ON
← Back to feed
US Federal Trade Commission, 22 US states sue Amazon over allegedly illegal advertising practices
IL🏛️ PoliticsCenter5 hr. ago

US Federal Trade Commission, 22 US states sue Amazon over allegedly illegal advertising practices

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with 22 states, alleges that Amazon.com engaged in illegal advertising practices by secretly increasing the minimum price required for advertisers to promote their products. This led to significant financial harm for advertisers, with the FTC claiming losses of $20 billion or more. The lawsuit accuses Amazon of inflating auction prices without advertiser consent, generating billions in profits at the expense of its customers. Amazon responded by denying the allegations, stating its advertising policies aim to show the most relevant ads and that average costs per click have remained stable since 2019. The company emphasized its commitment to competitive pricing and customer satisfaction. Earlier this year, Amazon had already settled a separate FTC case involving deceptive subscription practices by paying $2.5 billion in fines and reimbursements.

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentCenter5 hr. ago
US Federal Trade Commission, 22 US states sue Amazon over allegedly illegal advertising practices

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), along with 22 states, alleges that Amazon.com engaged in illegal advertising practices by secretly increasing the minimum price required for advertisers to promote their products. This led to significant financial harm for advertisers, with the FTC claiming losses of $20 billion or more. The lawsuit accuses Amazon of inflating auction prices without advertiser consent, generating billions in profits at the expense of its customers. Amazon responded by denying the allegations, stating its advertising policies aim to show the most relevant ads and that average costs per click have remained stable since 2019. The company emphasized its commitment to competitive pricing and customer satisfaction. Earlier this year, Amazon had already settled a separate FTC case involving deceptive subscription practices by paying $2.5 billion in fines and reimbursements.

Bias read (Center): While the issue involves regulatory action against a major corporation, the article presents both the FTC's allegations and Amazon's rebuttal without overtly favoring either side. The framing remains balanced between the regulatory claims and corporate defense, though there is a slight emphasis on '

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories