ON
← Back to feed
U.S. Army: Secretary of State Daniel Driscoll resigns after disagreement with Pete Hegseth
Germany🏛️ PoliticsCenter9/1/2026

U.S. Army: Secretary of State Daniel Driscoll resigns after disagreement with Pete Hegseth

Der US-Staatssekretär im Verteidigungsministerium, Daniel Driscoll, hat sein Amt aufgelassen, nachdem er mit Pete Hegseth, dem Verteidigungsminister, umstritten war. Driscoll, ein enger Vertrauter von Vizepräsident JD Vance, war nur anderthalb Jahre im Amt und war während der Verhandlungen über eine Friedenslösung zwischen der Ukraine und Russland Teil der US-Delegation. Das US-Militär wird üblicherweise von einem zivilen Staatssekretär und einem militärischen Stabschef geleitet. Hegseth drängte Anfang April den damaligen Stabschef, General Randy George, zum Rücktritt, wobei Driscoll mit George eng zusammenarbeitete. Mehrere US-Medien berichten von anhaltenden Spannungen zwischen Hegseth und Driscoll, insbesondere aufgrund der engen Verbindung Driscolls zu Vance sowie seiner Beziehung zu Donald Trump.

The U.S. Army’s chief civilian official, Daniel Driscoll, has resigned after months of conflict with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Driscoll, who served just over 18 months in his role, was known as a close confidant of Vice President JD Vance. His departure marks another shift within the military leadership under President Donald Trump, following several high-profile resignations in recent months. Driscoll had worked closely with the previous Chief of Staff, General Randy George, before George was forced to step down in early April. Hegseth, who describes himself as “War Minister,” reportedly had strained relations with Driscoll, particularly due to the latter’s close ties to Vance. The two had attended university together and remained friends, while Driscoll also maintained a favorable relationship with former President Donald Trump. According to multiple U.S. media reports, ongoing tensions between Hegseth and Driscoll were cited as the primary reason for Driscoll’s resignation. Sources suggest that Hegseth distrusted Driscoll, especially given his association with Vance. Driscoll, a veteran of the Iraq War, had been instrumental in advancing Trump’s agenda within the Department of Defense. His tenure saw him advocate for faster development of drone technology and counter-drone systems, as well as support efforts toward a peace settlement between Russia and Ukraine. The White House confirmed Driscoll’s resignation on Monday, though it did not specify the reasons behind his departure. A spokesperson for the Office of the Vice President, Anna Kelly, praised Driscoll for his contributions, stating he had “excellently supported President Trump’s agenda” and demonstrated “outstanding leadership qualities.” She added that his work helped strengthen the readiness of the U.S. Army and contributed to diplomatic efforts involving Russia and Ukraine. This latest resignation follows a string of departures among senior military officials under Trump. In April, Hegseth had ordered General Randy George, the head of the Army’s staff, to resign. Also in April, the Pentagon announced that Marine Corps Undersecretary John Phelan would step down unexpectedly. In June, General Christopher Donahue, commander of U.S. Army Europe and Africa, left his post abruptly. Driscoll played a unique role during his time in office, particularly in the effort to broker a ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine. He was part of the U.S. delegation engaged in peace talks and advocated for more aggressive technological advancements in defense capabilities. As a trusted advisor to Vance, Driscoll had been a key figure in shaping policy decisions related to national security and military strategy. A former military officer and tech investor, Driscoll was confirmed by the Senate in February 2025 with bipartisan support, 66 votes to 28. His resignation comes amid continued instability within the Trump administration’s military apparatus, raising questions about the long-term direction of defense policy and leadership continuity. With Driscoll’s exit, the focus will likely shift to how Hegseth navigates the remaining challenges in reshaping the military structure under his watch.

How this report was made. Objective News wrote this report from 2 source articles, using AI-assisted synthesis under our methodology. It is our own text, not a copy of any single outlet. Read our methodology.

Responsible editor: Matej BašaSpotted an error? Report it

2 reports

Der Spiegel logoDer SpiegelIndependentCenterFactual 80Objective 759/1/2026
U.S. Army: Secretary of State Daniel Driscoll resigns after disagreement with Pete Hegseth

Der US-Staatssekretär im Verteidigungsministerium, Daniel Driscoll, hat sein Amt aufgelassen, nachdem er mit Pete Hegseth, dem Verteidigungsminister, umstritten war. Driscoll, ein enger Vertrauter von Vizepräsident JD Vance, war nur anderthalb Jahre im Amt und war während der Verhandlungen über eine Friedenslösung zwischen der Ukraine und Russland Teil der US-Delegation. Das US-Militär wird üblicherweise von einem zivilen Staatssekretär und einem militärischen Stabschef geleitet. Hegseth drängte Anfang April den damaligen Stabschef, General Randy George, zum Rücktritt, wobei Driscoll mit George eng zusammenarbeitete. Mehrere US-Medien berichten von anhaltenden Spannungen zwischen Hegseth und Driscoll, insbesondere aufgrund der engen Verbindung Driscolls zu Vance sowie seiner Beziehung zu Donald Trump.

Bias read (Center): Die Berichte erwähnen Spannungen zwischen Hegseth und Driscoll, aber es wird keine klare politische Richtung oder emotionale Bewertung gegeben. Die Quellen werden neutral genannt, und es wird keine starke parteipolitische Haltung oder Framing gezeigt. Es wird lediglich die Tatsache des Rücktritts pr

Why factuality (80): This article provides more detailed information, including the White House statement confirming Driscoll’s resignation and mentions his close ties to Vice President JD Vance. It also references multiple media outlets and contextualizes his departure within broader changes in military leadership unde

Why objectivity (75): While the article presents the events objectively, it includes some subjective phrasing such as 'äußerst erfolgreich' (extremely successful) and 'verantwortungsvolle Führungsqualitäten' (responsible leadership qualities), which may reflect a positive editorial stance toward Driscoll.

Die Zeit logoDie ZeitIndependentCenterFactual 65Objective 708/31/2026
U.S. Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll resigns

Der US-Heeresstaatssekretär Dan Driscoll hat nach 18 Monaten im Amt seinen Rücktritt angekündigt. Laut Medienberichten stand er mehrmals im Konflikt mit Verteidigungsminister Pete Hegseth. Das Weiße Haus begründete den Rücktritt nicht direkt, betonte jedoch Driscolls Erfolge bei der Umsetzung der Politik von Präsident Donald Trump sowie seine Führungsqualitäten im Militär. Driscolls Abgang folgt auf eine Reihe von Veränderungen in der militärischen Führung unter Trump, darunter die Entlassung von General Randy George und Marine-Staatssekretär John Phelan. Driscoll war auch als Berater von Vizepräsident JD Vance tätig und spielte eine besondere Rolle bei Verhandlungen zur Beendigung des Ukraine-Krieges.

Bias read (Center): Die Berichterstattung bleibt neutral und konzentriert sich auf Fakten wie Driscolls Rücktritt, seine Rolle im Militär und die politischen Kontroversen mit Hegseth. Es wird keine klare parteiliche Haltung oder emotionale Bewertung gezeigt. Die Quellen werden objektiv zitiert, und es wird keine starke

Why factuality (65): The article reports that Dan Driscoll has resigned after 18 months, citing conflicts with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. It aligns with the cross-source consensus from other articles, but lacks specific details on the reasons for his resignation. The mention of the White House announcement adds cre

Why objectivity (70): The tone remains neutral, presenting the facts without overt bias. However, there is a slight emphasis on the political implications of Driscoll’s resignation, particularly his relationship with Vice President JD Vance, which may introduce subtle editorializing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories