ON
← Back to feed
US judge rejects Trump’s bid to switch hush-money case to federal court
Qatar🏛️ PoliticsCenter9 hr. ago

US judge rejects Trump’s bid to switch hush-money case to federal court

A U.S. judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's attempt to move his hush-money case from state to federal court, denying his request for a third time. Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that Trump's arguments for transferring the case were neither new nor legally valid. Trump was previously convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment made to Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet about an alleged affair during his 2016 presidential campaign. Prosecutors argued this was intended to influence the election, though Trump denies the affair occurred. Despite a recent Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, the judge stated such actions are not protected under immunity. Trump's legal team plans to appeal the decision, calling it 'baseless and lawless.'

1 reports

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishState / PublicCenter9 hr. ago
US judge rejects Trump’s bid to switch hush-money case to federal court

A U.S. judge has rejected former President Donald Trump's attempt to move his hush-money case from state to federal court, denying his request for a third time. Judge Alvin Hellerstein ruled that Trump's arguments for transferring the case were neither new nor legally valid. Trump was previously convicted of 34 counts of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment made to Stormy Daniels to keep her quiet about an alleged affair during his 2016 presidential campaign. Prosecutors argued this was intended to influence the election, though Trump denies the affair occurred. Despite a recent Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, the judge stated such actions are not protected under immunity. Trump's legal team plans to appeal the decision, calling it 'baseless and lawless.'

Bias read (Center): The article presents the legal proceedings against Trump in a neutral manner, focusing on the judicial decisions and legal arguments without overtly favoring either side. It includes direct quotes from both the judge and Trump's legal team, providing balanced perspectives.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories