ON
← Back to feed
US attacks Iran as IRGC claims strikes on US military sites in Gulf
Qatar🏛️ PoliticsCenter7 hr. ago

US attacks Iran as IRGC claims strikes on US military sites in Gulf

The United States conducted airstrikes against Iran's military targets along the southern coast and near the Strait of Hormuz, marking a renewed escalation in tensions between the two nations. The U.S. military, through CENTCOM, stated that the operation lasted seven hours and targeted dozens of locations, coinciding with a resumed naval blockade of Iranian ports. In response, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it launched attacks on U.S. military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan, targeting the U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters, fuel depots, and advanced aircraft shelters. Iranian officials reported civilian casualties and injuries from the U.S. strikes, with some sources citing over 30 deaths and 260 injuries. The conflict follows reports of escalating hostilities and raises concerns about potential disruptions to global energy supplies.

The United States has carried out additional airstrikes targeting Iran, according to US Central Command (CENTCOM). The operation, which lasted seven hours, concluded at 10pm EDT on Tuesday (02:00 GMT Wednesday), with fighter aircraft, drones and naval vessels hitting dozens of military targets near the Strait of Hormuz and along Iran's southern coastline. The strikes occurred as the US resumed a naval blockade of Iranian ports, raising concerns over possible disruptions to global energy supplies. Iranian state media reported explosions in multiple locations along the southern coast, including Bandar Abbas, Qeshm, Hengam, Sirik and Bushehr, where air defense systems were activated. Government spokesperson Fatemeh Mohajerani stated that more than 30 civilians were killed in recent US attacks in southern Iran. Hossein Kermanpour, a spokesperson for Iran’s Health Ministry, confirmed that over 260 individuals were injured, with 222 recovering after medical treatment. The Iranian military claimed that 13 US missiles struck facilities at Bambour Garrison in Iranshahr, resulting in the deaths of seven soldiers from the 388th Brigade and injuries to others. The attack targeted accommodation blocks, guard posts and a guesthouse, with Iran accusing Washington of aiming to cause “maximum casualties.” Reports from Tehran indicated that a bottled water facility in Dehloran, western Ilam province, was reportedly hit, and projectiles struck soldiers' accommodations at a military base in Bampur, in southeastern Sistan and Baluchestan province. In response to the US strikes, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) announced overnight attacks on US military assets in Bahrain, Kuwait and Jordan. The IRGC claimed it inflicted significant damage on the US Fifth Fleet headquarters, support facilities and fuel depots in Bahrain, as well as a major US military logistics hub at Mina Abdullah in Kuwait. The group also stated that it destroyed shelters housing US F-15, F-16 and F-35 fighter jets, along with several MQ-9 drones. Jordan’s military confirmed that its air defenses intercepted and shot down three Iranian ballistic missiles that entered the kingdom’s airspace early on Wednesday. This latest exchange follows a memorandum of understanding signed just over a month ago between Washington and Tehran, extending an April ceasefire and outlining plans for discussions aimed at concluding the conflict that began on February 28 with Israeli and US strikes on Iran. Both parties have since alleged violations of the agreement. President Donald Trump reiterated his stance during an interview with Fox News, stating that attacks on Iran would continue until he declared otherwise. He suggested that future targets might include power plants and bridges, emphasizing that energy targets would be addressed eventually. The US also resumed its naval blockade of vessels traveling to or from Iranian ports and coastal areas, effective at 20:00 GMT on Tuesday.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and your personalized For You feed.

Become a Supporter

2 reports

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishState / PublicCenterFactual 85Objective 757 hr. ago
Can the US and Iran reach a lasting deal to end the conflict?

The United States and Iran are engaged in renewed hostilities despite having recently signed an agreement intended to resolve their ongoing conflict. The current tensions center around the Strait of Hormuz, where Iran has targeted ships passing through the waterway, prompting U.S. air strikes in response. These strikes have primarily affected the southern coast of Iran, though other regions have also been impacted. President Donald Trump has informed Congress that hostilities have resumed and emphasized that negotiations with Iran require demonstrating military strength. In contrast, Iran asserts that it will not yield to U.S. pressures or aggressive actions. Analysts from various institutions discuss the implications of these developments.

Bias read (Center): The article presents the situation between the U.S. and Iran without overtly favoring either side. It includes perspectives from multiple analysts and reports both nations' positions without apparent bias. The framing remains neutral, focusing on the factual progression of events and quotes from各方分析

Why factuality (85): The article reports on renewed US-Iran tensions and mentions the Strait of Hormuz as a focal point, aligning with the cross-source consensus. It references President Trump's stance and quotes experts, which adds credibility. However, it lacks specific dates and details from primary sources, relying

Why objectivity (75): The tone is somewhat biased toward the US perspective, emphasizing military action and quoting officials like Trump. While it presents both sides, the emphasis on US actions and the lack of balance in reporting on Iranian casualties suggests a slight editorial lean.

Al Jazeera English logoAl Jazeera EnglishState / PublicCenterFactual 80Objective 702 days ago
US attacks Iran as IRGC claims strikes on US military sites in Gulf

The United States conducted airstrikes against Iran's military targets along the southern coast and near the Strait of Hormuz, marking a renewed escalation in tensions between the two nations. The U.S. military, through CENTCOM, stated that the operation lasted seven hours and targeted dozens of locations, coinciding with a resumed naval blockade of Iranian ports. In response, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it launched attacks on U.S. military installations in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Jordan, targeting the U.S. Fifth Fleet headquarters, fuel depots, and advanced aircraft shelters. Iranian officials reported civilian casualties and injuries from the U.S. strikes, with some sources citing over 30 deaths and 260 injuries. The conflict follows reports of escalating hostilities and raises concerns about potential disruptions to global energy supplies.

Bias read (Center): The article presents a balanced account of both U.S. and Iranian actions, providing details from multiple sources without overtly favoring either side. While the conflict itself is highly charged, the reporting does not exhibit clear ideological slant, focusing instead on factual developments and官方宣

Why factuality (80): The article provides detailed information about the US strikes, including the number of targets and coordination with CENTCOM. It includes casualty figures from Iranian officials, though these may be contested. The report aligns with the cross-source consensus regarding the location and nature of th

Why objectivity (70): The article appears to favor the US narrative by focusing on US military operations and citing official statements. It downplays potential Iranian counterclaims and does not provide sufficient context or alternative viewpoints, leading to a perceived bias.

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €5/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories