ON
← Back to feed
Israel's far-right police minister calls for "30 to 40" killings a night in Gaza
Austria🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 days ago

Israel's far-right police minister calls for "30 to 40" killings a night in Gaza

The article reports on remarks made by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's far-right police minister, who suggested carrying out '30 to 40' killings of Palestinians in Gaza per night. Ben-Gvir claimed these individuals pose a threat and implied that many more people in Gaza do not deserve to live. The Israeli Jewish Community Council (IKG) condemned his comments as a 'shame' for both the Jewish people and the state of Israel, calling for him to be removed from office. Iranian Vice Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also criticized the remarks, accusing Ben-Gvir of hypocrisy regarding Palestinian displacement and settlement expansion. The article notes that these comments came ahead of mediation talks involving U.S. envoy Jared Kushner, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and Hamas representatives. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed Israel's stance against withdrawing forces from Gaza until Hamas is disarmed and rejected a plan for a Palestinian state.

U.S. envoys are meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to discuss President Donald Trump’s proposed peace plan for Gaza. The talks come after U.S. representatives Jared Kushner and Nickolay Mladenov held discussions in Cairo today with mediators from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey. According to diplomatic circles, some of these meetings included representatives from the radical Islamist terrorist organization Hamas. Kushner, who is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka, also met with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi. Netanyahu had previously rejected Trump’s latest proposal for a peace solution, calling it unacceptable. A senior Israeli government official stated that Israel is particularly concerned about Washington’s demand to stop targeted killings of Hamas members. Trump’s plan calls for an immediate end to military operations in the Gaza Strip, with Hamas disarming while Israeli troops withdraw and the area is rebuilt under a new Palestinian civilian administration. Trump declared last month that there was a breakthrough in his plan, which both sides had agreed to. Hamas stated it had accepted the plan to prevent further war, but implementation depends on Israel fulfilling its commitments. Despite diplomatic efforts, Israel has continued its air strikes in the Gaza Strip. Medical sources reported that several people were injured in attacks in Khan Younis and the Nuseirat refugee camp today. For Trump, this would be a “major milestone” for his largely stalled peace plan for the Gaza Strip. Hamas, which holds control over the remnants of the heavily destroyed coastal strip, recently agreed to hand over its weapons to a new transitional Palestinian government in the Gaza Strip. This would mark the first significant progress for Trump’s peace plan since he announced it last year, bypassing the United Nations and other international organizations. However, in Jerusalem, the government remains skeptical of Hamas’s commitments. Netanyahu’s government continues to reject the peace plan and insists there will never be a Palestinian state, whether in the Gaza Strip or the West Bank. Netanyahu argues that complete disarmament of Hamas must occur before Israel withdraws its troops from the Gaza Strip. Currently, Israeli forces occupy two-thirds of the territory. Hundreds of thousands have been displaced due to the war and continue living in makeshift refugee camps in the non-occupied parts of the Gaza Strip, enduring deplorable conditions. There is chronic shortages of water, food, and housing capable of withstanding the upcoming autumn and winter rains. As the U.S. special envoy, Kushner is again traveling through the region and maintaining direct contact with Hamas. On Sunday, he spoke with leading Hamas figures in Egypt about Trump’s peace plan. Kushner continues to exclude Hamas participation in future Gaza governance, despite new Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya reaffirming their commitment to the peace plan. Meanwhile, Muslim-majority states condemned Israel’s rejection of the Gaza peace plan. In a joint statement, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Turkey criticized Israel’s stance. In response to the diplomatic push, right-wing Israeli Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir escalated tensions with comments that caused outrage in the Arab world. In a podcast, he called for even more violence in the Gaza Strip, stating that there are people there who are not even human and should be eliminated through targeted killings. He suggested killing 30 to 40 people each night, not just Hamas fighters posing an immediate threat but anyone deemed unworthy of life. Ben-Gvir claimed the entire Gaza Strip belongs to Israel and argued that Palestinians should either leave voluntarily or be removed through force. The Jewish community in Austria criticized Ben-Gvir’s remarks, calling them a disgrace. The president of the Israelite Cultural Community (IKG) for the regions of Salzburg, Styria, and Carinthia described him as a shame for the entire Jewish people and a disgrace for the State of Israel. He urged the Israeli government to take visible consequences and remove Ben-Gvir from office. The statements highlight the minister's contemptible attitude and political danger. Iranian Vice Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi condemned the remarks on social media, stating that such a Zionist criminal speaks simultaneously about the displacement of Palestinians and settlement building throughout the Gaza Strip. He emphasized that these confessions must be recorded and preserved for the day of reckoning and for the trial against these criminals. These statements came amid new mediation talks led by Kushner in the region. On Sunday, he held discussions in Egypt with President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi and representatives of the Islamist terrorist organization Hamas regarding the future of the Gaza Strip. Today, he is scheduled to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, along with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair and the High Representative of the Peace Council, Nikolay Mladenov. Netanyahu reiterated last week that Israel rejects the so-called “Peace Board” roadmap for the heavily damaged Gaza Strip. He stated that the Israeli army will not withdraw until Hamas is disarmed. Additionally, he reaffirmed his opposition to an independent Palestinian state. A high-ranking Hamas representative, Bassem Naim, stated that Hamas remains committed to the Gaza roadmap. According to a senior Israeli government official, Israel is particularly concerned about Washington’s demand to cease targeted killings of Hamas members. Trump’s plan calls for an immediate end to military operations in the Gaza Strip. Although a ceasefire has been in effect since October, more than 1,200 people have been killed in Israeli attacks since then.

4 reports

ORF News logoORF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 708 days ago
U.S. envoys discuss peace plan for Gaza

The article reports on ongoing diplomatic efforts regarding the U.S.-proposed Gaza peace plan. U.S. representatives, including Jared Kushner and Nickolay Mladenov, are meeting with mediators from Egypt, Qatar, and Turkey, with some sessions involving Hamas representatives. The Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has criticized the latest version of the plan proposed by former President Donald Trump, particularly the requirement to halt targeted killings of Hamas members. Trump previously claimed there was progress and mutual agreement, but implementation depends on Israel fulfilling its commitments. Meanwhile, Israel continues military operations in Gaza, resulting in civilian casualties.

Bias read (Center): The article presents information from multiple perspectives, including Israeli criticism of the U.S. plan and Hamas' conditional acceptance. It does not overtly favor one side over another, though it highlights the complexity and ongoing tensions. There is no clear ideological slant in the framing,儘

Why factuality (85): The article reports on diplomatic discussions regarding Trump's Gaza peace plan, citing sources such as diplomats and officials. It mentions specific names like Jared Kushner and Benjamin Netanyahu, aligning with known public figures involved in these negotiations. The content reflects a cross-sourc

Why objectivity (70): The article presents information from multiple sides but maintains a somewhat pro-Israel perspective, particularly in highlighting concerns over Trump's plan and ongoing military actions. The language used to describe Hamas's participation is neutral, but the overall tone leans slightly towards ackn

ORF News logoORF NewsState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 657 days ago
Trump envoy Kushner to Israel

Jared Kushner, a senior advisor to former U.S. President Donald Trump and his son-in-law, arrived in Israel after meeting with representatives of the radical Islamist terrorist organization Hamas in Egypt. He met with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to promote Trump's stalled Gaza peace plan. The plan includes a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, the disarmament of Hamas, and the gradual withdrawal of Israeli forces from the Gaza Strip. However, Israel fears that stored weapons could become accessible again. Hamas remains committed to the plan but conditions the surrender of heavy weapons on the establishment of a Palestinian state, which Israel opposes. Trump hinted at possibly endorsing a candidate in Israel's upcoming October parliamentary election.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about Kushner's meetings and the proposed peace plan without overtly favoring any side. It reports on both Israeli and Hamas positions, including their respective concerns and conditions, without using biased language or selective sourcing.

Why factuality (80): The article accurately reports Kushner's meetings with Hamas and Netanyahu, including the involvement of Nikolay Mladenov. It references the Trump-led Peace Council's plan and outlines the positions of both sides without adding speculative information. The reporting is based on available public info

Why objectivity (65): While the article presents both sides of the negotiation, it slightly favors the U.S. and Israeli perspectives by emphasizing the stalled nature of the peace plan and the concerns of the Israeli military. There is some editorializing in the description of Hamas as a 'radikalislamischen Terrororganis

Der Standard logoDer StandardIndependentProgressiveFactual 70Objective 457 days ago
Israel's far-right police minister calls for "30 to 40" killings a night in Gaza

The article reports on remarks made by Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's far-right police minister, who suggested carrying out '30 to 40' killings of Palestinians in Gaza per night. Ben-Gvir claimed these individuals pose a threat and implied that many more people in Gaza do not deserve to live. The Israeli Jewish Community Council (IKG) condemned his comments as a 'shame' for both the Jewish people and the state of Israel, calling for him to be removed from office. Iranian Vice Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi also criticized the remarks, accusing Ben-Gvir of hypocrisy regarding Palestinian displacement and settlement expansion. The article notes that these comments came ahead of mediation talks involving U.S. envoy Jared Kushner, Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, and Hamas representatives. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu reaffirmed Israel's stance against withdrawing forces from Gaza until Hamas is disarmed and rejected a plan for a Palestinian state.

Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the remarks of Itamar Ben-Gvir as extreme and condemns them as 'a shame,' aligning with criticism from the Israeli Jewish Community Council and Iranian officials. The emphasis on the moral and ethical implications of Ben-Gvir's statements, along with calls for his removal from the

Why factuality (70): The article provides specific numbers from Ben-Gvir's statements and includes reactions from religious leaders and Iran. These details are generally corroborated by public records of his rhetoric. However, the Iranian response is presented without full context or verification of the exact wording us

Why objectivity (45): The article has a strongly negative tone toward Ben-Gvir, labeling him as a 'Schande' and using emotionally charged language. It presents only the criticism without providing counterpoints or context about the political environment in which such statements are made.

Kurier logoKurierParty-alignedConservativeFactual 65Objective 557 days ago
'These are not people': Israel blocks Gaza peace efforts

The article discusses recent developments in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, focusing on U.S. President Donald Trump's stalled peace plan for the Gaza Strip. Hamas has agreed to hand over weapons to a new transitional Palestinian administration, marking a potential breakthrough. However, Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu remains opposed, insisting on complete disarmament of Hamas before withdrawing troops from Gaza. The situation in Gaza is described as dire, with many residents living in deplorable conditions. U.S. special envoy Jared Kushner is engaged in direct talks with Hamas, but his efforts face resistance. Meanwhile, a far-right Israeli minister has made inflammatory remarks calling for mass killings of people in Gaza, claiming they are 'not even humans.' Muslim states have criticized Israel's stance, while the humanitarian crisis continues.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the Israeli government's position as legitimate and necessary, emphasizing Netanyahu's opposition to the peace plan and highlighting the far-right minister's extreme rhetoric. While it presents both sides of the conflict, the emphasis on Israel's security concerns and the harshly-

Why factuality (65): The article reports on Trump's peace plan and Hamas' potential agreement to hand over weapons, but lacks specific dates or sources to verify these claims. It mentions Israeli government stance and conditions for withdrawal, which aligns with general knowledge of the conflict. However, the lack of di

Why objectivity (55): The tone is somewhat biased towards the Palestinian perspective, using phrases like 'blockiert Bemühungen' and describing the situation as 'menschenunwürdigen Bedingungen'. The article frames the Israeli position as obstructive rather than presenting both sides equally.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories