The article discusses a ruling by Slovenia’s Journalists’ Disciplinary Court (NČR) regarding the use of the nickname 'Dr. Smrt' (Doctor Death) by journalists in *Slovenske novice* and *Dela*, which were owned by the media group FMR controlled by businessman Stane Petrič. The court ruled that the term violated journalistic ethics codes by creating an impression that the doctor, Ivan Radan, was responsible for patient deaths, despite being legally cleared of all charges. Radan had filed a high-value compensation claim against the state after being acquitted in a criminal case involving allegations of multiple patient deaths. The journalists argued that the term was used in the context of public interest and did not intend personal harm. The court concluded that the term lacked justification and suggested sensationalism.
Bias read (Center): While the issue involves media ethics and potential political influence through ownership structures, the core dispute centers on journalistic conduct rather than overtly partisan politics. The ruling appears balanced in assessing both sides' arguments, though there is subtle implication of media as
Why these scores (Factual 95 · Objective 70): Factual accuracy is high, aligning closely with the primary source document regarding the ethics case against journalists. The article accurately reports the allegations and the outcome from the disciplinary court. However, the objectivity score is lower due to emotionally charged language such as '


