ON
← Back to feed
US Senate committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt over Covid hearing
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenter3 hr. ago

US Senate committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt over Covid hearing

A U.S. Senate committee has voted to hold former National Institutes of Health Director Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer questions during a hearing regarding his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The vote occurred along party lines, leading to a referral to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution for non-compliance with a congressional subpoena. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment rights over 100 times, claiming that Kentucky Senator Rand Paul sought to prosecute him. Paul accused Fauci of concealing the origins of the virus and funding a Wuhan laboratory, while most scientists suggest an animal origin. Former President Joe Biden granted Fauci a pardon covering actions through 2025, but he could still face charges post-2025 or at the state level. Fauci denies wrongdoing and accuses Paul of personal vendetta.

1 reports

BBC News (World) logoBBC News (World)State / PublicCenter3 hr. ago
US Senate committee votes to hold Fauci in contempt over Covid hearing

A U.S. Senate committee has voted to hold former National Institutes of Health Director Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he refused to answer questions during a hearing regarding his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. The vote occurred along party lines, leading to a referral to the Department of Justice for possible prosecution for non-compliance with a congressional subpoena. Fauci invoked his Fifth Amendment rights over 100 times, claiming that Kentucky Senator Rand Paul sought to prosecute him. Paul accused Fauci of concealing the origins of the virus and funding a Wuhan laboratory, while most scientists suggest an animal origin. Former President Joe Biden granted Fauci a pardon covering actions through 2025, but he could still face charges post-2025 or at the state level. Fauci denies wrongdoing and accuses Paul of personal vendetta.

Bias read (Center): The article presents both sides of the controversy: Fauci's legal arguments and Paul's accusations. It does not overtly favor one side over the other, though it includes quotes from both parties. The framing appears balanced, avoiding strong ideological slant.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories