On July 14, 2026, Iran's Foreign Ministry criticized the United Kingdom for designating the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization, calling the action 'unjustified' and 'irresponsible.' Iran argued that the IRGC is an official military branch and that the UK violated international law by labeling a state institution as a security threat. In response, the UK introduced new legislation allowing state-backed groups to be designated as security threats, expanding its counterterrorism measures. While some British politicians, including anti-Zionist MP Zarah Sultana and activist George Galloway, criticized the move as an infringement on free speech, others like MP Andy Burnham and Iranian Crown Prince Reza Pahlavi supported the decision, framing it as necessary to protect UK citizens from perceived threats.
Bias read (Progressive): The article frames the UK's designation of the IRGC as a legitimate counterterrorism measure, aligning with critics who view Iran as a threat. However, it highlights opposition from left-wing figures who argue the move restricts free speech and criticizes Israel, suggesting a left-leaning editorial傾



