Municipality and civil initiative against small hydropower plant at Hudičeva brva
The article discusses opposition from the municipality of Škofja Loka and the local civic initiative 'Loka, mesto vseh' against the planned construction of a small hydroelectric plant at Puštal near Hudičeva brv. The project has faced resistance due to concerns over flood safety, the recreational area, river ecosystem, and historical landscape of the town. The construction permit has not yet been legally valid due to objections from the municipality. Opponents argue that the project cannot be treated solely as a private investment, as it could impact public space, water management of Poljanska Sora, and the safety of residents living along the river. The municipality continues to oppose the project, emphasizing the need to consider public interest, environmental protection, and flood safety in decision-making. The issue gained renewed attention after catastrophic floods in August 2023 damaged Hudičeva brv, a notable landmark, leading to the reconstruction of a new bridge with traditional wooden appearance and reinforced steel structure. The project has been proposed by various private investors for over a decade, with the current investor submitting a request in 2020. While the Rez
How each side covered it
The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.
progressive
center
conservative
★
How each side covered it
Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.
Civilna iniciativa Loka, mesto vseh, organizirala je protestni številko ob lokaciji, kjer je načrtovana gradnja male hidroelektrarne (MHE) Puštal. Iniciativa, ki je že leta pripravljala pripombe proti projektu in zbralala podpise, je v juliju 2025 pridobila status stranskega udeleženca v postopku pridobivanja gradbenega dovoljenja. Po večih težavah in sprenevedanjih so junij 2026 dobili vpogled v upravni spis in se udeležili naroka na upravni enoti. Iniciativa zahteva takojšnjo ustavitev postopka in razveljavitev gradbenega dovoljenja, opozoruje na povečano poplavno ogroženost, zmanjšanje pretočnega profila vode in izgubo zgodovinske identitete kraja. Investitor Luka Selak, lastnik drugih hidroelektrarn, omenja postavljanje hidroelektrarn kot hobi, medtem ko lokalna skupnost, občina in ribiško društvo nasprotujejo projektu. Jure Franko, član iniciative, meni, da projekt ni ekonomsko ali tehnično smiselnen.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition to the hydroelectric plant as a moral and environmental imperative, emphasizing local community concerns and questioning the ethics of the investor. The narrative highlights grassroots activism and legal challenges, which aligns with left-leaning perspectives that重视
Why factuality (90): This article accurately describes the ongoing opposition to the hydroelectric project, including the protest at Hudičeva Brva, the legal challenges raised by the municipality, and the role of the civil initiative. The information matches closely with the first article and supports the cross-source c
Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a relatively objective tone, presenting both the community's concerns and the legal steps being taken. While it highlights the community's stance, it does so without overt bias or emotional language, making it more balanced than the first article.
The municipality of Starše is urging landowners and users of agricultural areas to regularly inspect their parcels and promptly remove ambrozija, an invasive alien plant known for causing severe allergic reactions. The municipality has received multiple reports about the spread of this plant within its territory. Ambrozija is particularly problematic due to its pollen, which affects human health, making its removal a matter of public interest. Authorities emphasize that the plant should be removed or mowed before flowering and seed production begins, as timely action prevents further spread and reduces allergenic pollen levels. The municipality calls on residents to take responsibility for maintaining their properties and contributing to public health and environmental protection.
Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about the municipality’s initiative to combat ambrozija without overtly favoring any political ideology. It focuses on public health concerns and environmental management, using neutral language and emphasizing collective responsibility. There is no clear sl抗
Why factuality (85): The article accurately reports that the municipality of Starše is urging landowners to remove Ambrosia, an invasive plant known to cause allergies. It provides general information about the plant’s effects and recommended actions, aligning with common knowledge about invasive species. While no prima
Why objectivity (75): The tone is informative but leans slightly towards promoting public health concerns, using phrases like 'v javnem interesu' which implies a community benefit. The article presents the issue as urgent and important, which may reflect a bias toward environmental protection.
Civilna iniciativa Loka, mesto vseh, organizira protestni shod ob Hudičevi brvi proti gradnji male hidroelektrarne Puštal. Iniciativa, ki je že leta predstavljala pripombe proti projektu in zbralala podpise, je v juliju 2025 pridobila status stranskega udeleženca v postopku pridobivanja gradbenega dovoljenja. Medtem ko je občina Škofja Loka in Civilna iniciativa nasprotujeta gradnji, meni investitor Luka Selak, lastnik več hidroelektrarn, da se projekti izvajajo po zakonu. Iniciativa kritizira projekt zaradi povečanega tveganja za prebivalce, zmanjšanega pretočnega profila vode in zmanjšanega zaščite za zgodovinsko identiteto kraja. Kritiki menijo, da projekt ni ekonomsko ali tehnično smiselnen.
Bias read (Progressive): Artikel emphasizes opposition to the hydroelectric plant from a local community perspective, highlighting environmental concerns, historical identity preservation, and ethical considerations. The framing leans toward portraying the project as harmful and ethically questionable, while downplaying the
The article discusses opposition from the municipality of Škofja Loka and the local civic initiative 'Loka, mesto vseh' against the planned construction of a small hydroelectric plant at Puštal near Hudičeva brv. The project has faced resistance due to concerns over flood safety, the recreational area, river ecosystem, and historical landscape of the town. The construction permit has not yet been legally valid due to objections from the municipality. Opponents argue that the project cannot be treated solely as a private investment, as it could impact public space, water management of Poljanska Sora, and the safety of residents living along the river. The municipality continues to oppose the project, emphasizing the need to consider public interest, environmental protection, and flood safety in decision-making. The issue gained renewed attention after catastrophic floods in August 2023 damaged Hudičeva brv, a notable landmark, leading to the reconstruction of a new bridge with traditional wooden appearance and reinforced steel structure. The project has been proposed by various private investors for over a decade, with the current investor submitting a request in 2020. While the Rez
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the opposition to the hydroelectric plant as a legitimate concern for public interest, environmental protection, and community well-being, aligning with left-leaning values. It emphasizes the role of the municipality and civic initiatives in safeguarding the interests of the local
★
Keep the news honest.
ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.
Slovenia
