ON
← Back to feed
US, Canadian healthcare failing to address rising antisemitism since Oct. 7, review says
IL🏛️ PoliticsConservativeyesterday

US, Canadian healthcare failing to address rising antisemitism since Oct. 7, review says

A peer-reviewed review titled 'Anatomy of Antisemitism in Health Professions Education and Practice' highlights a significant rise in antisemitism in healthcare settings since Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel. The study, which analyzed data from multiple countries, found that fewer than 2% of healthcare institutions had included antisemitism education in their anti-discrimination training. In the U.S., 88% of Jewish medical students and physicians reported experiencing antisemitism post-October 7, with over 35% facing direct antisemitic incidents. Similar trends were observed in the UK and Canada, where surveys showed drastic increases in perceived antisemitism among Jewish healthcare professionals. The review also notes a lack of academic research on antisemitism in healthcare, with only 61 published works compared to thousands on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and racism.

A new peer-reviewed narrative review published this week highlights a growing concern among Jewish healthcare professionals in the United States and Canada regarding a surge in antisemitism since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023. According to the study titled Anatomy of Antisemitism in Health Professions Education and Practice, fewer than 2% of surveyed healthcare institutions have integrated education on antisemitism into their anti-discrimination training programs. The findings come amid reports of a sharp rise in antisemitic experiences among Jewish medical students and physicians. A survey cited in the review indicates that 88% of Jewish medical students and physicians in the U.S. have encountered antisemitism since October 7, a dramatic jump from 40% prior to that date. Over 35% of respondents reported being directly targeted by antisemitic remarks, while more than 30% faced such incidents in person. Nearly half of those surveyed noted exposure to antisemitism online, and 21% experienced it during academic settings. Similar trends emerged in the United Kingdom, where 95% of 293 Jewish healthcare professionals surveyed reported increased antisemitism in their personal lives since October 7. Of these, 73% claimed they had been victims of at least one antisemitic incident, with many citing colleagues or superiors within their own healthcare environments as sources of such behavior. In Canada, the situation appears even more pronounced. A review of 1,000 Canadian Jewish medical professionals and students showed that only 1% considered antisemitism a serious issue in the medical field before October 7, compared to 98% afterward. This stark contrast underscores the rapid escalation of antisemitic sentiments in healthcare sectors across North America. The review also identified common patterns of harassment, social isolation, and workplace hostility affecting Jewish individuals in both academic and professional settings. It references several notable cases, including the controversy surrounding Australian nurses at Bankstown Hospital, the allegations against British physician Rahmeh Aladwan linking her to extremist groups, and a therapist who attributed mental illness to Zionism. These instances reflect broader concerns about the presence of antisemitism within healthcare communities. The analysis further reveals a disparity in scholarly attention given to antisemitism compared to other forms of discrimination. A search of the PubMed database for studies on antisemitism in healthcare yielded only 61 results, far below the 732 entries related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and the 3,824 associated with racism. This discrepancy suggests a lack of focus on addressing antisemitism within the medical profession despite its increasing prevalence. The review stresses that antisemitism contradicts the ethical principles guiding healthcare professionals. It calls for a commitment to creating inclusive and unbiased clinical and educational environments, emphasizing the moral obligation of medical practitioners to uphold these standards. Additionally, the document advocates for greater editorial oversight in medical and scientific publications to combat antisemitic biases that could exacerbate existing tensions. To tackle the issue effectively, the review recommends enhancing education on Jewish culture, history, and the role of health professions during the Holocaust. It also encourages critical reflection, fostering empathy, and implementing strict enforcement mechanisms to prevent and address antisemitic behaviors. The call for comprehensive measures aims to ensure that healthcare systems remain free from prejudice and hatred, aligning with the core values of the medical community.

1 reports

The Jerusalem Post logoThe Jerusalem PostIndependentConservativeFactual 85Objective 70yesterday
US, Canadian healthcare failing to address rising antisemitism since Oct. 7, review says

A peer-reviewed review titled 'Anatomy of Antisemitism in Health Professions Education and Practice' highlights a significant rise in antisemitism in healthcare settings since Hamas's October 7 attack on Israel. The study, which analyzed data from multiple countries, found that fewer than 2% of healthcare institutions had included antisemitism education in their anti-discrimination training. In the U.S., 88% of Jewish medical students and physicians reported experiencing antisemitism post-October 7, with over 35% facing direct antisemitic incidents. Similar trends were observed in the UK and Canada, where surveys showed drastic increases in perceived antisemitism among Jewish healthcare professionals. The review also notes a lack of academic research on antisemitism in healthcare, with only 61 published works compared to thousands on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and racism.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames antisemitism in healthcare as a growing crisis requiring institutional action, aligning with narratives that emphasize security concerns and the need for stronger policies against extremism. While the focus is on documented incidents and statistical trends, the emphasis on the 'se

Why factuality (85): The article cites a peer-reviewed narrative review and references specific surveys from the US and UK, providing statistical data on increased antisemitism among Jewish healthcare professionals. While no primary source document was available, the information aligns with cross-source consensus on ris

Why objectivity (70): The article presents findings from surveys but frames them as 'evidence' and uses terms like 'substantial increase' and 'urges institutions to treat antisemitism as a mainstream issue,' which may reflect the authors' perspective rather than purely objective reporting. The focus on Jewish professiona

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories