ON
← Back to feed
Marco Hočevar: Logar is not another Virant, at most he is another Janša (INTERVIEW)
Slovenia🏛️ PoliticsLean Conservativeyesterday

Marco Hočevar: Logar is not another Virant, at most he is another Janša (INTERVIEW)

The article discusses the results of the recent four-question referendum, where voters did not reach a unified decision on any of the issues. The analyst notes that the outcomes were highly balanced at two points, making it difficult to predict who might win the next super-referendum. The interview also covers developments within the ruling coalition and opposition, the significance of local elections, and their potential impact on next year’s presidential elections. High voter turnout, around 55%, was noted, particularly in EU/NATO-related questions and plebiscites. The increased participation is attributed to several factors, including the global and national political shifts during the pandemic, dissatisfaction with the third Janez Janša government, and the emergence of new political actors like the Resnica party. Long-term political disillusionment since 2011 has also played a role, alongside geopolitical changes and economic challenges such as inflation and energy crises. The analyst emphasizes that this wave of political engagement was gradual, fueled by ongoing protests and the development of grassroots organizations.

3 reports

Info360 logoInfo360IndependentCenterFactual 85Objective 903 days ago
FACT CHECK: Are we going to be for or against Janša the whole time?

In the latest episode of 'Ura Resnice,' titled 'Dva cepa,' guests Bernard Nežmah and Peter Gregorčič discuss whether Slovenia is becoming divided into two opposing camps centered around Prime Minister Janez Janša. Nežmah analyzes the results of recent referendums, suggesting that the opposition's strategy was effective, which led to unexpected outcomes. Gregorčič comments on the government's inability to control political dynamics, noting that despite having two long-standing parties (SDS and NSi), the government appears unable to manage political maneuvering effectively. He criticizes the outcome of the intervention law, stating it has yielded no tangible results.

Bias read (Center): The discussion presents viewpoints from both sides of the political spectrum without overtly favoring one over the other. The framing remains balanced, focusing on analysis rather than advocacy, and includes perspectives from individuals associated with different political stances.

Why factuality (85): The article provides specific details about the episode of 'URA RESNICE' including guests (Bernard Nežmah and Peter Gregorčič) and the topic discussed (Slovenia potentially splitting into two factions regarding Janez Janša). It quotes both participants accurately, describing their views on the refer

Why objectivity (90): The article presents the viewpoints of both guests without overt bias or emotional language. It frames the discussion as a debate between different perspectives rather than taking sides. The tone remains neutral and journalistic throughout.

Demokracija logoDemokracijaParty-alignedConservativeFactual 65Objective 405 days ago
In New Democracy read: Referendum agitation following the recipe of the Knin Balvan revolution

The article discusses the outcomes of four recent referendums in Slovenia, highlighting voter polarization and mixed results. It notes that the referendum on parliamentary investigation and the advisory vote on mandatory TV license fees revealed deep divisions among voters. While the anti-corruption referendum did not achieve a majority, the article suggests that the coalition government has still secured some key victories, such as support for ending the replacement of native voters with immigrants and phasing out the mandatory TV fee. The author emphasizes the need for major reforms but acknowledges challenges in implementing them through current institutions.

Bias read (Conservative): The article frames the referendums as victories for the ruling coalition, emphasizing policies like limiting immigration and phasing out the mandatory TV fee. It presents the opposition as having failed to mobilize sufficient public support, while portraying the coalition’s agenda, such as reducing移民

Why factuality (65): The article provides some factual observations about the referendum results, such as polarization and public concerns over RTV contributions. However, it makes unsubstantiated claims about the 'black hole' nature of RTV Slovenia and implies that the opposition successfully frightened voters, which l

Why objectivity (40): The article uses emotionally charged language like 'black hole,' 'mafia,' and 'agitators,' showing a clear bias toward certain political positions. It frames the outcome as a partial victory for the governing coalition while criticizing opponents, suggesting an unbalanced perspective.

Reporter logoReporterIndependentCenteryesterday
Marco Hočevar: Logar is not another Virant, at most he is another Janša (INTERVIEW)

The article discusses the results of the recent four-question referendum, where voters did not reach a unified decision on any of the issues. The analyst notes that the outcomes were highly balanced at two points, making it difficult to predict who might win the next super-referendum. The interview also covers developments within the ruling coalition and opposition, the significance of local elections, and their potential impact on next year’s presidential elections. High voter turnout, around 55%, was noted, particularly in EU/NATO-related questions and plebiscites. The increased participation is attributed to several factors, including the global and national political shifts during the pandemic, dissatisfaction with the third Janez Janša government, and the emergence of new political actors like the Resnica party. Long-term political disillusionment since 2011 has also played a role, alongside geopolitical changes and economic challenges such as inflation and energy crises. The analyst emphasizes that this wave of political engagement was gradual, fueled by ongoing protests and the development of grassroots organizations.

Bias read (Center): The article presents an analytical discussion of political trends, voter behavior, and referendum outcomes without overtly favoring any specific political group or ideology. It provides context on various political forces and does not exhibit clear bias through loaded language or selective sourcing.

How each side covered it

The same event, grouped by the political lean of the outlets covering it.

How each side covered it

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Covered around the world

The same event as reported in other countries.

Covered around the world

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Claims check

Key factual claims, and how many sources assert vs dispute each.

Claims check

Support independent, bias-aware news and unlock the social pulse, community voting, and every other Supporter feature.

Become a Supporter

Keep the news honest.

ObjectiveNews is reader-funded and ad-free — we show you the bias instead of hiding it. Support independent journalism for €4/month.

Become a Supporter

Related stories