts without adding subjective commentary. It presents the situation objectively, citing official sources and quoting officials like Gjorgjievski without bias.
N1 SlovenijaIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days ago
The article reports on severe weather conditions in Slovenia on Tuesday afternoon, characterized by strong winds and heavy rainfall, leading to 69 reported incidents across the country. In the municipality of Puconci, floodwaters inundated the school gymnasium, while in Odranci, lightning struck and ignited the roof of a residential house. The weather system began over the Gorenjska region near the Karavanke mountains and the Koroska region before moving towards the Savinja and Podravina regions. Heavy rain was recorded at the meteorological station in Mežica, with 47 millimeters measured between 16:10 and 17:20. Flooding was reported in several locations including Dravograd, Prevalje, Raven on the Koroska, and Slovenj Gradac. Thick hail was observed in Kotli, with some reports indicating hail up to five centimeters thick. Firefighters responded to the situation, deploying 45 fire units to handle water extraction, roof repairs, and debris removal. Power outages led to the delivery of generators and cleaning of roadways.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on natural disaster impacts without overt ideological framing. It focuses on environmental and infrastructural effects rather than political discourse, maintaining a balanced tone.
Why factuality (85): The article reports on severe weather affecting Slovenia, including flooding at a school and a fire caused by lightning. It mentions 69 incidents reported by regional centers and details the extent of damage, such as 47 mm of rainfall measured in Mežica. However, it does not directly reference the p
Why objectivity (70): The tone is somewhat sensationalist, using phrases like 'poplavilo šolsko telovadnico' and 'strela zanetila požar', which may imply dramatic consequences. The article also includes promotional content ('Oglaševanje') and less objective reporting on events outside the scope of the primary source.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 70Objective 753 days ago
A video was released showing a sudden flood event in Lošinja, where water rapidly covered everything within seconds. The footage highlights the speed and intensity of the flooding, which likely caused significant disruption in the area. Such incidents often raise concerns about infrastructure resilience and emergency preparedness. Local authorities may need to assess the damage and implement measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future. Residents and local businesses affected by the flood would be impacted both immediately and in the longer term.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event without apparent political commentary or framing. It focuses on the incident itself rather than attributing blame or taking a stance on related policies.
Why factuality (70): The article provides some alignment with the primary source, mentioning the damage to camps and vehicles, and the number of injured. However, it does not include specifics like the hospitals involved or the number of emergency calls. It references a local figure who comments on the event, which adds
Why objectivity (75): The tone remains neutral, focusing on the impact on camp residents and the extent of damage. There is no clear bias or emotional language used.
A powerful storm hit Skopje on Tuesday, causing damage to 15 people and significant property damage. Emergency services received over 8,300 calls within four hours. The storm affected Bosnia and Herzegovina, Italy, and Croatia, with reports of flooded coastal areas, downed trees, and power outages. In Italy, hailstorms caused extensive damage to crops, vehicles, and infrastructure, particularly in regions such as Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy, and Veneto. Local authorities reported economic losses exceeding hundreds of millions of euros.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on natural disaster impacts across multiple countries without overt ideological framing. It includes quotes from social media users and official data from emergency services and news agencies, maintaining a balanced perspective by covering both human impact and灾
Why factuality (70): This article accurately reports the number of injured (15), the hospitals involved, and the damage to infrastructure, matching the primary source. It also mentions the 8,300 emergency calls, which is consistent. While it briefly mentions other regions, it does not significantly diverge from the prim
Why objectivity (65): The article remains largely neutral, providing factual updates without injecting personal opinion or emotional language. It cites official sources and quotes officials without bias.
DeloIndependent🔒CenterFactual 70Objective 603 days ago
The article reports on extreme weather conditions affecting multiple locations in the Adriatic region, including severe storms that disrupted a concert by Bad Bunny in Milan and caused damage on the Croatian island of Lošinj. The storm, referred to as a 'water trombone' (likely a mistranslation or local term for a sudden, intense weather event), led to evacuations, injuries, and significant property damage. On Lošinj, two people were injured and required helicopter evacuation to a hospital in Rijeka. Additionally, a woman was shot while wearing a sunshade at a campsite on the nearby island of Krk, though she remains in critical condition. The storm also affected fishermen, with strong winds capsizing several large yachts.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of natural disaster impacts without overt ideological framing. It covers both the immediate effects of the storm on events like the concert and the broader community impact, including injuries and infrastructure damage. While there is some emphasis on the chaos
Why factuality (70): This article confirms the injury of a woman on Krk due to a lightning strike and includes details about her treatment. It also references the broader weather conditions and the yellow warning issued. It aligns with the other sources and adds specific medical details.
Why objectivity (60): The article remains relatively neutral, focusing on the immediate effects of the storm and the rescue efforts. However, it uses somewhat dramatic language ('strela zadela žensko' – lightning struck the woman) which may subtly influence reader interpretation.
Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 703 days ago
An intense storm hit the popular camping areas of Rapoče and Lopari on the island of Lošinj, causing significant damage. The storm, which occurred during the night of Sunday, led to around 50 trees falling onto vehicles, campers, and tents. The island and the European Union were awakened to the aftermath of the strong winds, heavy rain, and thunderstorms, resulting in numerous issues and injuries across multiple locations on the island. Nature once again demonstrated its power, with strong winds wreaking havoc.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster affecting a tourist area, focusing on the physical impact rather than political implications. While the location is in Slovenia, the event itself is not tied to political figures or policies, making the framing relatively neutral.
Why factuality (65): The article discusses the number of incidents and the involvement of fire departments, which aligns with the primary source. However, it does not mention the specific injuries or the damage to infrastructure in Skopje. It focuses more on regional weather patterns rather than the localized event.
Why objectivity (70): The tone is informative and neutral, discussing the broader weather conditions without taking a stance on the severity of the event.
A severe storm struck Skopje, North Macedonia, on Tuesday afternoon, causing strong winds that damaged roofs, trees, traffic lights, and power lines. Heavy rain led to flooding in homes, with 15 people requiring medical attention, including head injuries and broken bones. The local general hospital and elementary school were among the affected buildings. Emergency services received over 8,300 calls between 17:00 and 21:00. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, heavy rains flooded streets in Sarajevo, while lightning struck approximately 30 sheep near Kupres. Storms also caused meteorological tsunamis on the Adriatic islands of Hvar and Vis, where sea levels rose significantly before receding by about half a meter. These tsunamis are caused by rapid changes in air pressure, which trigger fluctuations in sea level. Similar phenomena were reported earlier this week on the island of Lošinj. Weather forecasts indicate calmer conditions over the Adriatic today, but a yellow warning remains in effect for Croatia’s coast due to strong winds with gale-force gusts.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on natural disasters affecting multiple regions, focusing on weather-related damage and emergency responses. There is no political framing, bias, or commentary on policies, officials, or governance. It presents factual information about the incidents without taking a stance or sl
Why factuality (65): The article reports on weather events in Skopje and Hvar/Vis, but mixes information from different locations. It mentions 15 injured people in Skopje, which matches the primary source, but also adds details about floods in Sarajevo and sheep deaths in Bosnia, not covered in the primary source. The a
Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat sensationalized, using phrases like 'uničujoči veter' and 'poplavljanje domov,' which imply more destruction than the primary source indicates. The article also includes unrelated events in Sarajevo and Bosnia, suggesting a lack of focus and balance.
The article reports on a severe storm that hit Skopje, causing significant damage and injuring multiple people. The storm was described as powerful, with winds tearing through structures and leading to chaos in the city. Emergency services were deployed to assist those affected, and there are concerns about the safety of residents and infrastructure. The incident highlights the potential dangers of extreme weather conditions in urban areas.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual report on a natural disaster without overtly taking a political stance. It focuses on the immediate impact of the storm and does not engage with political discourse or policy implications related to climate change or emergency management. While the event could have a政治
Why factuality (60): This article only mentions the wind causing damage and that multiple people were injured, but it lacks details from the primary source such as the number of injured, specific locations affected, and the response efforts. It also incorrectly implies the storm was widespread beyond Skopje.
Why objectivity (70): The article maintains a neutral tone but focuses more on the destructive power of the wind rather than providing a balanced overview of the situation.
Slovenske noviceIndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 704 days ago
The article reports on the aftermath of severe storms that hit Slovenia on Saturday afternoon, resulting in 33 incidents reported by the national alert center, primarily in the Gorenjska region. Emergency services, including 15 volunteer and one professional fire department unit, responded by extracting water from buildings, repairing damaged roofs, and removing fallen trees. The report warns of potential stronger thunderstorms with strong winds today, particularly in northern regions, while southern areas may remain dry. Meteorologists predict further rainfall and possible flooding in smaller rivers, especially in the north-east, with localized flash floods and waterlogging risks. The hydrological report notes that some rivers have reached medium water levels, and there is a high risk of wildfires in natural areas. Weather forecasts indicate continued rain and strong winds in the evening, with localized hail.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about weather conditions, emergency responses, and flood warnings without taking a clear ideological stance. It provides balanced reporting on the situation, citing official sources such as the National Alert Center, meteorological reports, and hydrological通报
Why factuality (60): The article mentions the number of incidents and the involvement of firefighters, but it lacks specific details from the primary source such as the number of injured, the hospitals involved, and the number of emergency calls. It also focuses more on regional weather patterns rather than the localize
Why objectivity (70): The tone is informative but leans towards describing the broader weather conditions rather than focusing on the specific event in Skopje.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 657 days ago
The headline 'Jadranska obala pod vodo, morje čolne pustilo na suhem' translates to 'Adriatic Coast Underwater, Sea Boats Left on Land,' suggesting a situation where coastal areas are flooded and boats are stranded. The article appears to report on recent flooding along the Adriatic coast, likely due to heavy rainfall or storm activity. It highlights the impact on local communities and infrastructure, with boats being left ashore as water levels rise. While the article does not provide specific dates, locations, or detailed causes, it underscores the environmental and logistical challenges faced by residents and authorities.
Bias read (Center): The article presents a factual account of natural disaster impacts without overtly criticizing or praising any political entity or policy. It focuses on the immediate effects of flooding and the resulting disruption to daily life, without taking a clear ideological stance. The framing remainsneutral
Why factuality (60): The article is very brief and lacks specific details about the event. It only mentions that the Adriatic coast was affected and that boats were left on dry land, but does not reference the primary source document or provide any scientific explanation. This makes it less factual compared to the other
Why objectivity (65): The article is concise and avoids emotional language, but it lacks depth and context. It presents the event in a very general manner without providing enough information to assess the situation objectively.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 554 days ago
A strong storm caused significant damage to a camp on Lošinj, resulting in two people being injured. The incident highlights the impact of severe weather conditions on outdoor structures and activities. Local authorities are likely involved in assessing the situation and providing assistance to those affected. The event serves as a reminder of the risks associated with extreme weather and the importance of safety measures during such conditions.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster event with no apparent political framing, emphasis, or bias. It focuses solely on the incident itself and its immediate effects without taking a stance or highlighting any political implications.
Why factuality (60): This article repeats much of the content from the previous one about Lošinj, including the two injured guests and the use of helicopters. While it does not add significant new information, it still references events not covered in the primary source, such as the extent of damage and the involvement
Why objectivity (55): The article has a similar tone to item 2, emphasizing the impact of the storm through emotive language. It lacks neutrality in describing the event, focusing more on the visual impact rather than presenting an objective account.
Žurnal24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 554 days ago
A violent storm caused by a tornado struck the Croatian island of Lošinj early in the morning, resulting in significant damage to camps in Lopari and Rapoća. The storm uprooted trees, damaged cars, motorhomes, trailers, and tents, with photographs shared by local firefighters showing extensive destruction. Two guests were injured and had to be evacuated by helicopter to the Clinical Hospital Center in Rijeka. Authorities are still assessing the extent of the damage, while emergency teams work to clear debris and manage the aftermath.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster with no explicit political framing, focusing on the event itself, its impact, and the response. There is no indication of ideological bias in the language, sourcing, or emphasis.
Why factuality (60): This article is nearly identical to items 2 and 3, repeating the same information about Lošinj and the two injured guests. It does not introduce any new factual claims beyond those already discussed, but it still references events not covered in the primary source, leading to some inaccuracy.
Why objectivity (55): The article continues the pattern of using emotive language and focusing on the visual impact of the storm. It lacks a balanced perspective and emphasizes the severity of the event more than necessary.
Svet24IndependentCenterFactual 60Objective 554 days ago
A strong storm has caused significant damage to a camp located on Lošinj. The storm was powerful enough to tear apart parts of the camp, leading to potential safety concerns and disruption for those affected. Such severe weather events can pose risks to infrastructure and outdoor facilities, especially in coastal areas. The incident highlights the vulnerability of temporary structures during extreme weather conditions.
Bias read (Center): The article focuses on a natural disaster event, which is generally considered apolitical. There is no indication of political bias in the reporting, as it simply describes the impact of the storm without taking a stance or emphasizing any particular political viewpoint.
Why factuality (60): This article is similar to items 2 and 3, focusing on Lošinj and the damage caused by the storm. It mentions the use of helicopters and the extent of damage, which are not detailed in the primary source. The article also introduces new elements not covered in the primary source, reducing factual acc
Why objectivity (55): The tone remains emotionally charged, using descriptive language that highlights the intensity of the event. The article lacks a neutral stance and prioritizes storytelling over factual reporting.
Gorenjski glasIndependentCenterFactual 55Objective 655 days ago
Na Gorenjskem, Koroškem in Štajerskem so popoldne povzročili težave močan veter in meteorna voda, kar je zahtevalo posredovanje zaradi vetrolomov in poplav. Podatki uprave za zaščito in reševanje prikazujejo, da so gasilci posredovali tudi na območjih Prevalj, Dravograda in Mislinje ter Vranskega. Na Primorskem so se nevihte morda nadaljuje do jutra, medtem ko se v notranjosti države predvidena umiritev. Agencija RS za okolje (Arso) je izdala oranžno in rumeno opozorilo zaradi možnih močnejših neviht, zlasti v osrednjem in jugovzhodnem delu države.
Bias read (Center): Članek predstavlja objektivno poročilo o meteorološki situaciji in posledicah, brez izpostavljanja političnih stališč ali kritike vlade. Uporaba podatkov uprave in Arso je neutralna, brez evidentnega lejnega pridihovanja. Člank je baliran, saj ne izpostavlja nobene strani, ampak samo opisuje dejstva
Why factuality (55): The article is focused on a different location (Lošinj) and does not provide detailed information about Skopje. It mentions flooding and damage but does not reference the primary source document or the specific incident in Skopje. It appears to be reporting on a different event altogether.
Why objectivity (65): The article has a limited scope and focuses on a different region, making it less objective when compared to the primary source. It does not attempt to frame the event in relation to Skopje.
Siol.netState / PublicCenterFactual 55Objective 504 days ago
A powerful tornado struck the popular Croatian island of Lošinj early this morning, causing significant damage to camps in Lopari and Rapoča. The storm uprooted trees and caused extensive destruction to vehicles, motorhomes, and tents. Two guests were injured and had to be evacuated by helicopter to a hospital in Rijeka. Firefighters shared photos from the affected camps, showing the extent of the damage, which has been described as enormous.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster with factual descriptions of the event, including damage and casualties. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It provides information on the impact of the tornado without taking a stance or emphasizing any specific
Why factuality (55): This article again focuses on Lošinj and describes the storm as a 'water tsunami,' which is not mentioned in the primary source. It also mentions the use of helicopters and the extent of damage, which may be exaggerated. The article introduces new elements not found in the primary source, reducing f
Why objectivity (50): The tone is very dramatic, using terms like 'grozljivi prizori' and 'ogromna škoda.' The article appears to prioritize emotional impact over factual precision, making it less objective.
RTV Slovenija (MMC)State / PublicCenterFactual 50Objective 652 days ago
The article reports on severe weather conditions affecting the Adriatic region, including heavy rainfall, strong winds, and hailstorms. The worst conditions are expected in Croatia's Split region, Bosnia and Herzegovina, and southern Serbia, with red weather warnings issued for these areas due to potential flooding and damage. In Rovinj, hailstones the size of apples were reported, causing injuries and disrupting traffic. Local media and authorities have documented the impact, highlighting the severity of the storm system moving across the Adriatic, the Carpathians, and into Serbia, where extreme weather conditions are anticipated.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about weather patterns and their impacts without overt ideological framing. It cites multiple regional and national meteorological services, local media, and emergency units without favoring any particular political stance. While the subject matter involves a
Why factuality (50): The article is focused on a video from Lošinj and does not provide detailed information about Skopje. It mentions flooding and damage but does not reference the primary source document or the specific incident in Skopje. It appears to be reporting on a different location altogether.
Why objectivity (65): The article has a limited scope and focuses on a different region, making it less objective when compared to the primary source. It doesn't attempt to frame the event in relation to Skopje.
VečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 50Objective 454 days ago
On July 19, 2026, severe weather struck the island of Lošinj in Croatia, causing significant damage to campsites in Lopara and Rapoca. Strong winds and heavy rain led to a water wall, uprooting trees, damaging vehicles, and destroying camping equipment and tents. Two campers were seriously injured and transported by helicopter to the Reka Clinical Center for treatment. Firefighters shared photos showing the extent of the destruction, including fallen trees, completely destroyed trailers, damaged car floors, and numerous torn tents. Authorities are currently assessing the total damage and cleaning up the area to ensure safety for remaining tourists and locals.
Bias read (Center): The article reports on a natural disaster and its immediate effects without taking a political stance. It focuses on factual information about the event, the response from emergency services, and the damage caused. There is no evident ideological framing or emphasis on specific political groups, and
Why factuality (50): This article focuses on Lošinj and reports on a storm there, which is not the main event described in the primary source. It mentions two injured guests being flown by helicopter, which is not part of the original report. The article also introduces new elements such as 'water tsunami' and 'guests i
Why objectivity (45): The tone is highly dramatic, using words like 'opustošenje' and 'surova moč narave.' The article seems to emphasize the severity of the event more than what was reported in the primary source, indicating a biased or emotionally charged narrative.
The article discusses recent flooding incidents along the Adriatic coast, specifically mentioning the inundation of Hvar, Pulo, and Mali Lošinj the previous week, followed by similar occurrences on Vis and Korčula. It notes this is the third such event in eight days and raises questions about whether such phenomena could occur in Slovenia as well. The focus is on the potential impact of meteorological events on coastal areas.
Bias read (Center): The article presents information about natural disasters affecting coastal regions without overtly taking a political stance. While it raises concerns about potential impacts on Slovenia, it does not explicitly advocate for any particular political position or policy direction. The framing remains客观
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
