ON
← Back to feed
Tina Gaber Pigeon furious with Janša and Kokotova because of the veterinary chaos although the old law still applies
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Progressive7 days ago

Tina Gaber Pigeon furious with Janša and Kokotova because of the veterinary chaos although the old law still applies

The article discusses a situation where Tina Gaber Golob shared a story on Instagram about a dog needing urgent veterinary care, highlighting the lack of available services. She criticized both Janez Janša and Katja Kokot for the current state of the veterinary system, despite the proposed law to reform it still being under consideration. The author argues that the blame is being placed on politicians rather than addressing systemic issues like staff shortages and poor organization. The article criticizes the tendency to assign political blame during crises while ignoring broader structural problems within the veterinary service system.

Tina Gaber Golob has publicly criticized Prime Minister Janez Janša and MP Katja Kokot over the current state of veterinary services in Slovenia, accusing them of failing to address systemic issues despite ongoing legislative efforts. Her complaint, posted on Instagram, describes a situation where her dog required urgent medical attention but was left waiting for hours with no emergency care available. She claims that staff at the clinic informed her that such situations could be attributed to Janša, prompting her sharp response: “Kokotki pa sploh.” The post quickly gained traction online, sparking public debate about the state of veterinary care in the country. The incident highlights a broader issue: the existing legal framework governing veterinary services continues to apply, even though a proposed law aimed at reforming the system has yet to pass. The bill, introduced by the Resni.ca party led by Kokot, is still under parliamentary review and is scheduled for reconsideration in September 2026. Until then, the old legislation remains in force, which many argue has long failed to meet the needs of pet owners and livestock farmers alike. Despite repeated complaints about understaffing and poor service quality, the current system persists, leaving many without reliable access to timely veterinary care. Gaber Golob’s criticism, while directed at political figures, reflects frustration with a system that has not improved despite years of calls for change. The current setup combines both private and public veterinary services, with the latter often struggling to provide adequate coverage, especially during emergencies. Private clinics face their own challenges, including financial strain and regulatory hurdles, further complicating the availability of care. Meanwhile, the proposed reforms aim to separate commercial and public veterinary functions, potentially creating more structured and efficient services. However, these changes remain pending, and the status quo continues to affect both domestic pets and farm animals. In recent days, similar reports have emerged from rural areas, where conditions have worsened. In Križevci, five cows were found dead, while three others were in severe distress, leading to one being euthanized. Two surviving cattle were removed from their owner's possession and transferred to a temporary barn for proper care. These animals will be sent to the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine at the University of Ljubljana for thorough examinations to determine causes of death and preserve evidence for further legal proceedings. The State Inspectorate for Food Safety, Veterinary Services, and Plant Protection has initiated an investigation into the incident, emphasizing its adherence to current laws and regulations. Another report from Maribor24 describes a grim discovery on a local farm, where inspectors uncovered the bodies of five deceased cattle, alongside three others in critical condition. One animal was euthanized due to the severity of its health issues, while two remaining live cattle were taken away from the owner and placed in a holding facility for appropriate treatment. The authorities stated that all findings would be reviewed at the university, and that they would take necessary actions based on collected data and expert assessments. At this stage, additional information is restricted due to the ongoing nature of the inquiry. While public outrage focuses on individual politicians, the deeper challenge lies in the structural inefficiencies within the veterinary sector. Many argue that the lack of investment in infrastructure, staffing, and training has created a crisis that neither current nor proposed policies have adequately addressed. As the debate continues, the focus shifts between political blame and the need for comprehensive reform. With the proposed law still months away from potential approval, the immediate reality remains unchanged: the system continues to fail, and those affected continue to seek answers.

Go to the primary sources (1)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

3 reports

Maribor24 logoMaribor24IndependentCenterFactual 90Objective 859 days ago
Horrifying discovery on a Slovenian farm: Inspectors found five bodies, other animals in desperate condition

Five dead cows were discovered on a Slovenian farm, with three additional animals found in poor health. One of the sick animals was euthanized due to its severe condition, while the other two were removed from the owner’s premises and placed in a temporary barn for veterinary care. The authorities stated they would transport the deceased animals to the Veterinary Faculty in Ljubljana for investigations into the cause of death and to preserve evidence needed for further legal procedures. The process is ongoing, and additional information cannot be disclosed at this time.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about an animal welfare incident and the subsequent investigation by authorities. There is no evident ideological framing, loaded language, or one-sided sourcing. It focuses on procedural actions taken by the relevant administration without apparent bias.

Why factuality (90): This article provides detailed information matching the other sources, including the number of dead and sick cattle, the euthanasia of one animal, and the relocation of others. It accurately reflects the actions of the authorities and the process being undertaken, showing consistency with the cross-

Why objectivity (85): The article maintains a neutral tone throughout, presenting the events and responses without overt bias. It avoids emotional language and focuses on reporting the facts as they are presented by the authorities, keeping the focus on the procedural aspects.

Večer logoVečerIndependent🔒CenterFactual 85Objective 759 days ago
Five cattle were found dead at the Križevci, two animals were taken from the owner, one had to be euthanized

In Križevci, pet govedi je bilo najdeno mrtvih, medtem ko so tri živali v Iljaševcih imeli zelo slabe zdravstvene razmere. Eno žival je bilo treba evtanazirati zaradi težave z zdravjem. Dve živali sta bila trajno odvzeta in premestita v prehodni hlev za veterinarsko oskrbo. Poginjene živali bodo prepeljane na Veterinarsko fakulteto Univerze v Ljubljani za pregled in preiskavo vzrokov pogina. Uprava RS za varno hrano, veterinarstvo in varstvo rastlin bo nadaljuje s postopkom in spremljala ukrepe v skladu z zakonodajo.

Bias read (Center): The article reports on an animal welfare incident involving livestock deaths and veterinary procedures. While the issue relates to agricultural practices and public health regulations, which can have political implications, the tone and framing remain neutral. The focus is on factual reporting of an

Why factuality (85): The article reports on an incident where five cows were found dead and others in poor condition, with one euthanized. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles about the discovery and actions taken by authorities. The details match the general narrative but lacks specific data li

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat formal but contains some emotionally charged language when describing the state of the animals. While it presents facts neutrally, there is a subtle emphasis on the severity of the situation, which may lean towards eliciting concern rather than maintaining strict neutrality.

Nova24TV logoNova24TVParty-alignedProgressiveFactual 60Objective 557 days ago
Tina Gaber Pigeon furious with Janša and Kokotova because of the veterinary chaos although the old law still applies

The article discusses a situation where Tina Gaber Golob shared a story on Instagram about a dog needing urgent veterinary care, highlighting the lack of available services. She criticized both Janez Janša and Katja Kokot for the current state of the veterinary system, despite the proposed law to reform it still being under consideration. The author argues that the blame is being placed on politicians rather than addressing systemic issues like staff shortages and poor organization. The article criticizes the tendency to assign political blame during crises while ignoring broader structural problems within the veterinary service system.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the criticism against political figures (Janša and Kokot) as a result of their perceived failure to address systemic issues, even though the proposed reforms are still pending. It emphasizes the political manipulation of public concern over animal welfare, suggesting that the real

Why factuality (60): While this article mentions the broader issue of veterinary service shortcomings, it diverges significantly from the main event described in the other articles. It introduces a different topic (a personal story and political commentary) that is not directly related to the cattle incident, making it

Why objectivity (55): The article has a strongly opinionated tone, criticizing political figures and suggesting a pattern of blame-shifting. This editorializing reduces its objectivity, as it frames the issue in a way that implies responsibility on specific individuals rather than focusing on the factual situation.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories