ON
← Back to feed
US has used ‘virtually all’ of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say
PH🏛️ PoliticsCenter13 hr. ago

US has used ‘virtually all’ of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say

According to three anonymous sources familiar with the data, the U.S. Army has used 'virtually all' of its stockpile of long-range precision missiles, specifically Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), during the five-month war with Iran. These missiles, costing over $1 million each, are critical for long-range strikes and have been used in the war in Ukraine. While some sources note that Central Command has been able to reload from supplies elsewhere, analysts warn that current production levels may not be sufficient for prolonged conflicts. The White House, under former President Donald Trump, dismissed concerns, claiming the U.S. has 'far more munitions than anyone in the world.' Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon did not immediately comment on the situation.

The U.S. military has reportedly used nearly all of its long-range precision missiles during the ongoing conflict with Iran, according to undisclosed sources. This revelation has raised alarms within military circles about the potential strain on the armed forces' capacity to conduct sustained operations against adversarial states. The depletion of these critical munitions comes amid a five-month-long war that has seen intense aerial and ground engagements, with the United States playing a central role in targeting Iranian assets. The depleted stockpiles include the Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS) and the newer Precision Strike Missile (PrSM), both of which are essential for delivering high-accuracy strikes from a safe distance. These weapons, which cost over $1 million each, have been instrumental in recent military campaigns, including support for Ukrainian forces in eastern Europe. The PrSM, designed to eventually replace the ATACMS, offers greater range and precision, making it particularly valuable in scenarios involving heavily defended targets. However, the near exhaustion of these systems suggests a growing concern over the sustainability of U.S. military operations in protracted conflicts. According to the sources, the U.S. has consumed “virtually all” of its available stock of these long-range missiles, though exact numbers remain undisclosed. While some reports indicate that Central Command, responsible for overseeing U.S. forces in the Middle East, has managed to replenish its inventory through reserves stored in other regions, the overall situation underscores a broader challenge in maintaining strategic readiness. The depletion of these resources has led to internal discussions within the Trump administration regarding the risks associated with continued strikes against Iran, particularly as the war has extended beyond initial expectations. President Donald Trump, who initiated the campaign alongside Israeli leaders in early February, has maintained that the U.S. possesses an ample supply of munitions, surpassing global standards. In a statement, he emphasized that American defense contractors are producing weapons at unprecedented rates, with additional efforts underway to expand production facilities. Despite these assurances, military analysts warn that even with increased output, the current rate of consumption may not sustain prolonged engagement with major powers such as Russia or China. The implications of this weapon shortage extend beyond immediate operational concerns. With the PrSM set to replace the ATACMS, the loss of these systems could delay the deployment of more advanced weaponry, potentially weakening the U.S.’s deterrent posture against emerging threats. Analysts suggest that the reliance on long-range precision missiles is especially crucial in conflicts involving nations with robust air defenses, such as China, where traditional bombing methods may prove ineffective. Several defense contractors, including Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, were contacted for comment but did not provide responses. Meanwhile, a Pentagon spokesperson reiterated the strength of the U.S. military's capabilities, stating that the nation maintains a vast array of offensive and defensive tools to meet global security challenges. However, the lack of transparency surrounding actual stock levels continues to fuel speculation about the true extent of the U.S. military’s preparedness for future confrontations.

1 reports

Rappler logoRapplerIndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 7013 hr. ago
US has used ‘virtually all’ of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war, sources say

According to three anonymous sources familiar with the data, the U.S. Army has used 'virtually all' of its stockpile of long-range precision missiles, specifically Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) and Precision Strike Missiles (PrSM), during the five-month war with Iran. These missiles, costing over $1 million each, are critical for long-range strikes and have been used in the war in Ukraine. While some sources note that Central Command has been able to reload from supplies elsewhere, analysts warn that current production levels may not be sufficient for prolonged conflicts. The White House, under former President Donald Trump, dismissed concerns, claiming the U.S. has 'far more munitions than anyone in the world.' Defense contractors like Lockheed Martin and Raytheon did not immediately comment on the situation.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from unnamed sources regarding U.S. military readiness, which could be interpreted as either left or right leaning depending on context. However, the tone remains neutral, presenting both the concern raised by the sources and the official response from the WhiteHouse

Why factuality (85): The article reports that US has used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during the Iran war, citing anonymous sources. It provides details about the types of missiles (ATACMS and PrSM) and their strategic importance. While no primary source is available, the information aligns with

Why objectivity (70): The article presents the situation with some concern and quotes unnamed sources, which can introduce bias. The mention of analysts' views on the importance of these weapons in potential conflicts with China adds a speculative element. The tone suggests concern about military readiness, which may ref

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories