ON
← Back to feed
US Charges Eight More Iranians in Global Hacking Case
United States🏛️ PoliticsCenter4 days ago

US Charges Eight More Iranians in Global Hacking Case

On August 19, 2026, U.S. prosecutors announced charges against eight additional Iranians involved in a global hacking campaign attributed to the Mabna Institute based in Tehran. This brings the total number of individuals linked to the case to 17, with nine previously charged in 2018. The indictment alleges that the Mabna Institute conducted cyberattacks on behalf of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other entities, targeting over 100,000 academic accounts across 322 universities, compromising approximately 8,000 of them. These actions resulted in the theft of at least 31.5 terabytes of research and intellectual property. The hackers are also accused of breaching companies, U.S. government agencies, the United Nations, and UNICEF, selling stolen academic materials via Iranian websites. The U.S. State Department has offered rewards of up to $10 million for information leading to the location of five of the defendants.

U.S. authorities have charged eight additional Iranians in a sweeping cybercrime case involving a state-backed hacking operation that targeted institutions across the globe. The new charges bring the total number of individuals accused of being part of the Tehran-based Mabna Institute to 17, with nine already facing charges dating back to 2018. According to the U.S. Justice Department, the group operated under the direction of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other affiliated entities, conducting sophisticated cyberattacks against universities, corporations, government bodies, and international organizations such as the United Nations and UNICEF. The indictment alleges that the hackers infiltrated over 100,000 academic accounts, compromising approximately 8,000 of these at 322 universities. The stolen data includes at least 31.5 terabytes of research and intellectual property. In addition to targeting educational institutions, the group reportedly breached private companies, U.S. government agencies, and humanitarian organizations, using the stolen information for undisclosed purposes. Some of the stolen academic materials were allegedly sold through Iranian-controlled websites, according to the U.S. government. The Mabna Institute, based in Tehran, has been identified as the central entity behind the hacking operations. The organization is known for its ties to Iran's intelligence services and has previously been implicated in cyberattacks targeting Western governments and institutions. The latest charges mark another escalation in the ongoing legal battle against the group, which has drawn attention from both domestic and international law enforcement agencies. The U.S. State Department has offered rewards of up to $10 million for information leading to the capture of five of the indicted individuals. The initial charges against the Mabna Institute were filed in 2018, following a series of high-profile cyber intrusions that raised concerns about state-sponsored espionage. Since then, the U.S. has pursued multiple legal actions against members of the group, including arrests and extradition efforts. The current indictment expands the scope of the investigation, linking more individuals to the broader network of cybercriminal activity attributed to Iran. Law enforcement officials have emphasized that the attacks were not isolated incidents but part of a coordinated effort to gather sensitive information and disrupt critical infrastructure. International responses to the allegations have varied. While some countries have expressed support for the U.S. stance, others have called for diplomatic dialogue to address the issue of cyber warfare. The U.S. has sought cooperation from allies to track down the suspects and prevent further breaches. Meanwhile, the Iranian government has consistently denied involvement in the alleged activities, dismissing the accusations as politically motivated. This denial has led to increased tensions between the two nations, particularly in the context of broader geopolitical disputes. Looking ahead, the U.S. is expected to continue its legal pursuit of the remaining suspects, potentially seeking international warrants or working through Interpol to locate them. The case also underscores the growing challenge of attributing cyberattacks to specific states or groups, as digital footprints can be obscured through complex networks and proxy actors. As the investigation unfolds, the focus will remain on gathering evidence to secure convictions and deter future cyber threats. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how such crimes are prosecuted under international law.

Go to the primary sources (2)

The official sources this coverage is built on. Read them directly to bypass framing.

1 reports

OCCRP logoOCCRPIndependentCenterFactual 95Objective 904 days ago
US Charges Eight More Iranians in Global Hacking Case

On August 19, 2026, U.S. prosecutors announced charges against eight additional Iranians involved in a global hacking campaign attributed to the Mabna Institute based in Tehran. This brings the total number of individuals linked to the case to 17, with nine previously charged in 2018. The indictment alleges that the Mabna Institute conducted cyberattacks on behalf of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and other entities, targeting over 100,000 academic accounts across 322 universities, compromising approximately 8,000 of them. These actions resulted in the theft of at least 31.5 terabytes of research and intellectual property. The hackers are also accused of breaching companies, U.S. government agencies, the United Nations, and UNICEF, selling stolen academic materials via Iranian websites. The U.S. State Department has offered rewards of up to $10 million for information leading to the location of five of the defendants.

Bias read (Center): The article presents factual information about legal charges brought by U.S. prosecutors against individuals linked to Iran. It does not exhibit overtly biased language, one-sided sourcing, or omissions that would indicate a clear ideological lean. The content focuses on the allegations made by theU

Why factuality (95): The article accurately reports the 17 Iranians being charged, the expansion from the 2018 indictment, and the involvement of the Mabna Institute. It mentions the 31.5 terabytes of data stolen, aligning closely with the primary source document. However, it adds details like 'more than 100,000 academi

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the facts neutrally, using standard journalistic language. It avoids overtly biased terms and provides context about the charges and rewards. The tone remains professional and objective throughout.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories