ON
← Back to feed
US plans to cut off military aid to key Middle East ally, BBC told
United Kingdom🏛️ PoliticsCenteryesterday

US plans to cut off military aid to key Middle East ally, BBC told

The Trump administration is reportedly considering cutting off military aid to the semi-autonomous Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) in Iraq, a key US ally in the fight against the Islamic State (IS). This decision comes as the KRG faces increasing pressure from Iran, which has launched numerous missile and drone attacks on Iraqi Kurdistan. The current security assistance agreement between the Pentagon and the KRG is set to expire on 30 September, coinciding with the withdrawal of the last US troops from Iraq. Analysts warn that ending this support could weaken the KRG and strengthen Iran's influence in the region. The KRG has relied heavily on US funding for weapons, training, and stipends, but the Pentagon has proposed eliminating this aid in its 2027 budget, citing the defeat of IS as justification.

The U.S. government is preparing to terminate military aid to a vital Middle East ally, according to four undisclosed sources with knowledge of internal deliberations. The ally in question is the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG), whose security forces, known as the Peshmerga, played a pivotal role in defeating the Islamic State group (IS). The decision comes as the KRG faces intensified attacks from Iran, which has launched numerous missile and drone strikes into Iraqi Kurdistan. Recent meetings between U.S. defense officials and KRG leadership revealed that the Department of Defense does not intend to renew an expiring agreement that provides security assistance to the Peshmerga. This agreement, originally signed in 2016 and extended in 2022, is due to expire on 30 September. The move coincides with the planned withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq, marking the formal end of the international military campaign against IS. The last U.S. military base in the country, located in Irbil, will close next month after coalition forces depart. Two officials who took part in these discussions and three additional sources confirmed the decision. They described the talks under conditions of anonymity, citing the sensitivity of the information. Kurdish officials fear that ending the financial support will create a power vacuum, potentially allowing Iran to gain influence over the region. Since President Donald Trump initiated hostilities with Tehran, Iran has launched hundreds of missile and drone attacks into Iraqi Kurdistan, with 158 such incidents recorded by late May, according to research from the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Analysts warn that severing ties with the Peshmerga could damage long-standing trust between the U.S. and its regional partners. Yerevan Saeed, director of the Global Kurdish Initiative for Peace at American University, expressed concern over the potential consequences. “This is going to be a big win for Iran, China, and Russia if the Kurds are left so exposed,” he stated. Under his second presidential term, Trump has emphasized reducing U.S. involvement in global conflicts, including those in the Middle East. His administration’s approach has led to increased tensions with Iran, which continues to escalate its actions against U.S. interests. The decision to withdraw from Iraq aligns with this strategy, though it raises questions about the future of regional stability. The Pentagon’s fiscal year 2027 budget proposal initially called for an end to all security aid to the Peshmerga, arguing that the funds should be redirected following the defeat of IS. However, the budget proposal remains pending due to ongoing disputes within Congress. Despite these delays, Kurdish officials had hoped for an extension of the current agreement. Their concerns have deepened as Iran intensifies its attacks, making the need for continued support more urgent. While the Pentagon has not yet made a final determination, internal discussions suggest that the U.S. is exploring alternative methods to provide limited security support. These considerations include maintaining some level of engagement in both Iraq and the Kurdish region. A final decision on the matter is expected to be announced shortly, pending further review and consultation. The outcome will likely shape the balance of power in the region and determine whether the U.S. can continue to support its allies amidst growing geopolitical challenges.

1 reports

BBC News (World) logoBBC News (World)State / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
US plans to cut off military aid to key Middle East ally, BBC told

The Trump administration is reportedly considering cutting off military aid to the semi-autonomous Kurdish Regional Government (KRG) in Iraq, a key US ally in the fight against the Islamic State (IS). This decision comes as the KRG faces increasing pressure from Iran, which has launched numerous missile and drone attacks on Iraqi Kurdistan. The current security assistance agreement between the Pentagon and the KRG is set to expire on 30 September, coinciding with the withdrawal of the last US troops from Iraq. Analysts warn that ending this support could weaken the KRG and strengthen Iran's influence in the region. The KRG has relied heavily on US funding for weapons, training, and stipends, but the Pentagon has proposed eliminating this aid in its 2027 budget, citing the defeat of IS as justification.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple anonymous sources and includes quotes from analysts and officials without overtly favoring any side. It reports on the potential U.S. policy change and its implications without using biased language or selectively omitting perspectives.

Why factuality (85): The article reports on multiple sources familiar with the matter and cites officials who participated in the talks. It presents the information as coming from unnamed but credible sources, aligning with the cross-source consensus that the US is considering ending military aid to the Kurdish forces.

Why objectivity (70): The article uses emotionally charged language such as 'big win for Iran, China, and Russia' and frames the potential aid cut as a betrayal of the Kurds. This suggests a pro-Kurdish perspective and lacks balance by not presenting opposing viewpoints.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories